Teabaggers on parade

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1YOjB6_hz4&feature=player_embedded


http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0414/tea-party-rally-cost-taxpayers-14000/


A University of Washington study that found “Among whites who approve of the Tea Party, only 35 percent said they believe blacks are hard-working, only 45 percent believe blacks are intelligent, and just 41 percent believe that they’re trustworthy.”

http://www.salon.com/news/the_numerologist/2010/04/15/who_are_the_tea_partiers

http://www.americablog.com/2010/04/nyt-teabagger-supporter-poll.html

These people are an endless source of amusement... and outrage.

"While use of congressional funds for events is common among both parties, it might be considered unseemly for lawmakers and Americans to protest big government and runaway spending by spending thousands of taxpayer dollars."

"Bachmann, a highly controversial lawmaker nationally, is a prominent and lauded figure within the movement. She's also known for parsing -- if not inventing -- facts.

This Sunday the congresswoman alleged on Fox News that President Obama has nationalized 51 percent of the private economy -- a wild-charge with no factual basis."


Do you think it is ever justified for citizens to take violent action against the government, or is it never justified?
Justified 24
Never justified 71
DK/NA 5

The overall percentage of Americans who think it's ever justified is 16%. So the Teabagger number is 50% higher than the public at large.
 
These people are an endless source of amusement... and outrage.

"While use of congressional funds for events is common among both parties, it might be considered unseemly for lawmakers and Americans to protest big government and runaway spending by spending thousands of taxpayer dollars."

"Bachmann, a highly controversial lawmaker nationally, is a prominent and lauded figure within the movement. She's also known for parsing -- if not inventing -- facts.

This Sunday the congresswoman alleged on Fox News that President Obama has nationalized 51 percent of the private economy -- a wild-charge with no factual basis."


Do you think it is ever justified for citizens to take violent action against the government, or is it never justified?
Justified 24
Never justified 71
DK/NA 5

The overall percentage of Americans who think it's ever justified is 16%. So the Teabagger number is 50% higher than the public at large.

Just amusement. They are impotent.
 
Tea Bag Truth!

These people are an endless source of amusement... and outrage.

"While use of congressional funds for events is common among both parties, it might be considered unseemly for lawmakers and Americans to protest big government and runaway spending by spending thousands of taxpayer dollars."

"Bachmann, a highly controversial lawmaker nationally, is a prominent and lauded figure within the movement. She's also known for parsing -- if not inventing -- facts.

This Sunday the congresswoman alleged on Fox News that President Obama has nationalized 51 percent of the private economy -- a wild-charge with no factual basis."


Do you think it is ever justified for citizens to take violent action against the government, or is it never justified?
Justified 24
Never justified 71
DK/NA 5

The overall percentage of Americans who think it's ever justified is 16%. So the Teabagger number is 50% higher than the public at large.

teabaggers-dont-know-why.jpg


Tea Bag truth: A sad collection of angry, undereducated people who are being manipulated and used
By Jack Lessenberry
Created Apr 15 2010 - 12:16pm

No, the health insurance reform isn't perfect. But it is better than what we've had. Late last week, hundreds of ignorant Tea Party morons were as ecstatic as pigs in a Dumpster full of stale doughnuts. Bart Stupak, the Michigan congressman who cast a difficult vote to make health care reform reality, was stepping down!

"That'll show 'em!" the know-nothings cried. How dare Stupak vote to provide all Americans a chance to have health care insurance! Fanatic anti-abortion protesters were happy too.

Never mind that Stupak may be the most anti-abortion Democrat in Congress. Never mind that he only voted for health care after President Obama signed an executive order declaring it illegal to use any federal funds for abortion.

No, the Christian nutball universe saw this principled man as having sold out to baby-killers. His courageous act was denounced by people calling themselves good Roman Catholics who remained silent about revelations that their pope, the onetime "unenthusiastic" Hitler Youth member Joey Ratzinger, helped cover up and protect child molesters before he became CEO of the church of the pederasts.

The wacky Catholics are in a class by themselves. The Tea Partiers, some of whom packed three buses that careened state to state, seemed less interested in abortion. They were fixated on the crackpot idea that Stupak had expanded big government by voting to require people buy health care from private insurers, thus giving capitalism many new customers.

Ever since the vote, they had been attacking Stupak, a Democrat from Menominee who has been elected easily nine times in a district that usually has elected Republicans.

Ironically, he got it from both sides. When he first said he couldn't support the health care bill without changes, liberals savaged him. Maureen Dowd wrote in The New York Times that "we might have to bang Bart's head into a blackboard a few times." Michael Moore said Stupak had "neither a uterus nor a brain."

None of that swayed Bart Stupak a bit. Indeed, he still seems to be far more authentic than most congressmen. Now 58, he was a cop and a state trooper who put himself through law school. He served a term in the state House, and then got elected to Congress, beating a much-better known and better-funded opponent. He's won easily since. His people know him.

And those who've gotten closer to his district than a TV studio knew there was little reason to think he was in serious trouble, despite his health care vote. Nor is there any indication that his voters were upset by an ethics complaint brought against him by a government watchdog group that's alleging he received discount housing in a Washington, D.C. boarding house connected to a secretive Christian group known as "The Family."

Most of his constituents know that Stupak won't even accept the cushy health plan congressmen can get. Instead, he pays for his own, through a plan offered to former state employees. He needs it too; an injury chasing a crook in his police days has meant he's suffered through many knee operations.

Indeed, my guess is that the bused-in blowhards of the Tea Party Express would actually have helped him at home. Yoopers don't much like strangers telling them what to do. In fact, they might have asked embarrassing questions of the Tea Partiers, questions the national media might have asked if they had been doing their jobs. Such as, "Who paid for these folks to go tell people in other states how to vote?"

"Do any of them have jobs?" Reportedly, the organizer of the tour offered Stupak $700,000 to quit his job, before the congressman decided not to run for re-election. Was that a serious offer? Does that constitute a thinly veiled offer to bribe a federal official? And in any event, who is putting up that kind of money?

There have been lots of reports that the Tea Party protesters are a sad collection of angry and undereducated people who are actually being manipulated and used by various big-money right-wing interest groups. There are also signs they aren't really typical independent voters, as their self-appointed spokesmen tend to claim.

A Quinnipiac University poll found that 77 percent of them had voted for John McCain. Nearly all were white; 74 percent identified themselves as Republican or GOP-leaning. Meanwhile, the admittedly liberal Talking Points Memo has shown that the Political Action Committee (PAC) behind the Tea Party Express, directed almost two thirds of its funding to the Republican-affiliated political consulting firm that created the committee in the first place!

The sign-waving screamers are, then, at best only a pawn in somebody else's game. Yet aren't they a potent political force? Didn't they, after all, knock off Stupak? Their so-called leaders clearly think so. According to The New York Times, one yelled out in Escanaba, "Let that be a warning to the rest of the rats on the U.S.S. Marx!"

The facts are much different. Actually, they may not have had anything to do with Stupak's decision not to run for re-election.

While he seemed burned-out after the nasty health care battle, there were lots of earlier indications that he was thinking about stepping down. He hadn't been raising money, for one thing. He had been telling friends he was tired. Besides going back and forth to Washington, Stupak's district is one of the geographically largest east of the Mississippi bigger than West Virginia. (All districts must have the same number of people, and northern Michigan is sparsely populated.)

Unfortunately, he made his announcement just when the crazies were careening though his district. Ten years from now, Stupak will still be the man who cast a difficult and honest vote that helped millions of Americans get health care for the first time.

The Tea Party Movement will be lucky to be in Trivial Pursuit.

* * *
 
yawn

they're probably all liberal plants from crashtheteaparty that legion troll talked about

and really, one could easily keep putting up videos of stupid obama voters, then again, its clear most of the libs on this site have no substance, only smears about the tea party
 
Just amusement. They are impotent.

71% said it would be never justified to take up arms against your government? Never?

I own no guns and I'm not out shooting people or government officials but I would not say 'never' to a question like that. I imagine the chances being infinitesimal (sp) of anything ever happening but I saw people taking up arms against the police in the LA Riots and I'm assuming the police count as part of our government so it's not like it hasn't happened.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1YOjB6_hz4&feature=player_embedded


http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0414/tea-party-rally-cost-taxpayers-14000/


A University of Washington study that found “Among whites who approve of the Tea Party, only 35 percent said they believe blacks are hard-working, only 45 percent believe blacks are intelligent, and just 41 percent believe that they’re trustworthy.”

http://www.salon.com/news/the_numerologist/2010/04/15/who_are_the_tea_partiers

http://www.americablog.com/2010/04/nyt-teabagger-supporter-poll.html

wow... such unbiased sites....

"NYT Teabagger supporter poll: 24% says violence against govt is justified "

We can automatically discount any idiocy that refers to the tea party as 'teabaggers' as they are clearly biased.

As for the UW 'poll'.... produce the poll survey questions etc.... because I am currently calling bullshit.
 
More titillating tales of teabaggery:

http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2010/04/scenes-from-teabaggery.html

Once their ragtag "movement" has been riddled with agents provocateur, their own paranoia will destroy them.


LOL it's like kindergarteners plotting to get their enemy. You're such a fucking joke. I'm literally laughing out loud.

You actually believe tea party are the idiot strawmen portrayed by your fellow libtards. You fuckheads believe your own propaganda. Just like global warming!! what total fucking idiots you guys are.

Get something strait, dumbass, your fellow libtards and their lame attempts to paint the tea party as dolts have backfired. Everyone knows you liberals don't play fair and are less than honorable people.

This has been one hell of a good season for libertarians! Ron paul is gonna kick ass next time around. you liberals have set the stage for a backlash against your empty suit Obama and the bushtard religious right won't be able to stop the exodus of libertarian leaning conservatives
 
...

A University of Washington study that found “Among whites who approve of the Tea Party, only 35 percent said they believe blacks are hard-working, only 45 percent believe blacks are intelligent, and just 41 percent believe that they’re trustworthy.”

http://www.salon.com/news/the_numerologist/2010/04/15/who_are_the_tea_partiers

http://www.americablog.com/2010/04/nyt-teabagger-supporter-poll.html

Funny, the NY Times poll found very different:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/us/politics/15poll.html?ref=us

April 14, 2010
Poll Finds Tea Party Backers Wealthier and More Educated
By KATE ZERNIKE and MEGAN THEE-BRENAN
Tea Party supporters are wealthier and more well-educated than the general public, and are no more or less afraid of falling into a lower socioeconomic class, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll.

The 18 percent of Americans who identify themselves as Tea Party supporters tend to be Republican, white, male, married and older than 45.

They hold more conservative views on a range of issues than Republicans generally. They are also more likely to describe themselves as “very conservative” and President Obama as “very liberal.”

And while most Republicans say they are “dissatisfied” with Washington, Tea Party supporters are more likely to classify themselves as “angry.”

The Tea Party movement burst onto the scene a year ago in protest of the economic stimulus package, and its supporters have vowed to purge the Republican Party of officials they consider not sufficiently conservative and to block the Democratic agenda on the economy, the environment and health care. But the demographics and attitudes of those in the movement have been known largely anecdotally. The Times/CBS poll offers a detailed look at the profile and attitudes of those supporters.

Their responses are like the general public’s in many ways. Most describe the amount they paid in taxes this year as “fair.” Most send their children to public schools. A plurality do not think Sarah Palin is qualified to be president, and, despite their push for smaller government, they think that Social Security and Medicare are worth the cost to taxpayers. They actually are just as likely as Americans as a whole to have returned their census forms, though some conservative leaders have urged a boycott.

Tea Party supporters’ fierce animosity toward Washington, and the president in particular, is rooted in deep pessimism about the direction of the country and the conviction that the policies of the Obama administration are disproportionately directed at helping the poor rather than the middle class or the rich.

The overwhelming majority of supporters say Mr. Obama does not share the values most Americans live by and that he does not understand the problems of people like themselves. More than half say the policies of the administration favor the poor, and 25 percent think that the administration favors blacks over whites — compared with 11 percent of the general public.

They are more likely than the general public, and Republicans, to say that too much has been made of the problems facing black people.

Asked what they are angry about, Tea Party supporters offered three main concerns: the recent health care overhaul, government spending and a feeling that their opinions are not represented in Washington.

...
 
Back
Top