The 20 Richest Americans: Takers, Not Makers

S

signalmankenneth

Verified User
http://www.truth-out.org/buzzflash/...cans-takers-not-makers?tmpl=component&print=1

092213-toon-luckoviched.jpg
 
Couple of things. One is that I have been saying this for years. It is you lefties who touch yourselves in your private places when Buffett calls for higher taxes.


Two. The majority on the list are left wingers. Nice job exposing your brethren.
 
Kenny, do you agree that in order for there to be rich, there must be many poor? In other words, is there a finite pool of wealth that the rich take from excessively, causing many others to be poor?
 
sorry. You don't get to define takers however you wish. I invented the term takers. I was using it before the media read JPP and stole it.

Those building the roof, how'd they get that job? Did it fall out of the sky? Or are they employed by someone that got them the job in the first place?

Again, it's not complicated. Who puts more into the system vs. takes out? If you take more out then you put in, you are a taker. end of discussion.
 
Ghost of Watermark said:
sorry. You don't get to define takers however you wish. I invented the term takers. I was using it before the media read JPP and stole it.

Those building the roof, how'd they get that job? Did it fall out of the sky? Or are they employed by someone that got them the job in the first place?

Again, it's not complicated. Who puts more into the system vs. takes out? If you take more out then you put in, you are a taker. end of discussion.
Click to expand...

Their argument that Gates was a taker because he saw the opportunity is laughable. No doubt Gates was ruthless. But that is business
 
Gates and especially Allen routinely fuck over Seattle. Allen is working to cripple our transportation infrastructure. Nationwide, however, their contributions are undeniably positive and fruitful.
 
:rofl2:

No mention of Steve Jobs and Apple, the liberals favorite company that avoided paying billions in taxes.
 
Ghost of Watermark said:
sorry. You don't get to define takers however you wish. I invented the term takers. I was using it before the media read JPP and stole it.

Those building the roof, how'd they get that job? Did it fall out of the sky? Or are they employed by someone that got them the job in the first place?

Again, it's not complicated. Who puts more into the system vs. takes out? If you take more out then you put in, you are a taker. end of discussion.
Click to expand...
Christ almighty Grind. That phrase has been used and beat to death by Rand followers since before you were born.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top