The Iraqi Swindle

Cancel7

Banned
This is a long piece, in Rolling Stone.

It will also leave you feeling like you want to throw up. And if you lost someone you loved in Iraq, you probably would feel like you have a good place to put a few bullets.

Viva la Capitalism baby. What's a few, or a few hundred thousand lives? And these people (yeah, I mean BUSH) actually use the word "God" you know. God and Jesus. And their tongues don't get burned off instantly, proof, if any were needed, that if God exists, he or she does not meddle in our affairs.

If ever in our history executions were called for, this is that time.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/16076312/the_great_iraq_swindle

You've done such a terrible job, in fact, that when auditors from the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction visit the college in the summer of 2006, their report sounds like something out of one of the Saw movies: "We witnessed a light fixture so full of diluted urine and feces that it would not operate," they write, adding that "the urine was so pervasive that it had permanently stained the ceiling tiles" and that "during our visit, a substance dripped from the ceiling onto an assessment team member's shirt." The final report helpfully includes a photo of a sloppy brown splotch on the outstretched arm of the unlucky auditor.

When Congress gets wind of the fias*co, a few members on the House Oversight Committee demand a hearing. To placate them, your company decides to send you to the Hill -- after all, you're a former Air Force major general who used to oversee this kind of contracting operation for the government. So you take your twenty-minute ride in from the suburbs, sit down before the learned gentlemen of the committee and promptly get asked by an irritatingly eager Maryland congressman named Chris Van Hollen how you managed to spend $72 million on a pile of shit.

You blink. Fuck if you know. "I have some conjecture, but that's all it would be" is your deadpan answer.

The room twitters in amazement. It's hard not to applaud the balls of a man who walks into Congress short $72 million in taxpayer money and offers to guess where it all might have gone.

Next thing you know, the congressman is asking you about your company's compensation. Touchy subject -- you've got a "cost-plus" contract, which means you're guaranteed a base-line profit of three percent of your total costs on the deal. The more you spend, the more you make -- and you certainly spent a hell of a lot. But before this milk-faced congressman can even think about suggesting that you give these millions back, you've got to cut him off. "So you won't voluntarily look at this," Van Hollen is mumbling, "and say, given what has happened in this project . . . "

"No, sir, I will not," you snap.

". . . 'We will return the profits.' . . ."

"No, sir, I will not," you repeat.
 
I'm going to read the rest of this at home. Thanks for posting it. It's a good counterpoint to the recent news that whistleblowers on Iraq fraud are getting fired and thrown in jail.

I remember when some considered me way off the map, when I suggested Bush's War was about oil, and making money. I don't think I was too far off, and I think a lot more people believe that now.
 
I'm going to read the rest of this at home. Thanks for posting it. It's a good counterpoint to the recent news that whistleblowers on Iraq fraud are getting fired and thrown in jail.

I remember when some considered me way off the map, when I suggested Bush's War was about oil, and making money. I don't think I was too far off, and I think a lot more people believe that now.

It's really bad. Worse than anyone can imagine. It's not incompetence.

It is something you need to read at home though. I read it in the actual magazine last night, and I just can't get over it.
 
Back
Top