The Laschamp event and the demise of Neanderthals

Dutch Uncle

* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
The strongest theory about the demise of Neanderthals which I've read.

The Laschamp event was the reduction of the Earth's magnetic field to about 10% of present strength about 42,000 years ago. This also coincides with the demise of the Neanderthals.

A repeat of the Laschamp excursion would be disasterous for modern human civilization since it would take out both our satellites and our power grid. A failure of the grid would result in massive famine with up to 7.5B humans dying in the first year or two.

Two Closely Related Species, and Two Wildly Divergent Fates​

Archaeological records indicate that Homo sapiens began creating tailored clothing during this time, using tools such as needles and hide scrapers. Raven Garvey, an anthropologist at the University of Michigan, noted in Discover Magazine that this clothing likely served a dual purpose. “Tailored clothing could have also provided another unintended benefit—protection from sun damage,” she said.

In addition to clothing, Homo sapiens increasingly used ochre—a reddish pigment made of iron oxide, clay, and silica—during this period. When applied to the skin, ochre offers natural protection against the sun.

These adaptations likely gave Homo sapiens an edge over Neanderthals, who did not seem to adopt similar sun protection measures. Some researchers believe the harsh environmental conditions brought on by the Laschamps excursion contributed to Neanderthal extinction, as their inability to adapt to increased radiation would have had lethal consequences. Scientists have been searching for reasons to explain why Neanderthals and Homo sapies met such divergent fates around 40,000 years ago, and different responses to an environmental emergency could certainly explain it.
 
The strongest theory about the demise of Neanderthals which I've read.

The Laschamp event was the reduction of the Earth's magnetic field to about 10% of present strength about 42,000 years ago. This also coincides with the demise of the Neanderthals.

A repeat of the Laschamp excursion would be disasterous for modern human civilization since it would take out both our satellites and our power grid. A failure of the grid would result in massive famine with up to 7.5B humans dying in the first year or two.

Two Closely Related Species, and Two Wildly Divergent Fates​

Archaeological records indicate that Homo sapiens began creating tailored clothing during this time, using tools such as needles and hide scrapers. Raven Garvey, an anthropologist at the University of Michigan, noted in Discover Magazine that this clothing likely served a dual purpose. “Tailored clothing could have also provided another unintended benefit—protection from sun damage,” she said.

In addition to clothing, Homo sapiens increasingly used ochre—a reddish pigment made of iron oxide, clay, and silica—during this period. When applied to the skin, ochre offers natural protection against the sun.

These adaptations likely gave Homo sapiens an edge over Neanderthals, who did not seem to adopt similar sun protection measures. Some researchers believe the harsh environmental conditions brought on by the Laschamps excursion contributed to Neanderthal extinction, as their inability to adapt to increased radiation would have had lethal consequences. Scientists have been searching for reasons to explain why Neanderthals and Homo sapies met such divergent fates around 40,000 years ago, and different responses to an environmental emergency could certainly explain it.

Here is what I would ask the author.

Has this massive drop in paleomagnetic strength been thoroughly confirmed by regional or global geologic studies?

Wouldn't there be evidence of mass extinctions in other species in the fossil record?

Neanderthals lived at high latitudes and were only getting oblique sunlight of lower energy. Homo sapiens living in equatorial areas were getting the full blast of solar radiation, and modern aboriginal people in tropical or temperate equatorial areas didn't wear very many clothes. Look at aborigines in Australia. Would their darker skin be adequate protection?
 
Has this massive drop in paleomagnetic strength been thoroughly confirmed by regional or global geologic studies?

It was found in an extrusive flow in the Chans De Puy in France in 1967 and in the Olby flow nearby.

It appears that the anomaly is something like 160degrees off from the usual (I'm of course assuming you understand how geomagnetic anomalies are found and why one would look at extrusives. Let me know if you can't find it in Wikipedia).

Now, I'm not like you, Cy, and want to come here and blather like I actually understand geophysics but I'm curious what you think would be a better explanation for the 160degrees difference between alignment of the Fe in the phase assemblages other than a magnetic field destabilization.

I don't say this to merely point out the fact that you won't be able to discuss this scientifically, but because I am completely unfamiliar with any other explanation and I would be curious if someone smarter has told you something.





Or just whine because I'm posting on another thread. Maybe ban me.
 
Here is what I would ask the author.

Has this massive drop in paleomagnetic strength been thoroughly confirmed by regional or global geologic studies?

Wouldn't there be evidence of mass extinctions in other species in the fossil record?

Neanderthals lived at high latitudes and were only getting oblique sunlight of lower energy. Homo sapiens living in equatorial areas were getting the full blast of solar radiation, and modern aboriginal people in tropical or temperate equatorial areas didn't wear very many clothes. Look at aborigines in Australia. Would their darker skin be adequate protection?
It seems so, but needs more data.

Yes re extinctions: https://www.newscientist.com/articl...ipping-linked-to-extinctions-42000-years-ago/
“These extreme environmental changes may have caused, or at least contributed to, extinction events including those of large mammals in Australia and the Neanderthals in Europe,” says Paula Reimer at Queen’s University Belfast, UK, who wasn’t involved in the research. Megafauna across Australia and Tasmania – prehistoric giant mammals that existed in the Late Pleistocene – and Neanderthals in Europe went extinct around the same time as the magnetic pole reversal, 42,000 years ago.

Good question about the Aborigines. They arrived almost 10,000 years before the Laschamp excursion.

Archeological evidence indicates that the ancestors of today's Aboriginal Australians first migrated to the continent 50,000 to 65,000 years ago. Genomic studies suggest that the peopling of Australia happened between 43,000 to 60,000 years ago.
 
Now, I'm not like you, Cy, and want to come here and blather like I actually understand geophysics but I'm curious what you think would be a better explanation for the 160degrees difference between alignment of the Fe in the phase assemblages other than a magnetic field destabilization.

I don't say this to merely point out the fact that you won't be able to discuss this scientifically, but because I am completely unfamiliar with any other explanation and I would be curious if someone smarter has told you something.


Or just whine because I'm posting on another thread. Maybe ban me.
^^^
This is your weakness, Perry. It's also why I know you are not what you claim or, if you are, that you've lost most of your marbles along the way. No college graduate, much less a PhD, could be so petty. Or, if they are, then they've developed incapacitating mental issues.
 
^^^
This is your weakness, Perry. It's also why I know you are not what you claim or, if you are, that you've lost most of your marbles along the way. No college graduate, much less a PhD, could be so petty. Or, if they are, then they've developed incapacitating mental issues.

Try discussing the topic. Or do exactly as I predicted. Either way matters not to me one whit.


You think you have some insight on magnetic reversals jump right on in. Make sure to laud Cypress with a drooling affection. You always do.
 
Back
Top