the liberal 12 commandamants

I really like #6

6) Liberals believe in indiscriminateness for thought: This one was so good that I stole it from my buddy, Evan Sayet: " Indiscriminateness of thought does not lead to indiscriminateness of policy. It leads the modern liberal to invariably side with evil over good, wrong over right and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success. Why? Very simply if nothing is to be recognized as better or worse than anything else then success is de facto unjust. There is no explanation for success if nothing is better than anything else and the greater the success the greater the injustice. Conversely and for the same reason, failure is de facto proof of victimization and the greater the failure, the greater the proof of the victim is, or the greater the victimization."
Click to expand...
 
Hilarious that they would call them liberals when they really are not. :rofl2:

I might just as well call the white supremacists conservatives.
 
AProudLefty said:
Conservatives are not wrong by default.
Click to expand...

Not really. The difference per rule 6 would be something like this:

The Progressive (Liberal) tries something and it fails. The response is that they aren't trying hard enough and failure is indication that they're on the right path to success, their plan just needing (variously) more: Money, support, effort, or the like. That is, success per rule 6 is measured in failure. The greater the failure, the more likely the program will be successful eventually.

The Conservative tries something and it fails. The response is that didn't work we need to try something different... The Conservative not operating under rule 6 is able to discern success from failure, recognize the later, and want the former.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Not really. The difference per rule 6 would be something like this:

The Progressive (Liberal) tries something and it fails. The response is that they aren't trying hard enough and failure is indication that they're on the right path to success, their plan just needing (variously) more: Money, support, effort, or the like. That is, success per rule 6 is measured in failure. The greater the failure, the more likely the program will be successful eventually.

The Conservative tries something and it fails. The response is that didn't work we need to try something different... The Conservative not operating under rule 6 is able to discern success from failure, recognize the later, and want the former.
Click to expand...

In other words, liberals are evil and lazy, conservatives are good and work hard and think out of box.

See you've just described yourself by rule #6.
 
AProudLefty said:
In other words, liberals are evil and lazy, conservatives are good and work hard and think out of box.

See you've just described yourself by rule #6.
Click to expand...

No, not at all. Liberals are deluded fools who are setting themselves up for failure. Conservatives by contrast are more realistic in their worldview but just as prone to failure. The difference is Conservatives don't celebrate and reward failure while Liberals do.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
No, not at all. Liberals are deluded fools who are setting themselves up for failure. Conservatives by contrast are more realistic in their worldview but just as prone to failure. The difference is Conservatives don't celebrate and reward failure while Liberals do.
Click to expand...

I see. So there are no successful liberals? Is that's what you are saying?
 
AProudLefty said:
I see. So there are no successful liberals? Is that's what you are saying?
Click to expand...

I would say they are less likely to succeed and if they do, they have to (per some of the other rules) make damn sure to look and sound like failures since per rules 1, 4, and 7 appearance and following dogma are everything while actual results can be ignored. So, the limousine liberal class can be rich and successful just so long as they claim they are victims, minorities, following dogma, etc. Then per 11, they must show contrition by being very emotional about even being challenged on this.
Thus, the successful liberal is allowed penance within the Progressive Church.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I would say they are less likely to succeed and if they do, they have to (per some of the other rules) make damn sure to look and sound like failures since per rules 1, 4, and 7 appearance and following dogma are everything while actual results can be ignored. So, the limousine liberal class can be rich and successful just so long as they claim they are victims, minorities, following dogma, etc. Then per 11, they must show contrition by being very emotional about even being challenged on this.
Thus, the successful liberal is allowed penance within the Progressive Church.
Click to expand...

LOL. Okay that was hilarious. But what does it have to do with liberalism as a political philosophy?

Perhaps you are talking about the far left or leftists.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top