It was not designed to be terrifying.
It was designed to weight the cost of inaction over the cost of action.
You didnt really watch it did you?
so you dont get the point ?
Refute the validity of his out come in some logical way?
so you dont get the point ?
Refute the validity of his out come in some logical way?
You did not watch it did you?
It has just the opposite of fear tactics in it fella.
Hey Runyon ,I actually had not seen your post when I sent that reply.
BB was the only posts I was responding to with that remark.
Personally I think the whole global warming deal is hype, serious though since so many wish to jump on a Kyoto based bandwagon, ignoring that those who signed such have done much less than the US to reduce percentages of carbon emissions, if indeed such are truly causative to the warming trend that has been going on for quite some time. (Note: Yes temps have gone up, that doesn't equate to a cause and effect. There have been previous warming/cooling trends, which raised the spectre of cooling in the 70's, which was actually just a temporary plateau of the warming.)
But truth and reality do not meet all the time, thus global warming screeches are important as they are creating expenses to the consumer and perhaps much more serious unintended consequences such as possible food shortages down the line with new push for 'bio-fuels' using grains. All for a possible explanation of a weather trend that may or may not be caused in whole or part by the purported explanations.
In effect, the 'champions' of this theory are demanding a negative be proven. Until it can be or another, better topic comes along, there may be great harm done in ways that they've failed to see.
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20060722/food.asp
validated my response...........
You could use a bit of thought in the responses though, if you wish to be taken more seriously, it's up to you of course.
I could have said, being from the northern plains that every degree warmer makes our winters a bit more bearable, but I didn't go that way.
I tried to make a contrary argument, that whether or not it's real phenomena, the jury is still out. More than that, there is too many examples of the past, to not look for possible repercussions of just taking 'preventative' steps, without considering the consequences.
Now my argument may have many flaws, somehow I figure they will be pointed out.
My college days are over..I keep my comments short and too the point...no need for a thesis..not working on a MBA or anything like that...I am retired /tired and just like to have fun!
Well said. But he is a Jackass who doesn't know any betterSo why are you not happy just talking to yourself? Why clutter up boards for the rest of us? I'm not in college or working on master's, but still think that honest posts deserve honest answers.
Well said. But he is a Jackass who doesn't know any better
I'm on ognore but he still responds to me, in fact he just dedicated two special threads to me. Who who can say what he is likely to do?Well I was just wondering. Perhaps he'll decide to respond? Could that happen?