The Moderate Middle: Fascism's Cradle

Threedee said:
You believe in barter "economics." It takes a highly concentrated brainwash solution in order to create what you are. Fucktard and brainwash. Not to mention, virgin.
Click to expand...

Nice ad hominem attack. You got nothing ace.

Barter is superior economic system, as people actually have to have skills to succeed, allowing society to be free from the manipulations of banks and politicians. This why you hate barter, because currency manipulation is the lynchpin of modern fascism, and you're a fascist.
 
LOLZ, it is so much easier for the elite to control barter than currency. Just look at societies where they control land, and it has absolute worth, such as Medieval Europe and the Antebellum South.

Also, you claim it requires more skill to thrive under barter, and yet you can't even succeed with currency. Your ass would starve to fucking death.

Finally, I didn't start the ad homs (brainwash, etc.) you worthless IT peasant, complete with GED and virginity, but I will gladly return fire.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Fascism or Communism. Both share one thing in common. They are both totalitarianism. If you want to see how totalitrianism rises study the history of Europe after WW1 and during the Great Depression. Totalitarianism is at it's greatest risk to occur when policies are implmented that harm the working and middle classes and the polarizes the extremes. The single biggest cause of totalitarianism, what allows it to occur, is when a societies rulling class violates it's social contract with the governed and, for what ever reason, eliminates that societies social safety nets. When these social safety nets are eliminated and enough people fall out of the middle and working classes into the poor, then you have fertile breeding grounds for totalitarianism.
Click to expand...

Yeah, Mott. The Russian, Italian, and German coups all occurred after their respective governments yanked their citizens social safety nets.*

*Untrue
 
Dr. Fetus said:
Yeah, Mott. The Russian, Italian, and German coups all occurred after their respective governments yanked their citizens social safety nets.*

*Untrue
Click to expand...

but they did use the dissent due to the loss of jobs during the world wide depression to establish dictatorships
 
Threedee said:
LOLZ, it is so much easier for the elite to control barter than currency. Just look at societies where they control land, and it has absolute worth, such as Medieval Europe and the Antebellum South.

Also, you claim it requires more skill to thrive under barter, and yet you can't even succeed with currency. Your ass would starve to fucking death.

Finally, I didn't start the ad homs (brainwash, etc.) you worthless IT peasant, complete with GED and virginity, but I will gladly return fire.
Click to expand...

LOL. So wrong. If it was easier for them we would have a barter system.

You're so desperate you're making ridiculous assertions.


They can use currency to elevate stupider people above those with actual skills. So they can put globalist zealots in charge to deny skills where they actually exist, and make decisions according to a globalist agenda, and then feel like they're actually contributing and working hard. Currency distorts the market of skills.
 
AssHatZombie said:
LOL. So wrong. If it was easier for them we would have a barter system.

You're so desperate you're making ridiculous assertions.


They can use currency to elevate stupider people above those with actual skills. So they can put globalist zealots in charge to deny skills where they actually exist, and make decisions according to a globalist agenda, and then feel like they're actually contributing and working hard. Currency distorts the market of skills.
Click to expand...

They had absolute control over the common proles, but there were things they could not do. Under a barter system, which invariably leads to land empires such as feudalism, the elite can't develop new technologies and means of making war against their neighbors and foreign nations. Thus, they push for market reforms, modern banking practices, industrialization, and we get the modern world, but at a cost to them. We also gain a middle class, and more access to capital for the common man.
 
Threedee said:
They had absolute control over the common proles, but there were things they could not do. Under a barter system, which invariably leads to land empires such as feudalism, the elite can't develop new technologies and means of making war against their neighbors and foreign nations. Thus, they push for market reforms, modern banking practices, industrialization, and we get the modern world, but at a cost to them. We also gain a middle class, and more access to capital for the common man.
Click to expand...

That was a historical version of barter, and they're using currency to build a new dark age empire. You're beaten again, duncecap.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top