The NY civil judgement is NOT FOR DAMAGES.

Concart

Well-known member
Contributor
Since the many internet and Tik Tok lawyers appear to have skipped this day in law school, it is on me, apparently, to explain this to you like a three year old.

This case has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH DAMAGES. ZERO. NIL. NADA. It is a case that was filed seeking EQUITABLE RELIEF. This is important for a couple of reasons. Number one, when a plaintiff is seeking equitable relief rather than monetary damages, THERE IS NO RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL. PERIOD. It does not matter if Trump had requested it, the judge would have denied the request. The lawsuit was not seeking damages. It was seeking a remedy that would PREVENT FUTURE FRAUD BY THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION. You cannot sue for damages and have non-monetary penalties as part of the judgement. That's the reason that The Bobsie Twins are not allowed to do business in New York for three years. That's the reason Trump is banned for five years.

Someone called this a tort case. They did so because they are stupid. It is not a tort case. Others have claimed there is no victim. Even if we assume that isn't true, IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE. NONE.

If you had taken the time to read the ruling and do a couple of simple google searches, this would have been apparent to you, but you are so busy yelling and screaming about how horrible this action was that you didn't even bother to find out what exactly it was you were complaining about. Which means, of course that every one of you who whined about 'no victim' are now sitting there feckless, limp dick in hand and dunce cap on head. Because you are all lazy and stupid. To a man. I have not seen ANYONE point out this fact, which renders every single one of your stupid fucking argument moot.

You are welcome.

Carry on.
 
Our legal system has chosen to recognize corporate personhood. That means corporations can commit crimes separate from real people. We cannot put corporations in prison, so we can only fine them for their crimes.
 
Back
Top