The Scopes Monkey Trial is 100 years old this year; surprisingly we still have evolution-deniers

Where? Cite it

Name three current scientists.

Cite where you claimed that. You aret really trying to suggest science is filled with church goers are you?

You don't pay attention to you? Fucking sad. I mentioned the bullshit and you reinforced my point that the climate criers have determined that the science on climate change is settled. So much for your high minded bullshit about science is open to new evidence. That's a load of horseshit. You people think everyone is as stupid as you.
You're free to believe the Earth is not warming, and to bekir that scientists are serving the cause of atheism.

But in this case, your beliefs are contradicted by the facts.
 
The themes of social justice and self sacrifice found in the Hebrew prophets and New Testament were unprecedented in world literature to that point, and they are not rooted in Darwinian principles of evolution.
I can imagine how minds would evolve.
I can't imagine, despite the suggested possibilities, any other way of consensus principle occurring.

I obviously don't know everything.
My mind works the way it works, so I simply have an opinion of what seems probable to me.
My natural instinct is to attribute almost everything to genetics, or even more generally,
to the random confluence of atomic particles in space.

The source of the particles is impossible for me to understand, admittedly.
On a bad day, however, I can get pretty pissed that they somehow manifested themselves.
In an infinite vacuum, there would be no pain and no frustration;
and given that in so many lives, the rewards don't adequately compensate the travails, or even come close,
all of those lives are net-negative experiences.
 
You're free to believe the Earth is not warming, and to bekir that scientists are serving the cause of atheism.

But in this case, your beliefs are contradicted by the facts.
It has nothing to do with what I believe it's what I observe.

So you're suggesting the "science" of the climate bullshit is settled?

BTW I'm still waiting on the names of religious scientists more recent that than 1600s. LMFAO you people
 

It has nothing to do with what I believe it's what I observe.

So you're suggesting the "science" of the climate bullshit is settled?

Pretty much. It's basic, solid science and it's doing almost exactly what everyone predicted would happen. The biggest question still outstanding is: "how fast will things happen?".

BTW I'm still waiting on the names of religious scientists more recent that than 1600s. LMFAO you people

 
Back
Top