The Special Counsel’s 1/6 Report, made public last night, confirms the unavoidable facts of 1/6 yet again Liz Cheney
- Thread starter AProudLefty
- Start date
IBDaMann
Well-known member
[ The main body of the report is deleted because it is all the same irrational TDS-drivel mindlessly regurgitated by raving, dishonest, unhinged leftists on this site, attempting to justify the Injustice Department's tyrannical lawfare. There is no "evidence" in this report; there is only the decisions to declare Trump guilty of every trumped-up charge that the special prosecutor believed he could get to stick in a rigged court with illegal jury instructions ]
VI. CONCLUSION
On remand from the Supreme Court's decision in Trump, the district court set a litigation
schedule whereby the parties would submit briefs regarding whether any material in the
superseding indictment was subject to presidential immunity. ECF No. 233. The parties were in
the middle of that process when the results of the presidential election made clear that Mr. Trump
would be inaugurated as President of the United States on January 20, 2025. As described
above, it has long been the Department's interpretation that the Constitution forbids the federal
indictment and prosecution of a sitting President, but the election results raised for the first time
the question of the lawful course when a private citizen who has already been indicted is then
elected President. The Department detemined that the case must be dismissed without prejudice
before Mr. Trump takes office, and the Office therefore moved to dismiss the indictment on
November 25, 2024. See ECF No. 281. The district court granted the motion the same day.
ECF No. 283.
The Department's view that the Constitution prohibits the continued indictment and
prosecution of a President is categorical and does not turn on the gravity of the crimes charged,
the strength of the Government's proof, or the merits of the prosecution, which the Office stands
fully behind. Indeed, but for Mr. Trump's election and imminent return to the Presidency, the
Office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at
trial.
Paraphrasing: We HATE Trump. Waaaaah.