in the White House just to survive liberalism.
Thankfully, five of the Nifty Nine got started when they handed down a good one:
Naturally, the American Civil Liberties Union’s lawyer on the High Court dissented:
Ginsburg wrote that “it is all too apparent that to redress injuries like the one suffered here, it is Bivens or nothing. I resist the conclusion that ‘nothing’ is the answer required in this case."
The SCOTUS gave this country infanticide and constitutional Rights for illegal aliens. Uprooting the ACLU’s Communist agenda is critical:
I never knew that federal judges were allowed to define principles! I always thought judges were supposed to defend Rights spelled out in the written Constitution. In any event illegal aliens have no constitutional Right to be here; so deporting them posthaste cannot possibly deprive them of a constitutional liberty granted by the ACLU.
“The historical and practical importance of this ruling cannot be overstated,” said Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the ACLU’s immigrants’ rights project. “This decision reaffirms the Constitution’s foundational principle that individuals deprived of their liberty must have access to a federal court.”
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...direction-On-The-Border&p=2763814#post2763814
Can you imagine the uproar if President Trump replaces Ginsburg before November, or in his second term? Bret Kavanaugh got off easy compared to what Ginsburg’s replacement will suffer:
Democrats and hardcore Communists are conspiring to prop up Baby Ruth with embalming fluid if that is what it will take to keep her on the court until a Democrat president can replace her.
The ACLU’s Communist agenda took root 1920:
Note that Norman Thomas founded the National Civil Liberties Bureau during WW I which morphed into the ACLU in 1920. Roger Baldwin, one of the ACLU’s founders, and its first director, laid out the ACLU’s judicial philosophy for all time irrespective of the ACLU barring Communists from leadership and staff positions in 1940. Basically, Baldwin realized that controlling the courts was more important in the long run than was keeping a few easily-identified Communists on the ACLU’s payroll.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...urg%92s-Embalming-Fluid&p=3221695#post3221695
p.s. More bad news for Democrats:
https://www.weau.com/content/news/S...Arizona-death-sentence-568170501.html?ref=501
Thankfully, five of the Nifty Nine got started when they handed down a good one:
Tuesday's outcome also is certain to doom a lawsuit filed by the parents of a teenager killed in Nogales, Mexico, from gunshots fired across the border by a U.S. agent. That case has been on hold.
The case tested a half-century-old Supreme Court decision that allows people to sue federal officials for constitutional violations. Over the years, the courts have made it harder to bring claims, known as Bivens actions after the name of the high court case.
The case tested a half-century-old Supreme Court decision that allows people to sue federal officials for constitutional violations. Over the years, the courts have made it harder to bring claims, known as Bivens actions after the name of the high court case.
Naturally, the American Civil Liberties Union’s lawyer on the High Court dissented:
Ginsburg wrote that “it is all too apparent that to redress injuries like the one suffered here, it is Bivens or nothing. I resist the conclusion that ‘nothing’ is the answer required in this case."
Court closes courthouse door on slain Mexican teen's family
The Associated Press
MARK SHERMAN
Feb 25th 2020 11:52AM
https://www.aol.com/article/news/20...-door-on-slain-mexican-teens-family/23934090/
The Associated Press
MARK SHERMAN
Feb 25th 2020 11:52AM
https://www.aol.com/article/news/20...-door-on-slain-mexican-teens-family/23934090/
The SCOTUS gave this country infanticide and constitutional Rights for illegal aliens. Uprooting the ACLU’s Communist agenda is critical:
I never knew that federal judges were allowed to define principles! I always thought judges were supposed to defend Rights spelled out in the written Constitution. In any event illegal aliens have no constitutional Right to be here; so deporting them posthaste cannot possibly deprive them of a constitutional liberty granted by the ACLU.
“The historical and practical importance of this ruling cannot be overstated,” said Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the ACLU’s immigrants’ rights project. “This decision reaffirms the Constitution’s foundational principle that individuals deprived of their liberty must have access to a federal court.”
Court gives illegal immigrants new right of appeal before deportation
By Stephen Dinan
Thursday, March 7, 2019
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/mar/7/court-gives-illegal-immigrants-new-right-appeal/
By Stephen Dinan
Thursday, March 7, 2019
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/mar/7/court-gives-illegal-immigrants-new-right-appeal/
ACLU Communists ain’t about to give up a lucrative source of income:
2. Repeal every law that blocks immediate deportation.
3. Stop lawyers from getting tax dollars to pay all of those appeals illegal alien file after they are caught.
4. Make employers who hire illegals pay every cost associated with capture and deportation.
2. Repeal every law that blocks immediate deportation.
3. Stop lawyers from getting tax dollars to pay all of those appeals illegal alien file after they are caught.
4. Make employers who hire illegals pay every cost associated with capture and deportation.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...direction-On-The-Border&p=2763814#post2763814
Can you imagine the uproar if President Trump replaces Ginsburg before November, or in his second term? Bret Kavanaugh got off easy compared to what Ginsburg’s replacement will suffer:
Democrats and hardcore Communists are conspiring to prop up Baby Ruth with embalming fluid if that is what it will take to keep her on the court until a Democrat president can replace her.
XXXXX
August 30, 2011 4:45 PM
It’s amazing Ginsburg is even on the bench
By Steve Benen
https://washingtonmonthly.com/2011/08/30/its-amazing-ginsburg-is-even-on-the-bench/
It’s amazing Ginsburg is even on the bench
By Steve Benen
https://washingtonmonthly.com/2011/08/30/its-amazing-ginsburg-is-even-on-the-bench/
The ACLU’s Communist agenda took root 1920:
Note that Norman Thomas founded the National Civil Liberties Bureau during WW I which morphed into the ACLU in 1920. Roger Baldwin, one of the ACLU’s founders, and its first director, laid out the ACLU’s judicial philosophy for all time irrespective of the ACLU barring Communists from leadership and staff positions in 1940. Basically, Baldwin realized that controlling the courts was more important in the long run than was keeping a few easily-identified Communists on the ACLU’s payroll.
I am for socialism, disarmament, and, ultimately, for abolishing the state itself... I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal.
March 24, 2011
ACLU v. Religious Liberty
By J. Matt Barber
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2011/03/aclu_v_religious_liberty.html
ACLU v. Religious Liberty
By J. Matt Barber
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2011/03/aclu_v_religious_liberty.html
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...urg%92s-Embalming-Fluid&p=3221695#post3221695
p.s. More bad news for Democrats:
Supreme Court upholds Arizona death sentence
A sharply divided Supreme Court also upheld the death sentence for an Arizona inmate who was convicted of killing two people in home burglaries nearly 30 years ago.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the court’s conservative justices, rejected the arguments of inmate James Erin McKinney that he deserved a new sentencing hearing so that a jury can decide whether he should face death or life in prison.
He was first sentenced to death by a judge.
The court’s four liberal justices dissented.
A sharply divided Supreme Court also upheld the death sentence for an Arizona inmate who was convicted of killing two people in home burglaries nearly 30 years ago.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the court’s conservative justices, rejected the arguments of inmate James Erin McKinney that he deserved a new sentencing hearing so that a jury can decide whether he should face death or life in prison.
He was first sentenced to death by a judge.
The court’s four liberal justices dissented.
https://www.weau.com/content/news/S...Arizona-death-sentence-568170501.html?ref=501