Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
Imagine, if you will, that, as president, Barack Obama had tweeted out a video of a black couple brandishing guns at peaceful white protestors. Fox “News” would’ve been on the story for the rest of the Obama presidency, and perhaps rightfully so, as the president indicating support for violence against protestors would be a newsworthy event.
Yet in the era of Trump, such a story was buried, with few noticing that, on the heels of tweeting out a video of a supporter shouting “White power!,” Trump tweeted out another of a report from ABC News about a wealthy white couple, Mark and Patricia McCluskey, threatening BLM protestors — whose only weapons appear to be their phones and perhaps a bongo drum — with a handgun and an assault rifle. The McCloskeys, two lawyers who may themselves face legal questions, claim that they felt in danger for their lives. The video certainly doesn’t make it appear so, and why it was necessary for them to point guns at protestors rather than just hold on to them is a question I’d like to hear them answer.
But whatever the motives of the McCloskeys, the motive of the president in tweeting out (and later deleting) the video are abundantly clear: He is again fanning the flames of racial strife by suggesting that peaceful BLM marchers should be met with vigilante violence. Not too surprising, considering that he was fine with gassing protestors himself. He’ll condemn the BLM movement, it appears, much faster than he will alt-right neo-Nazis.
https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion...0200701-5zumhjygabhgfckydm7xyhbm6a-story.html
Yet in the era of Trump, such a story was buried, with few noticing that, on the heels of tweeting out a video of a supporter shouting “White power!,” Trump tweeted out another of a report from ABC News about a wealthy white couple, Mark and Patricia McCluskey, threatening BLM protestors — whose only weapons appear to be their phones and perhaps a bongo drum — with a handgun and an assault rifle. The McCloskeys, two lawyers who may themselves face legal questions, claim that they felt in danger for their lives. The video certainly doesn’t make it appear so, and why it was necessary for them to point guns at protestors rather than just hold on to them is a question I’d like to hear them answer.
But whatever the motives of the McCloskeys, the motive of the president in tweeting out (and later deleting) the video are abundantly clear: He is again fanning the flames of racial strife by suggesting that peaceful BLM marchers should be met with vigilante violence. Not too surprising, considering that he was fine with gassing protestors himself. He’ll condemn the BLM movement, it appears, much faster than he will alt-right neo-Nazis.
https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion...0200701-5zumhjygabhgfckydm7xyhbm6a-story.html