canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
And as usual the incurious Democrat Media Industrial Complex doesn’t inquire or ask serious questions. Her disease is much more advanced and serious than we are being told
Let’s review a few facts based on reporting
1) On November 8th it was reported that Ginsberg fell in her office and broke three ribs on November 7th
2) On December 21st we are told that Ginsberg had two cancerous tumors in her left lung removed but that the cancer hasn’t spread. They say the nodes showed up on X-rays from her broken ribs.
How do I know they are being less than honest? Simple. What they described is not how anyone with lung cancer is treated.
Let’s assume that they are telling the truth about the nodes being found on X-ray as it is a highly plausible story.
Under no circumstances would they have gone from X-ray to surgery AND wait a month and a half to do it. In that intervening time they would have done a biopsy and sent it off to pathology. Pathology can take days to weeks to come back with a report.
The way this is being reported makes it sound like right after the surgery they determined she had cancerous lesions and don’t talk about pathology. Now they do not tell us exactly when the surgery occurred either. They don’t tell us the stage of the cancer. They don’t tell us if she received radiation or chemo prior to surgery to shrink the tumors.
What they want us to believe is that an 85 year old woman with a medical history of two prior cancers has now been surgically treated and cured for lung cancer?
Something just doesn’t add up. It would not surprise me if she makes a surprise ammouncement about retiring and is dead within a year or less.
Let’s review a few facts based on reporting
1) On November 8th it was reported that Ginsberg fell in her office and broke three ribs on November 7th
2) On December 21st we are told that Ginsberg had two cancerous tumors in her left lung removed but that the cancer hasn’t spread. They say the nodes showed up on X-rays from her broken ribs.
How do I know they are being less than honest? Simple. What they described is not how anyone with lung cancer is treated.
Let’s assume that they are telling the truth about the nodes being found on X-ray as it is a highly plausible story.
Under no circumstances would they have gone from X-ray to surgery AND wait a month and a half to do it. In that intervening time they would have done a biopsy and sent it off to pathology. Pathology can take days to weeks to come back with a report.
The way this is being reported makes it sound like right after the surgery they determined she had cancerous lesions and don’t talk about pathology. Now they do not tell us exactly when the surgery occurred either. They don’t tell us the stage of the cancer. They don’t tell us if she received radiation or chemo prior to surgery to shrink the tumors.
What they want us to believe is that an 85 year old woman with a medical history of two prior cancers has now been surgically treated and cured for lung cancer?
Something just doesn’t add up. It would not surprise me if she makes a surprise ammouncement about retiring and is dead within a year or less.
Gary Grumbach @GaryGrumbach