This explains some things

[Darth Omar]

It appears, most likely, someone (aka mysterious tipster), simply told Nunes which dates to review. Hence the Executive Branch SCIF was utilized. The ACTUAL intelligence product itself was the Executive Office Presidential Daily Intelligence Briefing.

Most likely a Clapper (ODNI), Rogers (NSA), Comey (FBI Counter Intel), and Brennan (CIA) work product. Remember, President Obama preferred written intel briefings which he reviewed from his secure iPad.

https://theconservativetreehouse.co...-to-every-nunes-public-statement-in-sequence/
_____________

It was kind of curious that Nunes went to the WH to meet his source. But Nunes' source was only telling him which dates to view on the daily intelligence briefings that are subject to the SCIF directive.

That intelligence isn't supposed to be transported from one site to another, so Nunes viewed it there. Why go to the trouble of moving it?

And since it was part of the POTUS daily intelligence briefings, Obama was aware that a crime was being committed in unmasking US citizens. As were Brennen and Comey.

But I expect this to go exactly no where.

 

[Althea]

It appears, most likely, someone (aka mysterious tipster), simply told Nunes which dates to review. Hence the Executive Branch SCIF was utilized. The ACTUAL intelligence product itself was the Executive Office Presidential Daily Intelligence Briefing.

Most likely a Clapper (ODNI), Rogers (NSA), Comey (FBI Counter Intel), and Brennan (CIA) work product. Remember, President Obama preferred written intel briefings which he reviewed from his secure iPad.

https://theconservativetreehouse.co...-to-every-nunes-public-statement-in-sequence/
_____________

It was kind of curious that Nunes went to the WH to meet his source. But Nunes' source was only telling him which dates to view on the daily intelligence briefings that are subject to the SCIF directive.

That intelligence isn't supposed to be transported from one site to another, so Nunes viewed it there. Why go to the trouble of moving it?

And since it was part of the POTUS daily intelligence briefings, Obama was aware that a crime was being committed in unmasking US citizens. As were Brennen and Comey.

But I expect this to go exactly no where.

Yea...sure. That explains everything. Except the reason for Nunes' actions after getting this super secret stuff. Why didn't trump already have this?

And why did Nunes tip off POTUS, if his job is to investigate him/his staff?

 

[anatta]

They are trying to hustle him out of the Committee too -
ridiculous crap like briefing POTUS ( does that CHANGE any documents?) while leaking @ Trump at the same time.

The Deep State will not tolerate pushback. And they got the partisan Dems happily along for the ride because
well after all killing Trump is more important then insurrection by the IC isn't it?

I got a feeling the leakers will get away with it all..

 

[anatta]

Yea...sure. That explains everything. Except the reason for Nunes' actions after getting this super secret stuff. Why didn't trump already have this?

And why did Nunes tip off POTUS, if his job is to investigate him/his staff?

why would Trump think to look thru Obama's PDB's?
The IC leadership is not going to help Trump ( the politicized appointments under Obama)

 

[anatta]

how could he use a SCIF in Congress -when the doc were executive branch at the executive branch?

 

[Micawber]

They are trying to hustle him out of the Committee too -
ridiculous crap like briefing POTUS ( does that CHANGE any documents?) while leaking @ Trump at the same time.

The Deep State will not tolerate pushback. And they got the partisan Dems happily along for the ride because
well after all killing Trump is more important then insurrection by the IC isn't it?

I got a feeling the leakers will get away with it all..

U lub u sum Trump. It's all you do. Defend the lump. Tell, me, do you actually watch Fox now? Seems like it.

 

[anatta]

U lub u sum Trump. It's all you do. Defend the lump. Tell, me, do you actually watch Fox now? Seems like it.

Watching the coffee klath on Morning Joe ( which has become a Miki led joke)..
the rest of your baby talk i cannot decipher..

You have shown an inability to follow the dots on the IC leadership.

 

[anatta]

now the complaint by Ignatius (Morning Joe) is the IC leadership didn't see fit to share it with Congress -
and Nunes "taking upon himself to take action" is somehow the problem.

 

[Micawber]

Nobody can tell me a person is doing his duty to investigate when that person sneaks off to tip off the suspect and makes rehearsed press remarks, all before providing the info to his committee.

 

[Micawber]

Watching the coffee klath on Morning Joe ( which has become a Miki led joke)..
the rest of your baby talk i cannot decipher..

You have shown an inability to follow the dots on the IC leadership.

You simply post like any right wing Fox consumer. All the exact same talking points all the time. You are indistinguishable to Sean Hannity, except for your lack of intelligence. It's just strange, you used to be BAC's fluffer for YEARS and resident dissident second in command. To see you morph into a right wing IDIOT is just weird.

 

[anatta]

Nobody can tell me a person is doing his duty to investigate when that person sneaks off to tip off the suspect and makes rehearsed press remarks, all before providing the info to his committee.

bullshit. "tipping off?" so what would Trump be able to do,and why would he do it? by notification if the docs were favorable to Trump? Do you see how dumb/illogical partisanship makes you?

 

[anatta]

You simply post like any right wing Fox consumer. All the exact same talking points all the time. You are indistinguishable to Sean Hannity, except for your lack of intelligence. It's just strange, you used to be BAC's fluffer for YEARS and resident dissident second in command. To see you morph into a right wing IDIOT is just weird.

blah blah blah.."i got nothing to say" ..lol @ you

 

[Micawber]

blah blah blah.."i got nothing to say" ..lol @ you

No, not blah blah blah.

You simply post like any right wing Fox consumer. All the exact same talking points all the time. You are indistinguishable to Sean Hannity, except for your lack of intelligence. It's just strange, you used to be BAC's fluffer for YEARS and resident dissident second in command. To see you morph into a right wing IDIOT is just weird.

All accurate assessment ^^^ You don't like it, I know. But it's true. I know I'm a moderate to liberal and absolutely am DISGUSTED by what Republicans are with Trump, Palin. Booooooosh, Tea Baggers climate change denial, etc., evolution denial wing coopting that party. That has not changed a bit.

Nobody could compare your socialist blatherings on DC Junkies and believe you were the same person. You were all about upending the "duopoly," not into constant defense and promotion AT ANY COST TO REASON of this orange haired plutocratic demagogic conman liar Republitard.

You disliked Republicans. Explain.

 

[Althea]

Nobody can tell me a person is doing his duty to investigate when that person sneaks off to tip off the suspect and makes rehearsed press remarks, all before providing the info to his committee.

And then canceling testimony from the woman who will blow the lid off of this whole affair.

 

[Micawber]

And then canceling testimony from the woman who will blow the lid off of this whole affair.

Cool, who is she?

OK I looked up Sally Yates. What exactly do you think she knows in addition to the Flynn thing?

 

[Althea]

No, not blah blah blah.

You simply post like any right wing Fox consumer. All the exact same talking points all the time. You are indistinguishable to Sean Hannity, except for your lack of intelligence. It's just strange, you used to be BAC's fluffer for YEARS and resident dissident second in command. To see you morph into a right wing IDIOT is just weird.

All accurate assessment ^^^ You don't like it, I know. But it's true. I know I'm a moderate to liberal and absolutely am DISGUSTED by what Republicans are with Trump, Palin. Booooooosh, Tea Baggers climate change denial, etc., evolution denial wing coopting that party. That has not changed a bit.

Nobody could compare your socialist blatherings on DC Junkies and believe you were the same person. You were all about upending the "duopoly," not into constant defense and promotion AT ANY COST TO REASON of this orange haired plutocratic demagogic conman liar Republitard.

You disliked Republicans. Explain.

It's even more disappointing when you've known him for even longer. It boggles the mind. Fine...he changed ideology because he simply cannot get past his hatred for Clinton.

But the talk of 'deep state' is the most disappointing, especially given all the facts on the table despite trump's extreme actions to hide the truth.

 

[Darth Omar]

Yea...sure. That explains everything. Except the reason for Nunes' actions after getting this super secret stuff. Why didn't trump already have this?

And why did Nunes tip off POTUS, if his job is to investigate him/his staff?

This has nothing to do with the Russian theory or the Russian investigation.

Trump and/or his staff would be the victims so it makes sense that Nunes would go to Trump first. In any event, it's an attempt to distract from *the fact* a felony was committed within the IC---against Trump and his campaign.

And if the actual source [not the whistle blower] is from the Daily Intelligence Briefings, Obama, Brennen, Comey and Rogers are all implicated.

When people say this could be bigger than Watergate they aren't being hyperbolic.

 

[Phantasmal]

This has nothing to do with the Russian theory or the Russian investigation.

Trump and/or his staff would be the victims so it makes sense that Nunes would go to Trump first. In any event, it's an attempt to distract from *the fact* a felony was committed within the IC---against Trump and his campaign.

And if the actual source [not the whistle blower] is from the Daily Intelligence Briefings, Obama, Brennen, Comey and Rogers are all implicated.

When people say this could be bigger than Watergate they aren't being hyperbolic.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/...n-nunes-surveillance-white-house-trump-236577

 

[Micawber]

This has nothing to do with the Russian theory or the Russian investigation.

Trump and/or his staff would be the victims so it makes sense that Nunes would go to Trump first. In any event, it's an attempt to distract from *the fact* a felony was committed within the IC---against Trump and his campaign.

And if the actual source [not the whistle blower] is from the Daily Intelligence Briefings, Obama, Brennen, Comey and Rogers are all implicated.

When people say this could be bigger than Watergate they aren't being hyperbolic.

"Would be victims?" These are past events. Good to know the Fox spin doctoring in less than 30 words, though, without having to suffer through that rubbish.

 

[Althea]

Cool, who is she?

OK I looked up Sally Yates. What exactly do you think she knows in addition to the Flynn thing?

I believe the Flynn thing is the lid on Pandora's Box. trump seems to think that the Flynn firing put the issue to rest. Yates would re open the issue, and the record would show that trump knowingly let a Turkish operative sit in on classified briefings. Clearly, Flynn was also acting as a Russian operative, not unlike Manafort.

trump wants this to be about Flynn 'lying' to Pence. The reality is that Flynn is up to his ears in this Russia issue.

We're learning that when anyone in the trump administration says 'I had one meeting', that means "I'll only admit to the ones that have been discovered'.


Now we see that his son in law is doing business with the most corrupt bank in Russia. He too only admitted to one 'meeting/call'. We now know that it isn't true, and he lied about the nature of the contacts.