This is Not Going To End Well For Some Occupiers

SmarterThanYou said:
do you have the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure in your person, effects, and papers if the FBI can hand a financial institution a letter to dig up your records with no warrant? or that the DoJ can search your home without your knowledge and get a warrant 3 days later? is that 'reasonable' to you?
Click to expand...

lol.....they aren't releasing anything to the government that they don't already sell to telemarketers without ever notifying you........and they can't search your home without a warrant....that tired bullshit won't fly.....
 
SmarterThanYou said:
you've been on here long enough to see the things i post. nothing in my history of government abuse is wrong to you?
Click to expand...

lol, I stopped reading the threads you start a long time ago.....there's never anything legitimate in them.....honestly, you must spend all your free time searching for "bad cop" stories......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
lol.....they aren't releasing anything to the government that they don't already sell to telemarketers without ever notifying you........and they can't search your home without a warrant....that tired bullshit won't fly.....
Click to expand...

“Sneak & Peek” Warrants

This section allows for "delayed notice" of search warrants, which means the FBI can search a home or business without immediately notifying the target of the investigation. The Justice Department says this provision has already allowed investigators to search the houses of drug dealers and other criminals without providing notice that might have jeopardized an investigation. Investigators still have to explain why they want to delay notice, and must eventually tell the target about the search.

Critics say that investigators already had the power to conduct secret searches in counterterror and counterespionage probes. The Patriot Act, they say, authorized the use of this technique for any crime, no matter how minor. They say that "sneak and peek" searches should be narrowly limited to cases in which an investigation would be seriously jeopardized by immediate notice. Legislation to cut off funding for such searches passed the House in 2003. However, this provision does not face a sunset as other controversial provisions do, so it may be harder for opponents to amend it.

sure glad that's tired bullshit.......or is it really happening?

does the constitution restrict the government or does it restrict the people and corporations?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
lol, I stopped reading the threads you start a long time ago.....there's never anything legitimate in them.....honestly, you must spend all your free time searching for "bad cop" stories......
Click to expand...
ah, so you're another badge blower. tells me all i need to know about you then. you've never read the constitution. you could have just said that awhile back. would have saved me a lot of typing to you.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
“Sneak & Peek” Warrants

This section allows for "delayed notice" of search warrants, which means the FBI can search a home or business without immediately notifying the target of the investigation. The Justice Department says this provision has already allowed investigators to search the houses of drug dealers and other criminals without providing notice that might have jeopardized an investigation. Investigators still have to explain why they want to delay notice, and must eventually tell the target about the search.

Critics say that investigators already had the power to conduct secret searches in counterterror and counterespionage probes. The Patriot Act, they say, authorized the use of this technique for any crime, no matter how minor. They say that "sneak and peek" searches should be narrowly limited to cases in which an investigation would be seriously jeopardized by immediate notice. Legislation to cut off funding for such searches passed the House in 2003. However, this provision does not face a sunset as other controversial provisions do, so it may be harder for opponents to amend it.

sure glad that's tired bullshit.......or is it really happening?

does the constitution restrict the government or does it restrict the people and corporations?
Click to expand...

provide a link or don't bother to post...as it is, it appears you're ashamed of your source...I also notice that despite your claim, there's no mention of it happening without a warrant.....primarily because your claim it happens without a warrant is out and out false.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
lol....so based on the NPR article you've argued that Sneak and Peak WARRANTS are done without warrants?......good one.....

so your sources are NPR, the Annenberg Foundation and the ACLU......that tells me all I need to know about you.....
Click to expand...

and your response tells me all I need to know about you. hope your GOP tit doesn't dry up.
 
Alias said:
You forgot Abe Lincoln. He's with us also.

You've learned the leftist tricks very well. We don't "Ignore the Constitution" when it suits us. There happens to be an enemy on our soil plotting day and night to murder us. I'm not going to "IGNORE" that. That's what you don't want to talk about.
Click to expand...

No, Alias Abe is not with you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top