I liked what I heard in his address to his staff so far and his joke about the Prayer Breakfast, I hope he has more sense and it looks like he does, than #45.
This is the problem with the lunatic left....they make knee jerk emotional conclusions void of any objective evidences. And they legislate in the same faulty manner.
Take for instance the march on DC over the SCOTUS nomination of President Trump. They were marching around with signs that made statements void of the picks actual name...which was filled in with a sharpie After the pick. Proving what? They were going to stage a dog and phony show regardless of who the President picked as the sings were all manufactured void of the name...to be filled in when they actually knew who they were protesting.
I liked what I heard in his address to his staff so far and his joke about the Prayer Breakfast, I hope he has more sense and it looks like he does, than #45.
The evidence of actual, real world experience and effectiveness seems to scare libs.
I don't understand this.
Appointing well known, perennial political hangers on seems to comfort the Dems. They think that the ability to lie in public, as a politician using party cliches and tired slogans is experience.
Actually having managed a company with a staff of thousands is dismissed.
What is the thought pattern of the typical lib that can't understand what director level experience actually is?