Diogenes
Nemo me impune lacessit
Pulling the U.S. out of the Paris Climate Agreement isn’t enough to fight climate change hysteria.
The next Democrat President would just rejoin the accord. It gets us nowhere.
There needs to be a serious audit of the quality of “climate science” coming out of several intergovernmental agencies including the EPA and especially NASA, if not a complete shutdown of their climate research divisions and withdrawal from the UNFCCC.
There needs to be serious investigation into the ethics of the IPCC, and potentially a climate report done by top scientists assembled by the current administration to provide a level-headed assessment of the issue that is separate from the National Climate Assessment (NCA).
Any and all atmospheric and climate-related research should be delegated to NOAA and USGS (both of which are organizations I love). There are too many duplicity efforts that are a giant waste of taxpayer funds.
Sure, NASA does have satellites, which gives them an interest in meteorology, but they can provide the tools for other scientists to use.
The data doesn’t need to be analyzed by them.
I don’t mind if they fund climate research through giving grants to NOAA scientists or universities, but I am not convinced we need teams of researchers at NASA working on climate-related issues given there are scientists at NOAA, universities and in the private sector who can easily do those tasks.
NASA was established by the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 that President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed into law. Their focus is supposed to be space exploration, aeronautics and aerospace engineering.
Climate doesn’t fall under that umbrella. We haven’t had a manned mission to the moon since 1972.
Why? They haven’t attempted to go to Mars? Why?
You can be mad at me all you want, but we can find numerous examples of this in other areas of science and policy. Too many people working on the same thing. That bloats our bureaucracy, leads to less government efficiency and it plants the seeds for unethical behavior. If it is a lot more concentrated, it can be monitored.
Just my opinion.
The next Democrat President would just rejoin the accord. It gets us nowhere.
There needs to be a serious audit of the quality of “climate science” coming out of several intergovernmental agencies including the EPA and especially NASA, if not a complete shutdown of their climate research divisions and withdrawal from the UNFCCC.
There needs to be serious investigation into the ethics of the IPCC, and potentially a climate report done by top scientists assembled by the current administration to provide a level-headed assessment of the issue that is separate from the National Climate Assessment (NCA).
Any and all atmospheric and climate-related research should be delegated to NOAA and USGS (both of which are organizations I love). There are too many duplicity efforts that are a giant waste of taxpayer funds.
Sure, NASA does have satellites, which gives them an interest in meteorology, but they can provide the tools for other scientists to use.
The data doesn’t need to be analyzed by them.
I don’t mind if they fund climate research through giving grants to NOAA scientists or universities, but I am not convinced we need teams of researchers at NASA working on climate-related issues given there are scientists at NOAA, universities and in the private sector who can easily do those tasks.
NASA was established by the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 that President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed into law. Their focus is supposed to be space exploration, aeronautics and aerospace engineering.
Climate doesn’t fall under that umbrella. We haven’t had a manned mission to the moon since 1972.
Why? They haven’t attempted to go to Mars? Why?
You can be mad at me all you want, but we can find numerous examples of this in other areas of science and policy. Too many people working on the same thing. That bloats our bureaucracy, leads to less government efficiency and it plants the seeds for unethical behavior. If it is a lot more concentrated, it can be monitored.
Just my opinion.