OrnotBitwise
Watermelon
On impulse, I just did some quick digging. It turns out that the recent trend is far from the aberation some Republican partisans would have it. In fact, the Republican Congresses of the past 12 years have actually included fewer military veterans than more liberal, Democrat dominated Congresses traditionally have.
In the Post Newt era, military veterans have generally made up only about 31% of Congress. That's far less than was traditionally the case in recent Democrat dominated Congresses. So this month's surge of Democratic congress people who are also veterans is nothing new or surprising.
The thing is, though, that military veterans make up less than 12% of the adult population. While I have nothing against veterans serving in Congress and have voted for many over the years, I question whether it is in the bet interests of the nation for such a small minority so heavily over-represented in the legislative branch.
Among us liberals, there's a commonly held belief that veterans are less likely to support aggressive military adventures than are non-veterans. The relative pausity of veterans in the past 6 Republican dominated Congresses lends support to this idea. Still, the immensely bloated number of veterans in Congress over the past 40 years leads me to question the validity of the principle.
In the Post Newt era, military veterans have generally made up only about 31% of Congress. That's far less than was traditionally the case in recent Democrat dominated Congresses. So this month's surge of Democratic congress people who are also veterans is nothing new or surprising.
The thing is, though, that military veterans make up less than 12% of the adult population. While I have nothing against veterans serving in Congress and have voted for many over the years, I question whether it is in the bet interests of the nation for such a small minority so heavily over-represented in the legislative branch.
Among us liberals, there's a commonly held belief that veterans are less likely to support aggressive military adventures than are non-veterans. The relative pausity of veterans in the past 6 Republican dominated Congresses lends support to this idea. Still, the immensely bloated number of veterans in Congress over the past 40 years leads me to question the validity of the principle.