Toxic Women and Patriarchy

ThatOwlWoman

Leftist Vermin
Warning: This article will trigger you if you are a RW male, a female supporter of RW males, a rapist apologist, or a Dr. Ford-is-a-lying-rejected-bitch-and-so-was-Anita-Hill-and-every-other-rape-accuser believer.
~~~
The most notable toxically feminine phenomena are male validated women -- also known as “Pick-Mes”. A pick-me is a woman whom desires the validation of men to the point of promoting and agreeing with sexist standards, all to be praised by sexist men and hopefully be chosen by a “worthy” sexist men. Pick me women rely on respectability politics, slut shaming, and constant comparisons of themselves to “lesser” women. These women are toxic because they also dabble in promotion of rape culture, victim blaming, and promote the idea that submission patriarchy is better for women than having control of their own life. They promote the ideas that women are meant to be nothing more than breeders, maids, and cooks to men and that a woman’s own personal goals and ambitions are secondary to those of men.

These women are also usually complicit in the protection of abusers in their communities from due justice and turn a blind eye to abuses committed by men around them- sometimes even towards their own children in favor of those abusive men. There have been many stories of women who allowed their children to be sexually abused by a boyfriend, or of women who set another woman up to be sexually assaulted by men. Women who witness violent or sexual crimes against their communities by these men and refuse to cooperate with justice to protect these men are examples of pick-mes.

Another form of toxic femininity is the act of gossiping; passive aggressive via the spreading of rumors and intended personal information in order to maliciously defame another woman. While celebrity gossip is a very popular American past time, the average celebrity profits off of having his or her name being a part of the public consciousness, but when it comes to woman to woman personal relationships- the sharing of business that was meant to be private can have serious social consequences in a society that is sexist, as well as being hurtful to someone who has trusted you with this information. Many women are aware of this and have at some point weaponized the private business and sexual pursuits of a woman against her in the hopes of damaging her reputation.

Source: https://medium.com/@CleoJ/yes-there-is-a-toxic-femininity-9f9afaef0587

~~~

We have all seen certain women here on JPP doing exactly the above, in order to slam Dr. Ford and support Kavanaugh -- even though there is no one here who knows anything about either of these two people or their lives and the alleged incident. Ladies, if you see yourself in this excerpt, ask yourself if that is you. I'm doing the same. Guys, ask yourselves if you want the support of women like this, or would you prefer someone w/o an agenda.
 
I think the whole situation is political theater to gin up the Democrat base to vote in November. Whatever happened between two highschoolers I don't think is the Main Goal here. Republicans in the past have become OUTRAGED about one thing or another every month or two in the past and it seems to gin up their base. The Democrats may have picked up on this strategy and are using it right before the November elections. Last election, 2016, the Democrats fell asleep at the wheel and we ended up with Trump. I think this is being used as a tactic to make sure every Democrat understands what is at stake here.
 
I think the whole situation is political theater to gin up the Democrat base to vote in November. Whatever happened between two highschoolers I don't think is the Main Goal here. Republicans in the past have become OUTRAGED about one thing or another every month or two in the past and it seems to gin up their base. The Democrats may have picked up on this strategy and are using it right before the November elections. Last election, 2016, the Democrats fell asleep at the wheel and we ended up with Trump. I think this is being used as a tactic to make sure every Democrat understands what is at stake here.

Democrats don't want a sexual deviant on the SC,like we have in the Oval office.
 
I think the whole situation is political theater to gin up the Democrat base to vote in November. Whatever happened between two highschoolers I don't think is the Main Goal here. Republicans in the past have become OUTRAGED about one thing or another every month or two in the past and it seems to gin up their base. The Democrats may have picked up on this strategy and are using it right before the November elections. Last election, 2016, the Democrats fell asleep at the wheel and we ended up with Trump. I think this is being used as a tactic to make sure every Democrat understands what is at stake here.

Of course your opinion is noted, and disregarded since you didn't address the OP concept. In other words, you're avoiding the issue of Attack The Victim.
 
Democrats don't want a sexual deviant on the SC,like we have in the Oval office.

Democrats don't want a Conservative/Religious Partisan as a Supreme Court Judge. The best way to prevent that is to retake the House and Senate. As it is, the Republican Senate can just ram these Kavanaugh types down the throats of Democrats at will.
 
Apparently one of our most fervently ignorant Reichwingers, USFreakdumb, has been triggered by my thread and started its own Part 2 version whining and crying and gnashing its stubby teeth in frustration. Poor dumb beast.
 
Apparently one of our most fervently ignorant Reichwingers, USFreakdumb, has been triggered by my thread and started its own Part 2 version whining and crying and gnashing its stubby teeth in frustration. Poor dumb beast.

They know their time of control is coming to an end
 
Of course your opinion is noted, and disregarded since you didn't address the OP concept. In other words, you're avoiding the issue of Attack The Victim.


You're giving an opinion on the current Kavanaugh spectacle. I'm giving MY opinion on the Kavanaugh spectacle. I think both Red Team/Blue Team are aware of this. Red Team wants to look fair and judicious, Blue Team wants to drag this out as long as possible. I think whatever happened in High School between these two isn't as important as the voter turnout in November.

If you prefer, I won't post on this thread again.
 
Democrats don't want a Conservative/Religious Partisan as a Supreme Court Judge. The best way to prevent that is to retake the House and Senate. As it is, the Republican Senate can just ram these Kavanaugh types down the throats of Democrats at will.

You are still avoiding the issue, Jack. Of all people -- Jack who loathes and attacks liberal women constantly -- why are you avoiding the premise of this thread? Why do you think that "Pick ME" women choose to attack the victims of sexual assault allegations? Surely YOU should have an opinion on that, given your history of going after assertive non-victim women.
 
You're giving an opinion on the current Kavanaugh spectacle. I'm giving MY opinion on the Kavanaugh spectacle. I think both Red Team/Blue Team are aware of this. Red Team wants to look fair and judicious, Blue Team wants to drag this out as long as possible. I think whatever happened in High School between these two isn't as important as the voter turnout in November.

If you prefer, I won't post on this thread again.

Nope. I'm quoting an article on why some women attack other women for speaking out against sexual attacks. YOU are trying to turn this into a specific discussion.
 
If you prefer, I won't post on this thread again.

I don't care if you post or don't post, I'm not into censorship despite your whines to the contrary. Post as you will. Let's keep on the topic though and stop digressing to a single issue (Ford vs Kavanaugh).
 
I think the whole situation is political theater to gin up the Democrat base to vote in November. Whatever happened between two highschoolers I don't think is the Main Goal here. Republicans in the past have become OUTRAGED about one thing or another every month or two in the past and it seems to gin up their base. The Democrats may have picked up on this strategy and are using it right before the November elections. Last election, 2016, the Democrats fell asleep at the wheel and we ended up with Trump. I think this is being used as a tactic to make sure every Democrat understands what is at stake here.

repubs did not have to run this nomination now. they could have waited until after the election. This urgency is caused by rightys. the crisis is republican made. the dems are playing defense against the power of the right. Truth is the Repubs should have taken time to vet their choice. They just assumed they could run him through and move on.
 
Apparently one of our most fervently ignorant Reichwingers, USFreakdumb, has been triggered by my thread and started its own Part 2 version whining and crying and gnashing its stubby teeth in frustration. Poor dumb beast.

@ post 1 - A timely topic.

This seems to be fertile ground for research in the social sciences.

I have read a few articles along these lines in recent months; aka, why do substantial numbers of white women support alleged pedophile Roy Moore, alleged Rapist Kavanaugh, and known pussy grabber President Man-baby.

One premise I have seen is that ignorant white women think they have nothing to gain by forming coalitions with black and brown women, since those groups have nothing to offer (in the view of ignorant white women). These female mouth-breathers view their only path to prestige, privilege, and a share in power is by hitching their wagons to racist white men, rapists, and evidently pedophiles (given white women support of Roy Moore)

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opini...emale-voters-are-part-long-history-ncna827976
 
You are still avoiding the issue, Jack. Of all people -- Jack who loathes and attacks liberal women constantly -- why are you avoiding the premise of this thread? Why do you think that "Pick ME" women choose to attack the victims of sexual assault allegations? Surely YOU should have an opinion on that, given your history of going after assertive non-victim women.


hahahahaha ... I like 'liberal' women, they like to fuck. The conservative/religious types, not so much. So, we both know THAT statement of yours is utter nonsense.

I really don't know any women who are defending Kavanaugh, so I can't really give an informed opinion on that.
 
I don't care if you post or don't post, I'm not into censorship despite your whines to the contrary. Post as you will. Let's keep on the topic though and stop digressing to a single issue (Ford vs Kavanaugh).

Cool. My (Jack's) opinion isn't "Ford vs Kavanaugh", ... MY opinion is that this is a Red Team/Blue Team issue. It's Political Theater being presented to the General Public for political reasons (Get out the Vote).
 
Nope. I'm quoting an article on why some women attack other women for speaking out against sexual attacks. YOU are trying to turn this into a specific discussion.

Oh. I have no idea why women would do that. I haven't met any women who do that. Are you sure this is an actual fact? You're not just coming up with some false narrative here, are you? Why would any woman be FOR 'sexual attacks'?
 
Democrats don't want a Conservative/Religious Partisan as a Supreme Court Judge. The best way to prevent that is to retake the House and Senate. As it is, the Republican Senate can just ram these Kavanaugh types down the throats of Democrats at will.

Pretty much
 
repubs did not have to run this nomination now. they could have waited until after the election. This urgency is caused by rightys. the crisis is republican made. the dems are playing defense against the power of the right. Truth is the Repubs should have taken time to vet their choice. They just assumed they could run him through and move on.

The Republicans don't want to chance they can't get this conservative/religious Partisan on the Court, why would they wait? Are you crazy?
 
Oh. I have no idea why women would do that. I haven't met any women who do that. Are you sure this is an actual fact? You're not just coming up with some false narrative here, are you? Why would any woman be FOR 'sexual attacks'?

Top supporters all male attackers
 
Back
Top