Treason!!

floridafan

Verified User
During an appearance on MSNBC on Sunday morning with host Katie Phang, former federal prosecutor Glenn Kirschner explained that there is more than enough evidence for the Department of Justice to charge Donald Trump with treason.

Going well beyond calls for the former president to be charged with criminal conspiracy as many legal experts have called for, Kirschner said there is ample evidence that Trump "declared war" on the U.S.

"You said he's guilty. Donald Trump is guilty of treason. Some people have said maybe that's a little too far to, Glenn. Tell us why it's not," host Phang prompted.

"I don't think it's hyperbole and here's why, Katie," he replied. "Five quick data points that I think demonstrate Donald Trump levied war against the United States, that's the very definition of treason; whoever owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them, the United States, is guilty of treason."

"He recruited the Proud Boys and others, 'stand back and stand by, await before their orders.' He set the date for the Capitol attack, 'come to DC January 6th, will be wild.' He deployed them, and he gave the order: 'go to the Capitol, fight like hell or you won't have a country anymore,' go stop the certification."

"He used the word 'steal', which is helpful because it helps expose his corrupt intent," he added. "He then sat in the White House dining room for three hours, watching the attack with people streaming in begging him to call off his attack dogs and he wouldn't. And we know they asked him to send reinforcements to the Capitol to defend the people who were under attack and he refused."

"Mike Pence finally had to give the order to send reinforcements, an order he made that he didn't have the authority to give," he elaborated. "And now we know Donald Trump also sided with the supporters, saying maybe mike pence should be hanged."
https://www.rawstory.com/donald-trump-2657531097/
 
During an appearance on MSNBC on Sunday morning with host Katie Phang, former federal prosecutor Glenn Kirschner explained that there is more than enough evidence for the Department of Justice to charge Donald Trump with treason.

Going well beyond calls for the former president to be charged with criminal conspiracy as many legal experts have called for, Kirschner said there is ample evidence that Trump "declared war" on the U.S.

"You said he's guilty. Donald Trump is guilty of treason. Some people have said maybe that's a little too far to, Glenn. Tell us why it's not," host Phang prompted.

"I don't think it's hyperbole and here's why, Katie," he replied. "Five quick data points that I think demonstrate Donald Trump levied war against the United States, that's the very definition of treason; whoever owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them, the United States, is guilty of treason."

"He recruited the Proud Boys and others, 'stand back and stand by, await before their orders.' He set the date for the Capitol attack, 'come to DC January 6th, will be wild.' He deployed them, and he gave the order: 'go to the Capitol, fight like hell or you won't have a country anymore,' go stop the certification."

"He used the word 'steal', which is helpful because it helps expose his corrupt intent," he added. "He then sat in the White House dining room for three hours, watching the attack with people streaming in begging him to call off his attack dogs and he wouldn't. And we know they asked him to send reinforcements to the Capitol to defend the people who were under attack and he refused."

"Mike Pence finally had to give the order to send reinforcements, an order he made that he didn't have the authority to give," he elaborated. "And now we know Donald Trump also sided with the supporters, saying maybe mike pence should be hanged."
https://www.rawstory.com/donald-trump-2657531097/

I watch Glenn's YouTubes frequently. Smart guy.
 
Did everyone see the video of Juan Guaido being attacked again by the people of Venezuela?
 
During an appearance on MSNBC on Sunday morning with host Katie Phang, former federal prosecutor Glenn Kirschner explained that there is more than enough evidence for the Department of Justice to charge Donald Trump with treason.

Going well beyond calls for the former president to be charged with criminal conspiracy as many legal experts have called for, Kirschner said there is ample evidence that Trump "declared war" on the U.S.

"You said he's guilty. Donald Trump is guilty of treason. Some people have said maybe that's a little too far to, Glenn. Tell us why it's not," host Phang prompted.

"I don't think it's hyperbole and here's why, Katie," he replied. "Five quick data points that I think demonstrate Donald Trump levied war against the United States, that's the very definition of treason; whoever owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them, the United States, is guilty of treason."

"He recruited the Proud Boys and others, 'stand back and stand by, await before their orders.' He set the date for the Capitol attack, 'come to DC January 6th, will be wild.' He deployed them, and he gave the order: 'go to the Capitol, fight like hell or you won't have a country anymore,' go stop the certification."

"He used the word 'steal', which is helpful because it helps expose his corrupt intent," he added. "He then sat in the White House dining room for three hours, watching the attack with people streaming in begging him to call off his attack dogs and he wouldn't. And we know they asked him to send reinforcements to the Capitol to defend the people who were under attack and he refused."

"Mike Pence finally had to give the order to send reinforcements, an order he made that he didn't have the authority to give," he elaborated. "And now we know Donald Trump also sided with the supporters, saying maybe mike pence should be hanged."
https://www.rawstory.com/donald-trump-2657531097/

This is a great example of why liars... err, lawyers... have such a bad reputation. It's amazing how they can graduate high school, go to 6 to 8 years of college, and end up stupider than when they left high school...
 
This is a great example of why liars... err, lawyers... have such a bad reputation. It's amazing how they can graduate high school, go to 6 to 8 years of college, and end up stupider than when they left high school...

Convienent. Not addressing the points but instead attacking people. That is ad hominem.
 
Convienent. Not addressing the points but instead attacking people. That is ad hominem.

Ad hominem is To the man. That is I address the post to the poster I'm quoting. I didn't do that here. It's a combination of sarcasm and parody meant to belittle and ridicule the article as meaningless because it was said by a lair...err, lawyer. Damn that's hard to get correct!
 
Ad hominem is To the man. That is I address the post to the poster I'm quoting. I didn't do that here. It's a combination of sarcasm and parody meant to belittle and ridicule the article as meaningless because it was said by a lair...err, lawyer. Damn that's hard to get correct!

You attacked the lawyer instead of points.
 
You attacked the lawyer instead of points.

I can do that. The lawyer didn't post anything. Also my post didn't address directly anything she said but rather attacked her chosen profession.

Oh,

5be82f717a890bcc2bf945840842b03d.jpg
 
I can do that. The lawyer didn't post anything. Also my post didn't address directly anything she said but rather attacked her chosen profession.

Oh,

5be82f717a890bcc2bf945840842b03d.jpg

The lawyer is the one making the argument; not the OP. Therefore the "man" is the lawyer. "To the man." Therefore it is an ad hominem. That makes the lawyer more intelligent and educated than you. Oh whoops that's also an ad hominem too. :laugh:
 
Trump said publicly he would pardon all the people who attacked the capital



How is that not a support of the violence
 
Let’s just remember the glee trumpit assholes scream chanted LOCK HER UP with



NO trial needed for Hilary in their minds



But lawyers are bad for knowing the law
 
The lawyer is the one making the argument; not the OP. Therefore the "man" is the lawyer. "To the man." Therefore it is an ad hominem. That makes the lawyer more intelligent and educated than you. Oh whoops that's also an ad hominem too. :laugh:

I didn't address my comments to her either. Not ad hominem.
 
I didn't address my comments to her either. Not ad hominem.

This is your post:

This is a great example of why liars... err, lawyers... have such a bad reputation. It's amazing how they can graduate high school, go to 6 to 8 years of college, and end up stupider than when they left high school...

You called him a liar and stupid (err more stupid after he left high school).
 
This is your post:

You called him a liar and stupid (err more stupid after he left high school).

You failed high school English didn't you? I called no one specifically anything. the nouns that are the subject of the first sentence are, "liars" and "lawyers." In the second sentence, "they" the noun and subject refers back to the first sentence.

That doesn't address any particular liar or lawyer but rather them as a whole. Not ad hominem.
 
You failed high school English didn't you? I called no one specifically anything. the nouns that are the subject of the first sentence are, "liars" and "lawyers." In the second sentence, "they" the noun and subject refers back to the first sentence.

That doesn't address any particular liar or lawyer but rather them as a whole. Not ad hominem.

So you had no point with your statement? You're just throwing shit in hope something will stick in order to avoid discussing the topic?
 
Back
Top