Trump, 79, Hides Limp After Admitting to Health Concerns

Guno צְבִי

Guno צְבִי

We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
Donald Trump may now be having trouble walking across flat surfaces.

The president appeared to be hiding a slight limp as he was filmed walking with his wife, Melania, at Mar-a-Lago.

The new speculation over the 79-year-old’s health came after he revealed in an interview that he tried compression socks for his swollen ankles and used makeup to cover the bruising on his hands caused by large daily doses of aspirin.

The popular anti-Trump X account Call to Activism posted a clip of Trump appearing to drag his right leg as he walked down a runway toward the press gathered to snap attendees of his ritzy New Year’s Eve party.

news.yahoo.com

Trump, 79, Hides Limp After Admitting to Health Concerns

Donald Trump may now be having trouble walking across flat surfaces. The president appeared to be hiding a slight limp as he was filmed walking with his wife, Melania, at Mar-a-Lago. The new speculation over the 79-year-old’s health came after he revealed in an interview that he tried...
news.yahoo.com news.yahoo.com
 
Guno צְבִי said:
On Monday, the nearly octogenarian president had difficulty descending four small steps at Mar-a-Lago. On multiple occasions, he has descended the steps on Air Force One at a snail’s pace.
Click to expand...

NBC News reported on his "concerns" last night and quoted him directly. It was just more of the denial and bullshit he always says. *I* take a daily 325mg aspirin and have for years. MY hands are not bruised like that. He is obviously taking a prescription anticoagulant. My late husband took coumadin (for heart issues) and even though he was far younger than Trump, he also had those purplish discolorations on his arms and hands. Now Trump claims it was a CT, not an MRI, that he had, and of course it was "perfect." He didn't say what body part, but it's probably safe to say it was of his head, looking for signs of stroke. And he wasn't REALLY sleeping in all those photos of him sleeping during meetings.

He lies like the rest of us breathe.
 
Cypress said:
The turnip is an unhealthy, massively overweight old man who should be in an assisted care facility instead of the Oval office.
Click to expand...

You Stalinists are shitting your pants. A citizen journalist exposed your deep and massive fraud. Your dreams of regaining power are gone. So you start in with absurdity - all the facts about Joe Biden - but you try and lay them on Trump.

Yeah, you're that shitty.
 
Jarod said:
You did not notice him favoring one leg over the other? The Right leg was slow. If you say you cant see it, okay.

Its not a big deal, but its clearly there.
Click to expand...
Possible, but that doesn't show a "snails pace" or a "struggle"... Perhaps he rolled the ankle earlier? Maybe he has some inflammation. He isn't exactly super healthy, but then there have often been Presidents that weren't in perfect health.

What I didn't see was someone "struggling" to get down 4 steps.
 
Damocles said:
I wish... but we keep running octogenarians and idiots. It is my most sincere hope that we can get back to normalcy once this guy leaves office.
Click to expand...

What do you consider "Normalcy?" Neocon warmongers like Bush? Open pedophiles like Bill Clinton? Race hustlers like Obama?
 
Jarod said:
You did not notice him favoring one leg over the other? The Right leg was slow. If you say you cant see it, okay.

Its not a big deal, but its clearly there.
Click to expand...

You post lies in your Avie - you're a lying scumbag by definition.

Why would anyone take the idiocy you spew seriously. You're just a demagogue on the level of Heinrich Himmler.

1767371171374.png

I can put up fake pictures too.
 
Damocles said:
Possible, but that doesn't show a "snails pace" or a "struggle"... Perhaps he rolled the ankle earlier? Maybe he has some inflammation. He isn't exactly super healthy, but then there have often been Presidents that weren't in perfect health.

What I didn't see was someone "struggling" to get down 4 steps.
Click to expand...
Ok, it seems you see what I saw.
 
Damocles said:
I'd settle for less than constant efforts to fruitlessly impeach.
Click to expand...
The impeachment efforts were clearly impeachable, they provided actual impeachments. The Senate however failed to remove.

Three presidents have been impeached. One multiple times.


Was Clinton's impeachment, fruitless? Seems to me it's followed him, post presidency.
 
Jarod said:
The impeachment efforts were clearly impeachable, they provided actual impeachments. The Senate however failed to remove.

Three presidents have been impeached. One multiple times.
Click to expand...
They were clearly going nowhere and were certainly useless. They seemed to backfire on you as well, much like the attempt to use the courts against the candidacy you would do anything to end backfired. The guy was elected again even though you constantly attempt to impeach. I will bet you right now that if you win a majority in the house your party will once again fruitlessly impeach him, then you will likely lose the majority you gained in the next election...

Stop wasting our time and money on this fruitless attempt to "get him". That's my advice.
 
Jarod said:
The impeachment efforts were clearly impeachable, they provided actual impeachments. The Senate however failed to remove.

Three presidents have been impeached. One multiple times.


Was Clinton's impeachment, fruitless? Seems to me it's followed him, post presidency.
Click to expand...
If nothing else, his crimes are part of the Congressional record! That’s a good thing!
 
Damocles said:
They were clearly going nowhere and were certainly useless. They seemed to backfire on you as well, much like the attempt to use the courts against the candidacy you would do anything to end backfired. The guy was elected again even though you constantly attempt to impeach. I will bet you right now that if you win a majority in the house your party will once again fruitlessly impeach him, then you will likely lose the majority you gained in the next election...

Stop wasting our time and money on this fruitless attempt to "get him". That's my advice.
Click to expand...
I agree it backfired, but I still believe it was the right thing to do. A mark that such behavior from a president will not go by unnoticed by history.

If we are talking pure short term political advantage, you are correct, impeaching him was a bad move. If you are talking about how it will be looked upon in the future, for our Republic, it is important that he was actually impeached for crimes he committed.

I guess it depends on your goals and if they are short term or long term.

I do want the America I leave to my children to be less of a Putin style oligarchy rather than more of one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top