Trump could face court ordered restrictions

floridafan

Verified User
During an appearance on MSNBC on Friday morning, a former federal prosecutor claimed Donald Trump's ability to flit around the country and engage in campaign-related activities could be hampered if he is hit with one or more criminal indictments prior to the 2024 Republican primaries and general election.

Reacting to news that the former president has been invited to testify before a Manhattan grand jury next week – a move that could lead to a possible indictment over hush money paid to adult film star Stormy Daniels in 2016 – Glenn Kirschner said a judge could make the former president life's more difficult before going to trial.

Kirschner claimed an indictment looks likely, and Trump's ability to run for president could face court-ordered hurdles.

"Looking at the political ramifications through a legal lens, is there any law that would prevent Trump from being elected if he's indicted or convicted in a state or federal case, or is there any situation in which any kind of conviction would prevent him from campaigning, any kind of time or travel restrictions?" he was asked.

"You know, there is no legal prohibition, there is no constitutional prohibition, there is no case law, there's no precedent that says an aspiring, you know, a presidential candidate cannot run for office if under indictment," he replied

"The practicalities can be challenging," he elaborated. "I do think if he is indicted and then he is presented on that indictment, a judge could very well set conditions of release."

"I don't think anybody believes Donald Trump will be detained pending trial the way, you know, so many other folks charged with crimes are in this country, but the judge could restrict his travel," he explained. "The judge could put all kinds of conditions on his pretrial release that could hamper his ability to get out and campaign the way he would like.
 
I doubt he will be restricted in that case. But the other ones are a lot more severe. He should face the same consequences as any other criminal.
 
During an appearance on MSNBC on Friday morning, a former federal prosecutor claimed Donald Trump's ability to flit around the country and engage in campaign-related activities could be hampered if he is hit with one or more criminal indictments prior to the 2024 Republican primaries and general election.

Reacting to news that the former president has been invited to testify before a Manhattan grand jury next week – a move that could lead to a possible indictment over hush money paid to adult film star Stormy Daniels in 2016 – Glenn Kirschner said a judge could make the former president life's more difficult before going to trial.

Kirschner claimed an indictment looks likely, and Trump's ability to run for president could face court-ordered hurdles.

"Looking at the political ramifications through a legal lens, is there any law that would prevent Trump from being elected if he's indicted or convicted in a state or federal case, or is there any situation in which any kind of conviction would prevent him from campaigning, any kind of time or travel restrictions?" he was asked.

"You know, there is no legal prohibition, there is no constitutional prohibition, there is no case law, there's no precedent that says an aspiring, you know, a presidential candidate cannot run for office if under indictment," he replied

"The practicalities can be challenging," he elaborated. "I do think if he is indicted and then he is presented on that indictment, a judge could very well set conditions of release."

"I don't think anybody believes Donald Trump will be detained pending trial the way, you know, so many other folks charged with crimes are in this country, but the judge could restrict his travel," he explained. "The judge could put all kinds of conditions on his pretrial release that could hamper his ability to get out and campaign the way he would like.

Some observations. The word claim, claims or claimed appears 3 times in this post and the word "could" 8 times. And my favorite part:

""You know, there is no legal prohibition, there is no constitutional prohibition, there is no case law, there's no precedent that says an aspiring, you know, a presidential candidate cannot run for office if under indictment," he replied"
 
Some observations. The word claim, claims or claimed appears 3 times in this post and the word "could" 8 times. And my favorite part:

""You know, there is no legal prohibition, there is no constitutional prohibition, there is no case law, there's no precedent that says an aspiring, you know, a presidential candidate cannot run for office if under indictment," he replied"

Trump surely can run for office, it's just a matter of what restrictions a judge will place on him. You do seem to neglect the fact that this will be the first US President to ever be under criminal indictment.
 
Trump surely can run for office, it's just a matter of what restrictions a judge will place on him. You do seem to neglect the fact that this will be the first US President to ever be under criminal indictment.

You mean "could" place in him. That's inaccurate.
 
Back
Top