Trump doesn’t want America to see Mueller’s report anymore

Yep, no surprise....

he wants barr to make the call for him so he doesn't have to....... Then he can sluff it off as if it's barrs decision...

gee, I wonder if barr knows what the trumpfs preference:thinking: would be:thinking:

TRUMP_MUELLER_1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Naturally, he has Barr to blame for withholding the report that he ordered Barr not to release.

Barr can be his little paid scapegoat.
 
Trump selected Barr due to his paper backing the imperial presidency. Barr was asking for the job and indicating his right-wing loyalty. Trump did not have to ask him if he was loyal enough.
 
You liberals need to stop.... Whining !

Whining? Something else to add to the list of things you know nothing about? That is not whining. Trump said that he wanted it all released to the public. You do know that don't you? Now Trump is fighting it's release. To thinking people, that needs to be dealt with.
 
Last edited:
Whining? Something else to add to the list of things you know nothing about? That is not whining. Trump said that he wanted it all released to the public. You do know that don't you? Now Trump is fighting it's release. To thinking people, that needs to be dealt with.


Oh ya .... Alternet said so ! LOLOLOLOLOL !
 
As sure as the sun rises in the East and sets in the West, we all knew Donald Trump’s dalliance with transparency on Robert Mueller’s findings would come to a…

Now that Trump has learned those other 396 pages aren’t all dazzling pictures of him, he’s turning his ship around.


https://www.alternet.org/2019/04/a-...-want-america-to-see-muellers-report-anymore/

The problem is you have no evidence regarding a change of heart save for what your political handler Adam Schiff tells CNN.
 
Democrats predicting another Trump loss. Maybe someday they'll get one right, huh? This thread reeks of leftist jitters scared half to death that the whole Muller report WON'T crucify The Donald. Actually it's DOJ policy to NOT make public anything derogatory about any person not indicted. We'll see if Trump's, (alleged by the Democrats), puppet Barr follows DOJ policy, or gives the Democrats their smoking gun for impeachment. Nasty Nadler claims it's not the AG's authority to decide what's "obstruction of justice," he say's it's the Congresses authority therewith. He didn't mention what article in the Constitution proves his opinion.
 
Hello Robo,

Democrats predicting another Trump loss. Maybe someday they'll get one right, huh?

Got it right in '08 and '12.

Have those years been blocked from memory that quickly?

Look out for '20. Your side already motivated all the voters it can. The left sat it out in '16. They have strong motivation to vote next time, as shown in the '18 drubbing.

This thread reeks of leftist jitters scared half to death that the whole Muller report WON'T crucify The Donald.

How would we know that until it is released?

Actually it's DOJ policy to NOT make public anything derogatory about any person not indicted.

So, you figure the rules mean nothing derogatory can ever be released about the President because he can't be indicted, eh? How convenient. Good luck making that one stick in the House.

We'll see if Trump's, (alleged by the Democrats), puppet Barr follows DOJ policy, or gives the Democrats their smoking gun for impeachment. Nasty Nadler claims it's not the AG's authority to decide what's "obstruction of justice," he say's it's the Congresses authority therewith. He didn't mention what article in the Constitution proves his opinion.

"Oversight is an implied rather than an enumerated power under the U.S. Constitution.[2] The government's charter does not explicitly grant Congress the authority to conduct inquiries or investigations of the executive, to have access to records or materials held by the executive, or to issue subpoenas for documents or testimony from the executive.

There was little discussion of the power to oversee, review, or investigate executive activity at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 or later in The Federalist Papers, which argued in favor of ratification of the Constitution. The lack of debate was because oversight and its attendant authority were seen as an inherent power of representative assemblies which enacted public law.[3]

Oversight also derives from the many and varied express powers of the Congress in the Constitution. It is implied in the legislature's authority, among other powers and duties, to appropriate funds, enact laws, raise and support armies, provide for a Navy, declare war, and impeach and remove from office the President, Vice President, and other civil officers. Congress could not reasonably or responsibly exercise these powers without knowing what the executive was doing; how programs were being administered, by whom, and at what cost; and whether officials were obeying the law and complying with legislative intent. "

wiki
 
The Mueller report can say that the diseased orangutan was the original role model for Mother Teresa.
It doesn't matter.
Anybody with two functioning brain cells to work together knows that the president is a piece of shit unworthy to share the oxygen supply.
The problem is, there's no such thing as a Trumpanzee with two normally functioning brain cells.
 
Back
Top