Trump is trying to poison the jury pool of American people

floridafan

Verified User
CNN political analyst Molly Ball said Thursday that President Donald Trump is growing more worried about impeachment, and is trying to “poison the jury pool” by any means possible before House and Senate leaders try to get rid of him.

“Have we gone from ‘he didn’t do it’ to ‘it’s probably not illegal’ to ‘if you come after us, we’ll come after you?'” asked Poppy Harlow noting an implicit threat from Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani in an interview with the New York Times.

“And everybody does it, right? This is in a way typical Rudy bluster,” Ball laughed, saying Giuliani was trying “to move the goal post on what exactly constitutes acceptability.”

Ball said that the president has been “very straightforward about what he’s doing”.

“He is trying to poison the jury pool of the American people,” she said, adding that the effort had been effective to some extent. “He’s trying to make the Mueller investigation so unpopular with the public as a whole that they agree with the president, that it is a partisan witch hunt and therefore that anything that elected leaders in the House and Senate would do to pursue something like impeachment would be seen as illegitimate.
 
I think Trump lies so much just to get his disciples to become nose numb to lying. Notice how the Trumpsters dont even care if he lies...
 
I think Trump lies so much just to get his disciples to become nose numb to lying. Notice how the Trumpsters dont even care if he lies...

Thats just what he and most of the posters here are trying to accomplish. Its not gonna work. Not in the mid terms and not now.
 
But if Barack or Hillary Lies ... :eek:

They all lie...the sheep on the left care about the lies from the right, the sheep on the right care about the lies from the left.

partisan sheep are the same no matter which parties pen they reside in.
 
They all lie...the sheep on the left care about the lies from the right, the sheep on the right care about the lies from the left.

partisan sheep are the same no matter which parties pen they reside in.


Please ... you're not trying to compare Trump to anyone else ... as if there's an equal :laugh:
 
:laugh: Donny a Great Con Man

So was Obama.

Bush II was just in over his head, not up for the job.

Bill was slick and played both sides like a fiddle.

Bush I was just sort of there, was pretty much useless.

Reagan, the great and mighty was a liberal that never saw a spending bill that he did not love.
 
So was Obama.

How so?


Bush II was just in over his head, not up for the job.

Interesting attempt to re-brand and re-characterize poor Bush, making him look like a victim, that way you don't have to admit the Conservative policies he pushed that you supported were terrible.


Bill was slick and played both sides like a fiddle.

How so?

Notice how all these statements are pretty vague and allow maximum wiggle room to shift within the parameters?


Bush I was just sort of there, was pretty much useless.

How so?


Reagan, the great and mighty was a liberal that never saw a spending bill that he did not love.

"No True Scotsman".

See, it's generalized, superficial posts like this that you use to try and establish your own fake credibility so you can continue advancing the same policies and beliefs you were pushing prior to the election.

The results of the election forced you into self-reflection and unfortunately, you took the wrong lessons away from that.
 
So was Obama.

Bush II was just in over his head, not up for the job.

Bill was slick and played both sides like a fiddle.

Bush I was just sort of there, was pretty much useless.

Reagan, the great and mighty was a liberal that never saw a spending bill that he did not love.


But Only One (1) is and Unindicted Co-Conspirator, named Individual-1 ... Game/Set/Match :laugh:
 
How so?




Interesting attempt to re-brand and re-characterize poor Bush, making him look like a victim, that way you don't have to admit the Conservative policies he pushed that you supported were terrible.




How so?

Notice how all these statements are pretty vague and allow maximum wiggle room to shift within the parameters?




How so?




"No True Scotsman".

See, it's generalized, superficial posts like this that you use to try and establish your own fake credibility so you can continue advancing the same policies and beliefs you were pushing prior to the election.

The results of the election forced you into self-reflection and unfortunately, you took the wrong lessons away from that.

Are you going to be my stalker? Following me around from thread to thread hoping I will give you some attention?

I get one of those on every forum I am a part of.

you are like little puppy dogs humping my leg looking for attention.
 
Are you going to be my stalker? Following me around from thread to thread hoping I will give you some attention?

It's not your attention I'm after.

What I'm after is undermining your credibility and thus, your arguments by pointing out that you're a faker who is too much of a pussy to admit you got hosed by the election.

You created a new persona to start over in order to continue advancing your shitty Conservative ideas without having to eat shit for them.
 
I get one of those on every forum I am a part of.

Maybe that should tell you that your attempt to re-brand yourself doesn't work and no one buys it.

Also, it just harms your brand further because we associate all that baggage with you.

Do you think anyone buys this shtick?
 
[h=1]Cohen admits he lied means he is not credible ...

Trump won't admit he lies means he is credible ...

RW logic at work.[/h]


 
They all lie...the sheep on the left care about the lies from the right, the sheep on the right care about the lies from the left.

partisan sheep are the same no matter which parties pen they reside in.

And lying is equally wrong by either side.
 
Back
Top