Trump official writes scathing New York Times editorial denouncing their own boss

F

floridafan

Verified User
An anonymous Trump administration official has penned a scathing editorial in the New York Times denouncing his own boss.

In the editorial, the unnamed official describes themselves as a member of “The Resistance,” despite the fact that they are working inside Trump’s White House.
The official says that they — and many other members inside the Trump White House — see it as their job “to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.”

The official adds that they “would know” because “I am one of them.”

The official goes on to document the reasons that they have to stop Trump from behaving in ways that damage the United States.

“The root of the problem is the president’s amorality,” they write. “Anyone who works with him knows he is not moored to any discernible first principles that guide his decision making.”

The official says that they are proud of the work they’ve done within the White House to enact tax cuts, regulatory rollbacks and increased military spending — but they say that “these successes have come despite — not because of — the president’s leadership style, which is impetuous, adversarial, petty and ineffective.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/an...ing-new-york-times-editorial-denouncing-boss/
 
The point is soon after this admin started, the officials saw evidence of Trump diminished mental abilities. There is a cabal of people who are grouped and trying to mitigate all the damage that Trump is capable of doing. They see serious conflicts with our allies and his embracing dictators as a terrible problem. The writer is backing the Woodward book very well. The admin has discussed the 25 th amendment as a remedy.
 
floridafan said:
An anonymous Trump administration official has penned a scathing editorial in the New York Times denouncing his own boss.

In the editorial, the unnamed official describes themselves as a member of “The Resistance,” despite the fact that they are working inside Trump’s White House.
The official says that they — and many other members inside the Trump White House — see it as their job “to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.”

The official adds that they “would know” because “I am one of them.”

The official goes on to document the reasons that they have to stop Trump from behaving in ways that damage the United States.

“The root of the problem is the president’s amorality,” they write. “Anyone who works with him knows he is not moored to any discernible first principles that guide his decision making.”

The official says that they are proud of the work they’ve done within the White House to enact tax cuts, regulatory rollbacks and increased military spending — but they say that “these successes have come despite — not because of — the president’s leadership style, which is impetuous, adversarial, petty and ineffective.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/an...ing-new-york-times-editorial-denouncing-boss/
Click to expand...

Third thread with this moronic bullshit?

giphy.gif


l5zghwu5v3e11.jpg
 
Nordberg said:
The point is soon after this admin started, the officials saw evidence of Trump diminished mental abilities. There is a cabal of people who are grouped and trying to mitigate all the damage that Trump is capable of doing. They see serious conflicts with our allies and his embracing dictators as a terrible problem. The writer is backing the Woodward book very well. The admin has discussed the 25 th amendment as a remedy.
Click to expand...

I found your point:
giphy.gif
 
floridafan said:
An anonymous Trump administration official has penned a scathing editorial in the New York Times denouncing his own boss.

In the editorial, the unnamed official describes themselves as a member of “The Resistance,” despite the fact that they are working inside Trump’s White House.
The official says that they — and many other members inside the Trump White House — see it as their job “to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.”

The official adds that they “would know” because “I am one of them.”

The official goes on to document the reasons that they have to stop Trump from behaving in ways that damage the United States.

“The root of the problem is the president’s amorality,” they write. “Anyone who works with him knows he is not moored to any discernible first principles that guide his decision making.”

The official says that they are proud of the work they’ve done within the White House to enact tax cuts, regulatory rollbacks and increased military spending — but they say that “these successes have come despite — not because of — the president’s leadership style, which is impetuous, adversarial, petty and ineffective.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/an...ing-new-york-times-editorial-denouncing-boss/
Click to expand...

lol.....the dumbfucks think this guy is really a Trump official.....
 
Stargazer said:
More fiction for libtards to gobble up and make themselves feel good.
Click to expand...

One of our most esteemed reporters writes a book about the Trump admin, and the next day a member of his admin backs the book, and you call it fiction. That says a lot about you. That is against the evidence.
 
This all makes sense, corroborates what has been said many times, and explains why the President contradicts himself so regularly, why there is such a high turnover rate.
 
Nordberg said:
One of our most esteemed reporters writes a book about the Trump admin, and the next day a member of his admin backs the book, and you call it fiction. That says a lot about you. That is against the evidence.
Click to expand...

Name the member of his administration you ignorant fuck. Oh wait, you can't because it is FABRICATED bullshit.
 
Nordberg said:
The real idiots doubt it. The NYT says he identified himself and they would not print it if they did not and know he had inside information. PP, tyou suck up to Trump like a cheap hooker.
Click to expand...

An anonymous source said that Obama was born in Africa and a Muslim. You have to believe this. Moron.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top