"Trump says there should be no Mueller report"

A

archives

Verified User
"President Donald Trump said Friday that “there should be no” report from special counsel Robert Mueller on his Russia investigation."

"His comments come a day after the House unanimously passed a symbolic resolution calling for public release of the report Mueller gives to the Justice Department about his probe. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., tried to bring the measure up in his chamber on Thursday, but Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., blocked it."

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/15/tru...be-no-robert-mueller-russia-probe-report.html

Now would an individual who for two years straight has been telling anyone who will listen that he is totally innocent of anything today want to ban the very evidence that according to his logic will prove he is innocent?

Why would his house Senator Graham go out of his way to insure that the very vehicle proving Trump innocent be kept from public view?

Doesn't seem to make sense, unless ....
 
archives said:
"President Donald Trump said Friday that “there should be no” report from special counsel Robert Mueller on his Russia investigation."

"His comments come a day after the House unanimously passed a symbolic resolution calling for public release of the report Mueller gives to the Justice Department about his probe. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., tried to bring the measure up in his chamber on Thursday, but Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., blocked it."

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/15/tru...be-no-robert-mueller-russia-probe-report.html

Now would an individual who for two years straight has been telling anyone who will listen that he is totally innocent of anything today want to ban the very evidence that according to his logic will prove he is innocent?

Why would his house Senator Graham go out of his way to insure that the very vehicle proving Trump innocent be kept from public view?

Doesn't seem to make sense, unless ....
Click to expand...

story of your life....
We’re sorry, something went wrong.
Click to expand...

wonder what he really said.....
 
archives said:
"President Donald Trump said Friday that “there should be no” report from special counsel Robert Mueller on his Russia investigation."

"His comments come a day after the House unanimously passed a symbolic resolution calling for public release of the report Mueller gives to the Justice Department about his probe. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., tried to bring the measure up in his chamber on Thursday, but Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., blocked it."

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/15/tru...be-no-robert-mueller-russia-probe-report.html

Now would an individual who for two years straight has been telling anyone who will listen that he is totally innocent of anything today want to ban the very evidence that according to his logic will prove he is innocent?

Why would his house Senator Graham go out of his way to insure that the very vehicle proving Trump innocent be kept from public view?

Doesn't seem to make sense, unless ....
Click to expand...

You're such a clueless dumbfuck you can't even get the link right.

Page not found
Published 5:03 PM ET Thu, 2 Aug 2012 Updated 12:57 PM ET Fri, 8 July 2016 CNBC.com
We're sorry, the page you were looking for isn't found here.
 
In a series of tweets, Trump said the special counsel “should never have been appointed and there should be no Mueller Report.” He also claimed Mueller’s investigation was “an illegal & conflicted investigation in search of a crime.”
Click to expand...

at least these statements are correct.....
 
archives said:
"President Donald Trump said Friday that “there should be no” report from special counsel Robert Mueller on his Russia investigation."

"His comments come a day after the House unanimously passed a symbolic resolution calling for public release of the report Mueller gives to the Justice Department about his probe. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., tried to bring the measure up in his chamber on Thursday, but Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., blocked it."

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/15/tru...be-no-robert-mueller-russia-probe-report.html

Now would an individual who for two years straight has been telling anyone who will listen that he is totally innocent of anything today want to ban the very evidence that according to his logic will prove he is innocent?

Why would his house Senator Graham go out of his way to insure that the very vehicle proving Trump innocent be kept from public view?

Doesn't seem to make sense, unless ....
Click to expand...

What's he AFRAID of? NO COLLUSION. It will exonerate him, right?
 
archives said:
Now would an individual who for two years straight has been telling anyone who will listen that he is totally innocent of anything today want to ban the very evidence that according to his logic will prove he is innocent?
Click to expand...

For the same reason there is a fourth amendment. It's tyranny and oppression. The investigation is the punishment in a fishing expedition.
 
archives said:
"President Donald Trump said Friday that “there should be no” report from special counsel Robert Mueller on his Russia investigation."

"His comments come a day after the House unanimously passed a symbolic resolution calling for public release of the report Mueller gives to the Justice Department about his probe. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., tried to bring the measure up in his chamber on Thursday, but Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., blocked it."

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/15/tru...be-no-robert-mueller-russia-probe-report.html

Now would an individual who for two years straight has been telling anyone who will listen that he is totally innocent of anything today want to ban the very evidence that according to his logic will prove he is innocent?

Why would his house Senator Graham go out of his way to insure that the very vehicle proving Trump innocent be kept from public view?

Doesn't seem to make sense, unless ....
Click to expand...
in a series of tweets, Trump said the special counsel “should never have been appointed and there should be no Mueller Report.” He also claimed Mueller’s investigation was “an illegal & conflicted investigation in search of a crime.”
Click to expand...
don't do this to yourself -we already have too many posters who compose misleading titles - I thought you were better then that
 
Centerleftfl said:
What's he AFRAID of? NO COLLUSION. It will exonerate him, right?
Click to expand...
did he say he was "afraid?" no he said
n a series of tweets, Trump said the special counsel “should never have been appointed and there should be no Mueller Report.” He also claimed Mueller’s investigation was “an illegal & conflicted investigation in search of a crime.”
Click to expand...
and he is 100% correct - Mueller was a construct of the Deep State; an "insurance policy' if Trump won
 
Truth Detector said:
You're such a clueless dumbfuck you can't even get the link right.

Page not found
Published 5:03 PM ET Thu, 2 Aug 2012 Updated 12:57 PM ET Fri, 8 July 2016 CNBC.com
We're sorry, the page you were looking for isn't found here.
Click to expand...

Here, a second source, for they anal retentive, if you need more, there are plenty, but you should have known it, it was a Trump tweet today, you mean you aren't keeping up with your messiah?
 
archives said:
"President Donald Trump said Friday that “there should be no” report from special counsel Robert Mueller on his Russia investigation."

"His comments come a day after the House unanimously passed a symbolic resolution calling for public release of the report Mueller gives to the Justice Department about his probe. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., tried to bring the measure up in his chamber on Thursday, but Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., blocked it."

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/15/tru...be-no-robert-mueller-russia-probe-report.html

Now would an individual who for two years straight has been telling anyone who will listen that he is totally innocent of anything today want to ban the very evidence that according to his logic will prove he is innocent?

Why would his house Senator Graham go out of his way to insure that the very vehicle proving Trump innocent be kept from public view?

Doesn't seem to make sense, unless ....
Click to expand...

A report on a "nothing burger" ends up with NOTHING in it. Are you vapor locking because there is no evidence that produced any prosecution other than the criminals that should've been prosecuted decades ago? Funnier than hell. SYMBOLIC.....laugh my freaking ass off....an admission the left is doing nothing on the tax payer dime but "BLOVIATING". :rolleyes:


BLOVIATE: Orate (talk) verbosely (using to many words in order to appear important) and WINDILY
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top