Trump's trashing of the Iran nuclear deal is really about one word: Obama

“The fact is, this was a horrible, one-sided deal that should have never, ever been made,” he said. “It didn’t bring calm, it didn’t bring peace, and it never will.”

His target was not an Iranian Ayatollah, president or general. It was an American president, his own predecessor Barack Obama.

Ripping up this deal means Mr Trump has another notch on his door post as he goes about unravelling Mr Obama’s legacy. Alongside the Paris accords, the Trans-Pacific Trade Deal and Obamacare’s individual mandate, he can now add the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as the Iran nuclear deal is formally known.

In so doing, he paid scant regard to the facts. Like it or not, Iran remains in compliance with the deal. (The US, when/if it reimposes sanctions, will actually be the signatory to break its terms).

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...hing-iran-nuclear-deal-really-one-word-obama/
 
“The fact is, this was a horrible, one-sided deal that should have never, ever been made,” he said. “It didn’t bring calm, it didn’t bring peace, and it never will.”

His target was not an Iranian Ayatollah, president or general. It was an American president, his own predecessor Barack Obama.

Ripping up this deal means Mr Trump has another notch on his door post as he goes about unravelling Mr Obama’s legacy. Alongside the Paris accords, the Trans-Pacific Trade Deal and Obamacare’s individual mandate, he can now add the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as the Iran nuclear deal is formally known.

In so doing, he paid scant regard to the facts. Like it or not, Iran remains in compliance with the deal. (The US, when/if it reimposes sanctions, will actually be the signatory to break its terms).

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...hing-iran-nuclear-deal-really-one-word-obama/

maybe that one word is actually RACISM
 
If only Obama had gotten congressional approval of the deal, Trump couldn't have done this......of course, he would have had to deal with Schumer, who opposed it......
 
its about containing Iran. It doesnt make sense to blockade Qatar on one hand then to give Iran an escape hatch on the other. We have a consistent ME strategy.
 
https://classroom.synonym.com/civil-warera-political-parties-north-vs-south-8901.html


so tell us why the republican party lost all its black America support and now is the favorite party of racists?







Home » Classroom






Civil War-Era Political Parties of the North Vs. the South
By Dell Markey

The Confederacy held one presidential election, electing Jefferson Davis to a six year term.

The years leading up to the American Civil War were some of the most divisive in American history. Many northerners favored the abolition of slavery. Others supported accommodating the southern states. Most southerners favored maintaining the institution of slavery and favored the power of state governments over that of the federal government. These disagreements split existing political parties and led to the formation of new parties that vied for control of the U.S. and Confederate governments during the Civil War.


Democratic Party
The Democratic Party was formed by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in 1792 and held considerable power in the years leading up to the Civil War. The Democratic Party became divided in the 1850s over the issue of slavery, with some factions in the north supporting abolitionist causes, some northern factions supporting accommodation of the South and Southern Democrats supporting the continuation and expansion of slavery. During the elections of 1860, Southern and Northern Democrats nominated separate candidates for president. After the Civil War broke out, former Southern Democrats held considerable clout in the Confederate Congress. Northern Democrats lost much of their political power in the North during the Civil War.
Republican Party
The Republican Party was founded in the 1850s by northerners who wanted to abolish slavery. The demise of the Whig Party and the split in the Democratic Party in the years leading up to the 1860 elections gave the Republicans an opportunity to advance. Republican candidate Abraham Lincoln won the U.S. Presidential election in 1860 and Republicans gained control of Congress, leading to the secession of eleven Southern states. The Republican Party had very little support in the South before the war and virtually none after war broke out. In 1864, the Republican Party joined with Democrats who favored the war effort to form the National Union Party. Other Republicans, who were in favor of pressing the war more forcefully, left the Republican Party to form the Radical Democracy Party. The National Union Party won the 1864 presidential election.
Constitutional Union Party
The Constitutional Union Party was formed by former Whigs, former Know-Nothings (American Party) and moderate Democrats. The Constitutional Union Party's platform called for preserving the union by refusing to take sides on divisive issues such as slavery. Sam Houston, a leading figure in the War for Texas Independence, was a prominent member of the Constitutional Union Party and was considered for the presidential nomination in 1860. The party nominated Tennessee slave owner John Bell. When it became obvious that support for the party was weak, many in the Constitutional Union Party attempted to join with Northern Democrats who supported appeasement.
Political Parties in the Confederacy
There were no recognized political parties in the Confederate States of America. Most Southerners, including Confederate President Jefferson Davis, opposed political parties, considering them to be a corruption of the principles of republican government. However, many of the members of the Confederate Congress were former Southern Democrats. A few had been Constitutional Unionists or Whigs. While there were no political parties, per se, Confederate politicians often divided over the issue of whether to have a strong central government. Nationalists, including Jefferson Davis, favored giving the Confederate government broad powers, especially in war time. Libertarians, led by Alexander Stephens, favored a very limited confederate government, reserving most powers -- including most war powers -- to the individual states.
 
If only Obama had gotten congressional approval of the deal, Trump couldn't have done this......of course, he would have had to deal with Schumer, who opposed it......


I know you're just a stupid ignorant trumpster but really this isn't a serious post is it. Congress voted on the deal.
 
I know.. Iran has been such a problem trying to establish a foothold on the Arabian peninsula for so long.. The problem here is that so far Iran is in compliance with the nuclear agreement and now they are free to ramp up developing nuclear weapons.

The other members of the agreement don't count? I thought this was a international agreement, guess I was wrong.

I think it is a mistake to pull out now. But then I don't know all the details pro and con.
 
The other members of the agreement don't count? I thought this was a international agreement, guess I was wrong.


Absolutely the other parties to the agreement count they're going to continue selling stuff to Iran in spite of Trumps pitiful sanctions
 
Back
Top