UFO congressional hearings

[Cypress]

New UFO hearings continue an “endless loop” of sensation​

Astronomer Adam Frank asks: With so many extraordinary claims, why can’t anybody produce the proof?

Two subcommittees of the House Oversight Committee recently held a joint hearing titled “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth.” As with previous congressional hearings on UAPs, there were many extraordinary claims but essentially no extraordinary evidence.

A few points about these extraordinary claims are worth noting. Sean Kirkpatrick was the recent director of the Department of Defense’s All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). This is one organization that’s been handling UAP studies. Kirkpatrick has talked about what he sees as a long-running circular conversation among UFO enthusiasts in the government. People who claim to know about something talk to other interested people. Those people then talk to others about that first person and their claims. This goes on and on until a kind of murky mythology builds up where no one has actual proof of anything, but everyone says they know someone who does.

New UFO hearings continue an "endless loop" of sensation

Astronomer Adam Frank asks: With so many extraordinary claims, why has nobody been able to produce the proof?

bigthink.com

 

[Yakuda]

New UFO hearings continue an “endless loop” of sensation​

Astronomer Adam Frank asks: With so many extraordinary claims, why can’t anybody produce the proof?

Two subcommittees of the House Oversight Committee recently held a joint hearing titled “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth.” As with previous congressional hearings on UAPs, there were many extraordinary claims but essentially no extraordinary evidence.

A few points about these extraordinary claims are worth noting. Sean Kirkpatrick was the recent director of the Department of Defense’s All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). This is one organization that’s been handling UAP studies. Kirkpatrick has talked about what he sees as a long-running circular conversation among UFO enthusiasts in the government. People who claim to know about something talk to other interested people. Those people then talk to others about that first person and their claims. This goes on and on until a kind of murky mythology builds up where no one has actual proof of anything, but everyone says they know someone who does.

New UFO hearings continue an "endless loop" of sensation

Astronomer Adam Frank asks: With so many extraordinary claims, why has nobody been able to produce the proof?

bigthink.com

I want to know why the sudden name change.

 

[Cypress]

I want to know why the sudden name change.

The two theories I have are:

UFO is a term now associated with kooks and fringe theorists.

How do we know they actually "flying" and aerodynamically designed to do so, rather than some unidentified atmospheric or optical phenomena?

 

[Daylight63]

I want to know why the sudden name change.

Probably to cover up the TRUTH. That's always why they change names of things. They are hiding the aliens among us!

Thank GOD we have SPACE FORCE now to DEPORT 'EM ALL BACK TO URANUS.

 

[Cypress]

Five billion smart phones on the planet and the best we have are some grainy videos and indistinct photos.

 

[Taichiliberal]

IMHO, it's all an official con job - let's call it UAP to subconsciously lend to the notion of something NOT of physical construct but of natural (ecological) formation.

And this joker running around doing his "I was AATIP leader," seems to consistently lean towards "secret gov't proto-types" as the culprits, whether by USA or other gov't design.

Ahh, I love to watch the BS about the "black triangles" that were seen and tracked by the Belgian air force, or witnessed by multitudes in Phoenix, AZ or over the Hudson river in NY.