Vote for Republicans

Cancel7

Banned
They're competent!

Weapons Given to Iraq Are Missing
GAO Estimates 30% of Arms Are Unaccounted For

By Glenn Kessler
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, August 6, 2007; A01



The Pentagon has lost track of about 190,000 AK-47 assault rifles and pistols given to Iraqi security forces in 2004 and 2005, according to a new government report, raising fears that some of those weapons have fallen into the hands of insurgents fighting U.S. forces in Iraq.

The author of the report from the Government Accountability Office says U.S. military officials do not know what happened to 30 percent of the weapons the United States distributed to Iraqi forces from 2004 through early this year as part of an effort to train and equip the troops. The highest previous estimate of unaccounted-for weapons was 14,000, in a report issued last year by the inspector general for Iraq reconstruction.

The United States has spent $19.2 billion trying to develop Iraqi security forces since 2003, the GAO said, including at least $2.8 billion to buy and deliver equipment. But the GAO said weapons distribution was haphazard and rushed and failed to follow established procedures, particularly from 2004 to 2005, when security training was led by Gen. David H. Petraeus, who now commands all U.S. forces in Iraq.

The Pentagon did not dispute the GAO findings, saying it has launched its own investigation and indicating it is working to improve tracking. Although controls have been tightened since 2005, the inability of the United States to track weapons with tools such as serial numbers makes it nearly impossible for the U.S. military to know whether it is battling an enemy equipped by American taxpayers.

"They really have no idea where they are," said Rachel Stohl, a senior analyst at the Center for Defense Information who has studied small-arms trade and received Pentagon briefings on the issue. "It likely means that the United States is unintentionally providing weapons to bad actors."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/05/AR2007080501299_pf.html
 
30%!

That's unreal. I think they're screwing things like this up intentionally to preserve the talking point that "invasion was the right decision, but we just botched the execution...."
 
30%!

That's unreal. I think they're screwing things like this up intentionally to preserve the talking point that "invasion was the right decision, but we just botched the execution...."

LOL.

It's hard to imagine incompetence at this level. It does seem like it has to be purposeful.
 
30%!

That's unreal. I think they're screwing things like this up intentionally to preserve the talking point that "invasion was the right decision, but we just botched the execution...."


I can't believe bush fans were willing to spend a trillion dollars on iraq, on the remote chance that the secular dictator saddam might someday give nukes to an avowed enemy of his - islamic extremists.

But, they don't want to spend a dime to take mitigating measures to address the high scientific probability that climate change will have adverse global effects on us.
 
Back
Top