Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
There is something missing in the brain of a liberal. Possibly some chemical imbalance or mutated gene, but definitely some handicap which makes them unable to comprehend war or its consequences. Being this is the case, they are wholly incompetent in dealing with war on any level. In fact, war itself, goes against many of the very principles of liberalism. It is the antithesis of the liberals Holy Trinity... Peace, Love, and Dope!
When we look through history, the greatest liberals are not ever the greatest generals. Liberals generally don't achieve the rank of general, if they ever try, they are killed long before, because they don't comprehend war...duh. The decisions which have to be made in strategy, the strength and courage needed to send men to their death in battle, is just not something a liberal can ever get their minds around.
So it goes without saying, a Liberal Commander in Chief is never a good idea at a time of war. We can look back in American history for some prime examples of Liberal presidents botching wars, or getting us into wars we didn't need, or making the situation worse by not knowing what strategy is best, because of their mental handicap. Time and time again, we somehow manage to get into a war and then end up with a liberal president, it seems like we would have learned by now. They are not able to comprehend war, it is a mental thing with the brain! Let's just all be honest at admit this... it's like people who are born homosexuals... liberals just don't understand war.
And now, to prove my argument, we will see the parade of liberals come here to lambaste Bush and blame the war on him some more, and throw some more mud while ignoring the point of the thread. This is now considered the liberal's preferred method of response to anything pertaining to Iraq, Afghanistan, War on Terror, Radical Islam... No need in having to be embarrassed by their handicap of not comprehending war, they can deflect all criticisms by intensely focusing anger toward Bush. For years, I thought that it was strange how liberals seemed to hate Bush so much, then I figured it out, it's not personal at all... the rage is not about Bush, he could have been anyone... it's how they camouflage their mental handicap of not being able to deal with war or its consequences.
We've also seen how libs want to jump to defend radical extremists who are at war with us. They don't comprehend the war part, but they can relate to radicals, it's what they are all about. They feel this common bond with our enemies, they can see their point. Again, this stems from the lack of whatever in the brain, and is not their fault really. To the Liberal, war is not ever a necessary evil, it is always an evil that is unnecessary. It all coincides with what we have come to know as "Liberal Utopia" ...where everyone gets along and is at peace and harmony with each other... there is no more war, only love and peace... we all plant daisies and raise rainbow bunnies.
To the modern political Liberal, war has become somewhat of a novelty item. They can use it to appropriate our tax money for all kinds of things, so they like having it to justify their spending binges...lots of places to hide pork in defense contracts... and there is the public perception aspects... when the polls say staying in the war is popular, they can support it with a clear conscious, but they just don't deal with it. I was often puzzled at why liberals weren't more angry with Obama for not immediately withdrawing from Iraq, like they just knew he would... then I realized, they don't really care about the war in Iraq, as long as they can gain things politically from it. Right now, pushing through socialized health care and bailing out their contributors are more important than bringing home the troops. There is also the risk of losing votes if a withdrawal of forces caused something really bad to happen over there. So the war serves a purpose for liberals at this time, and they can justify their hypocrisy.
When we look through history, the greatest liberals are not ever the greatest generals. Liberals generally don't achieve the rank of general, if they ever try, they are killed long before, because they don't comprehend war...duh. The decisions which have to be made in strategy, the strength and courage needed to send men to their death in battle, is just not something a liberal can ever get their minds around.
So it goes without saying, a Liberal Commander in Chief is never a good idea at a time of war. We can look back in American history for some prime examples of Liberal presidents botching wars, or getting us into wars we didn't need, or making the situation worse by not knowing what strategy is best, because of their mental handicap. Time and time again, we somehow manage to get into a war and then end up with a liberal president, it seems like we would have learned by now. They are not able to comprehend war, it is a mental thing with the brain! Let's just all be honest at admit this... it's like people who are born homosexuals... liberals just don't understand war.
And now, to prove my argument, we will see the parade of liberals come here to lambaste Bush and blame the war on him some more, and throw some more mud while ignoring the point of the thread. This is now considered the liberal's preferred method of response to anything pertaining to Iraq, Afghanistan, War on Terror, Radical Islam... No need in having to be embarrassed by their handicap of not comprehending war, they can deflect all criticisms by intensely focusing anger toward Bush. For years, I thought that it was strange how liberals seemed to hate Bush so much, then I figured it out, it's not personal at all... the rage is not about Bush, he could have been anyone... it's how they camouflage their mental handicap of not being able to deal with war or its consequences.
We've also seen how libs want to jump to defend radical extremists who are at war with us. They don't comprehend the war part, but they can relate to radicals, it's what they are all about. They feel this common bond with our enemies, they can see their point. Again, this stems from the lack of whatever in the brain, and is not their fault really. To the Liberal, war is not ever a necessary evil, it is always an evil that is unnecessary. It all coincides with what we have come to know as "Liberal Utopia" ...where everyone gets along and is at peace and harmony with each other... there is no more war, only love and peace... we all plant daisies and raise rainbow bunnies.
To the modern political Liberal, war has become somewhat of a novelty item. They can use it to appropriate our tax money for all kinds of things, so they like having it to justify their spending binges...lots of places to hide pork in defense contracts... and there is the public perception aspects... when the polls say staying in the war is popular, they can support it with a clear conscious, but they just don't deal with it. I was often puzzled at why liberals weren't more angry with Obama for not immediately withdrawing from Iraq, like they just knew he would... then I realized, they don't really care about the war in Iraq, as long as they can gain things politically from it. Right now, pushing through socialized health care and bailing out their contributors are more important than bringing home the troops. There is also the risk of losing votes if a withdrawal of forces caused something really bad to happen over there. So the war serves a purpose for liberals at this time, and they can justify their hypocrisy.
