War and the Hart!

LMAO... I explained myself numerous times and you simply refused to acknowledge it. You continued playing semantics.

It is also humorous, for if I had continued trying to explain to you, eventually you would have tossed out the 'SF always has to have last word' line of crap you enjoy.

Au contraire. You didn't address my repeated inquiries as to why you kept saying that I either called you a racist, or implied such. You didn't say anything about that; you kept harping on my lack of explanation for your Obama hate, which I in fact explained no fewer than a dozen times, and fell back on your "lmao," "moron," "that is quite humorous," and "please do tell us"'s.
 
Notice I asked him in the form of a question? By me asking a question it is inferring that I do not know the answer. Now if I had ended my sentence with a period I would have been stating this is what he said. I didn't do that though did I? I asked him if this is what he meant.

One might think a lawyer would pick up on that but one often hears the phrase about not making assumptions...

It was clearly not what he meant, or thats what he would have said. You asked the question to try to set up a strawman. I called you out on it, and now you are pretending it was a serious question. If you honestly asked that as a serious question, you are dumb. I know you not to be dumb.
 
Au contraire. You didn't address my repeated inquiries as to why you kept saying that I either called you a racist, or implied such. You didn't say anything about that; you kept harping on my lack of explanation for your Obama hate, which I in fact explained no fewer than a dozen times, and fell back on your "lmao," "moron," "that is quite humorous," and "please do tell us"'s.

Yes, you did indeed continually duck answering with any specifics of my 'hate' and 'venom' for Obama... you just asked that we take your word for it that it was there. You ran like the little coward I said you were. I answered directly your post on hate and racism. Then you created a straw man suggesting I said ALL hate = racism, which I did not. You then kept harping on that straw man for it was so easy for you to beat upon.
 
It was clearly not what he meant, or thats what he would have said. You asked the question to try to set up a strawman. I called you out on it, and now you are pretending it was a serious question. If you honestly asked that as a serious question, you are dumb. I know you not to be dumb.

Dude, I know what he was trying to do. He was trying to be pre-emptive and call out people before anyone mentioned your misspelling. He used the term pro-war to stand for anyone with right-leaning political beliefs. But not everyone with right leaning political beliefs is pro-war. Hence I made my comment. Now you're trying to make something bigger out of it than it is.
 
Yes, you did indeed continually duck answering with any specifics of my 'hate' and 'venom' for Obama... you just asked that we take your word for it that it was there. You ran like the little coward I said you were. I answered directly your post on hate and racism. Then you created a straw man suggesting I said ALL hate = racism, which I did not. You then kept harping on that straw man for it was so easy for you to beat upon.

You're becoming the most dishonest poster on here.

I didn't ask you to take my word for it. I presented evidence of what I see as a consistent pattern out of you, and explained my reasoning on that in great detail. Not surprsingly, you dismissed that time & again, and kept lying about what I presented.

And yes - I kept saying that you were stating that all hate = racism. Because there is NO other explanation for why you have continued to say that I called you a racist, or implied such. I have never called you a racist, or implied that. The ONLY way anyone could reach that conclusion would be if they believed that all hate = racism.

Unless you want to try to explain that? This is what you keep sprinting from. Because you know you're wrong - I have never called you a racist, or implied it. Never.
 
Dude, I know what he was trying to do. He was trying to be pre-emptive and call out people before anyone mentioned your misspelling. He used the term pro-war to stand for anyone with right-leaning political beliefs. But not everyone with right leaning political beliefs is pro-war. Hence I made my comment. Now you're trying to make something bigger out of it than it is.

That is because Jarod is an idiot... you know, that spot on the ladder of intelligence just above a USC grad.
 
You're becoming the most dishonest poster on here.

I didn't ask you to take my word for it. I presented evidence of what I see as a consistent pattern out of you, and explained my reasoning on that in great detail. Not surprsingly, you dismissed that time & again, and kept lying about what I presented.

And yes - I kept saying that you were stating that all hate = racism. Because there is NO other explanation for why you have continued to say that I called you a racist, or implied such. I have never called you a racist, or implied that. The ONLY way anyone could reach that conclusion would be if they believed that all hate = racism.

Unless you want to try to explain that? This is what you keep sprinting from. Because you know you're wrong - I have never called you a racist, or implied it. Never.

Which I already explained, yet you completely ignored and now pretend never happened. You are the only one sprinting away like a coward. Still can't post one specific quote of my 'venom'???

didn't think so.... keep running away coward.
 
That is because Jarod is an idiot... you know, that spot on the ladder of intelligence just above a USC grad.


26804739.jpg



usc_sevengirls.jpg
 
Which I already explained, yet you completely ignored and now pretend never happened. You are the only one sprinting away like a coward. Still can't post one specific quote of my 'venom'???

didn't think so.... keep running away coward.

It was actually never explained. Never.

It's not enough to keep asserting that you did explain it, when you didn't. There is no explanation for why you have repeatedly stated that I called you a racist or implied such, when I never did so. None.
 
It was actually never explained. Never.

It's not enough to keep asserting that you did explain it, when you didn't. There is no explanation for why you have repeatedly stated that I called you a racist or implied such, when I never did so. None.

yes, it was, several times. But do keep running away coward. Not once did you explain yourself with a direct quote from me. Not once. Coward.
 
yes, it was, several times. But do keep running away coward. Not once did you explain yourself with a direct quote from me. Not once. Coward.

You use that word a lot, for someone who is running. Let's work backwards, and see who the real coward is.

You definitely said to BAC several times that I either called you a racist, or implied as much. Do you deny this?

Try to stick w/ a yes or no on that. It's an extremely simple question.
 
Back
Top