What? All I did was simple math. You are projecting stupid onto this and attacking me personally. I don't think you are stupid, just your opinion on this matter is so riddled with idiocy that you've "heard". So much so that you can't even look at math as something that can "prove" something that you don't want to believe.
When did I attack you personaly, oh you must mean right after you called me an idiot.
What makes you think I didn't look at your math?
Your theorectical math has no relation to any future tax overhauls, and I guarantee even if it were passed today rates for the richest would lower.
There is plenty of actual math to prove what I am saying but I have to eat dinner now.
Another moron who can't spell.
Surprising. Affirmative.
What? All I did was simple math. You are projecting stupid onto this and attacking me personally. I don't think you are stupid, just your opinion on this matter is so riddled with idiocy that you've "heard". So much so that you can't even look at math as something that can "prove" something that you don't want to believe.
For this example we'll set the tax rate at 20%...
But for the 2010 tax year the average rate for the top 1% was about 24%, which was higher than the average rate for other groups.
Unless the flat tax is more than 24%, the rich pay less than they do now. Where does the money come from? The middle and lower class.