Wetback Republican Reaction

Beefy

Worst gambler ever
We all know what Young said:

"My father had a ranch; we used to have 50-60 wetbacks to pick tomatoes, it takes two people to pick the same tomatoes now. It's all done by machine."

The old fart is just another out of touch throwback Republican moron that hasn't learned that this isn't the 50's anymore. No surprise there.

This reaction I find interesting though:

Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, the number two Republican in the upper chamber, was also quick to seek distance from the comment. He blasted Young in a statement, saying migrant workers come to the country for work and opportunities, not to "hear ethnic slurs and derogatory language from elected officials."

"The comments used by Rep. Young do nothing to elevate our party, political discourse or the millions who come here looking for economic opportunity," he continued.


In that order. Party first, political discourse second, people third.

Party first.

Right or wrong?
 
We all know what Young said:

"My father had a ranch; we used to have 50-60 wetbacks to pick tomatoes, it takes two people to pick the same tomatoes now. It's all done by machine."

The old fart is just another out of touch throwback Republican moron that hasn't learned that this isn't the 50's anymore. No surprise there.

This reaction I find interesting though:

Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, the number two Republican in the upper chamber, was also quick to seek distance from the comment. He blasted Young in a statement, saying migrant workers come to the country for work and opportunities, not to "hear ethnic slurs and derogatory language from elected officials."

"The comments used by Rep. Young do nothing to elevate our party, political discourse or the millions who come here looking for economic opportunity," he continued.


In that order. Party first, political discourse second, people third.

Party first.

Right or wrong?

The way the sentence is constructed, putting the people last would be the best, both for ease of listening/reading and also to illustrate that the final trait is the most important (you don't typically use the strongest or best argument first).
 
Also, it says he continued with the last sentence after making the comments in the previous paragraph. It's a pretty strong rebuke and he did not respond like a stormfronter with some unverifiable quote from LBJ. I can't see any reason to crticize Cornyn's response.
 
Ease of listening/reading? I think you went to school in reverse. This wasn't a Jerry Lee Lewis show, this was a sentence. Putting the people last isn't exactly lighting the piano on fire.

The Republicans used to be responsible, they used to care about fiscal shit - the shit that makes up most of the political discourse - but then they became drunk whores spending like Clinton in a porno shop, and now they want to base their strength on moral issues, and this clown decides to step in and talk wetback. Then the establishment comes in and says the party is hurt.....then discourse, then people.

Clowns. As if it wasn't bad enough.
 
We always seem unable to realize that legislators are like the easiest job to replace. Thousands of qualified professionals running around doing real jobs. Why can't the parties just implement a policy where they try to force out fuck-ups like Young?
 
Because qualified professionals are used to accountability, unlike those that work for the government. Professionals have to answer to people whether bosses or shareholders, politicians answer to voters who are generally, ahem, stupid, and have no direct dog in the fight. This comment shoudn't piss someone off because of a party, but because it shows this old fool is no longer operative in our society. Invariably though he is a Republitard, so maybe it is warranted...
 
Yes, the people are pretty fucking stupid. It's part of the reason why we got stuck with Byrd and Thurmond for all those eons. "Oh, no, who else could possibly learn their way around the Senate and bring home the bacon?!!? Arrggh, migraine setting in!"

:bang:
 
Because qualified professionals are used to accountability, unlike those that work for the government. Professionals have to answer to people whether bosses or shareholders, politicians answer to voters who are generally, ahem, stupid, and have no direct dog in the fight. This comment shoudn't piss someone off because of a party, but because it shows this old fool is no longer operative in our society. Invariably though he is a Republitard, so maybe it is warranted...

There're also donors that politicians have to answer to. :rolleyes:
 
If I got elected to office, I would make it a point to ignore my donors just to see how much it hurts me when I go up for re-election.

Is Pikachu a communist?
 
If I got elected to office, I would make it a point to ignore my donors just to see how much it hurts me when I go up for re-election.

Is Pikachu a communist?

soviet_pikachu_by_proudryukin13-d3c19t9.jpg
 
We all know what Young said:

"My father had a ranch; we used to have 50-60 wetbacks to pick tomatoes, it takes two people to pick the same tomatoes now. It's all done by machine."

The old fart is just another out of touch throwback Republican moron that hasn't learned that this isn't the 50's anymore. No surprise there.

This reaction I find interesting though:

Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, the number two Republican in the upper chamber, was also quick to seek distance from the comment. He blasted Young in a statement, saying migrant workers come to the country for work and opportunities, not to "hear ethnic slurs and derogatory language from elected officials."

"The comments used by Rep. Young do nothing to elevate our party, political discourse or the millions who come here looking for economic opportunity," he continued.


In that order. Party first, political discourse second, people third.

Party first.

Right or wrong?

well cornyn is correct, repugs must not say what they think, just what the party line is...of course the 'new' party line(s) are mostly lies designed to bring more minorities into the party...their main problem is how many will believe their lies and will they lose their 'base'
 
We all know what Young said:

"My father had a ranch; we used to have 50-60 wetbacks to pick tomatoes, it takes two people to pick the same tomatoes now. It's all done by machine."

The old fart is just another out of touch throwback Republican moron that hasn't learned that this isn't the 50's anymore. No surprise there.

This reaction I find interesting though:

Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, the number two Republican in the upper chamber, was also quick to seek distance from the comment. He blasted Young in a statement, saying migrant workers come to the country for work and opportunities, not to "hear ethnic slurs and derogatory language from elected officials."

"The comments used by Rep. Young do nothing to elevate our party, political discourse or the millions who come here looking for economic opportunity," he continued.


In that order. Party first, political discourse second, people third.

Party first.

Right or wrong?

yes, when they run out of lies and distortions
 
Imagine if there had been this much outrage over Byrd using the word nigger and belonging to the KKK.

Guess there is no need for the GOP to support immigration reform now
 
If I got elected to office, I would make it a point to ignore my donors just to see how much it hurts me when I go up for re-election.

Is Pikachu a communist?
Considering that money is the mothers milk of politics you'd find out real fast how bad it would hurt you.
 
He’s Mexican

3845311_20120207131747_3_LARGE.jpg


I’m over here now. That’s my twin sister. Her husband is a retired captain from the PD.

image160831.jpg


Bruce jeTTer at his best.


The survey noted that the Israeli government regulates the price of gasoline,
and that taxes typically make up about half the cost of a gallon of gas. It also
noted that while Israel taxes gasoline, it simultaneously subsidizes oil to the
tune of some $565 million per year.

3.11 Israeli New Shekel

Israel Diesel prices — Litre ————-- Gallon
ILS ————————— 6.261 ————- 23.700
USD ————————- 2.011 ————- 7.612
EUR ————————- 1.775 ————- 6.719

What do you do all day?
I hit people over there fukcen head.
I’m in the union. That’s my father.
This is backdrafts - These guys are the new juniors.

All hail to the salute. Hockey Rules! My badge my gun.

Mr. Sciacca, 28, was a member of the Giannini crew, a group of Queens-based wiseguys who worked on a freelance basis for three of the city's five Mafia families over the last 10 years, the government says. He admitted in court on Monday to taking part in three kidnappings, two attempted murders, one murder conspiracy and two actual murders, in which he disposed of the evidence by setting the corpses on fire.

Each time he was asked by Judge Roanne L. Mann to explain precisely what he did, Mr. Sciacca described his violent acts as if they were trips to the post office or the dry cleaners.

''I poured gasoline in the car on the bodies and lit the match,'' he said of the 1992 killings of John Ruisi and Steven Pagnozzi.

Mafia Minor-Leaguers

The government says the Giannini crew was a sort of farm team for La Cosa Nostra. The group of would-be Mafiosi hung out at the Caffe Giannini on Fresh Pond Road in Ridgewood, Queens.

They began their criminal careers as a punch-happy street gang called the Ridgewood Boys or the Ridgewood Juniors, the authorities say. By the early 1990's, they had hooked up with an older set of men called the Ridgewood Seniors, which the government says hooked up with some local men involved in a more sophisticated level of organized crime.
 
I mopped 40 landings in a 8 hour shift. Every 3 or 4 landings
you have to change the water. The rails have to be wiped down.
Lightning strike me down. I did better without the helper.


Empire_State_Building_%28aerial_view%29.jpg


I’m a engineer. Every other day I hung out at NY Dolls. It’s across the street.

e13c006753d71db7528ba30c3c8d7da1.jpg


How did you find the place?
 
I had a bag of ice melt in front rod the house. Somebody stole it.
I have a small piece of property out front. The house in the island
where the kids are is a 100 x 100 lot. You need a blower.



Trabajo Animales

SEIU_32BJ_logo.jpg
 
We all know what Young said:

"My father had a ranch; we used to have 50-60 wetbacks to pick tomatoes, it takes two people to pick the same tomatoes now. It's all done by machine."

The old fart is just another out of touch throwback Republican moron that hasn't learned that this isn't the 50's anymore. No surprise there.

This reaction I find interesting though:

Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, the number two Republican in the upper chamber, was also quick to seek distance from the comment. He blasted Young in a statement, saying migrant workers come to the country for work and opportunities, not to "hear ethnic slurs and derogatory language from elected officials."

"The comments used by Rep. Young do nothing to elevate our party, political discourse or the millions who come here looking for economic opportunity," he continued.


In that order. Party first, political discourse second, people third.

Party first.

Right or wrong?





I miss you dude



Travel well
 
well cornyn is correct, repugs must not say what they think, just what the party line is...of course the 'new' party line(s) are mostly lies designed to bring more minorities into the party...their main problem is how many will believe their lies and will they lose their 'base'

I miss you dude



Travel well
 
Back
Top