Here is the esteemed rightwing SCOTUS judge, citing a Hollywood-scenario from a Television show, as evidence for the need for torture.
WTF? This is supposed to be sound legal and analytical deduction? I couldn't present data and policy choices to management, if I used television shows to support my recommendations....I'd be laughed out of the room:
WTF? This is supposed to be sound legal and analytical deduction? I couldn't present data and policy choices to management, if I used television shows to support my recommendations....I'd be laughed out of the room:
Senior judges from North America and Europe were in the midst of a panel discussion about torture and terrorism law, when a Canadian judge’s passing remark - “Thankfully, security agencies in all our countries do not subscribe to the mantra ‘What would Jack Bauer do?’ ” - got the legal bulldog in [Justice Antonin Scalia] barking.
The conservative jurist stuck up for Agent Bauer, arguing that fictional or not, federal agents require latitude in times of great crisis. “Jack Bauer saved Los Angeles. … He saved hundreds of thousands of lives,” Judge Scalia said. Then, recalling Season 2, where the agent’s rough interrogation tactics saved California from a terrorist nuke, the Supreme Court judge etched a line in the sand.
“Are you going to convict Jack Bauer?” Judge Scalia challenged his fellow judges. “Say that criminal law is against him? ‘You have the right to a jury trial?’ Is any jury going to convict Jack Bauer? I don’t think so.”
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/