What are the benchmark hallmarks for Conservatism, Moderatism, and Liberalism?

R

RFathomR

New member
My question is simply as follows. I am not well versed in the relations as far as from a spectrum view What benchmark hallmarks for Conservatism, Moderatism, and Liberalism?

I feel like the greatest problem I can see in America as far as the 2 major parties are concerned is that neither has a working foundation for realizable policy changes given aspects in each will I express if asked/when it comes to it; conflict with what they look to accomplilsh given cross contaminating platform based belief systems. That being said, I'm not here for arguments, Though I am very well versed in having constructive heated debate conversations regarding measures of balance as this is not my first post upon such measures, though indeed my first when it comes to political matters. With that being said, I would greatly appreciate any information which are hopefully enjoyable for anyone taking part.

Also as a side note, I would be even more impressed if there were some historian accounts of the changes
in political positions/thinking/approaches to policy making/ any kinds of pointers to books on these matters.

Thanks in advance.
 
RFathomR said:
My question is simply as follows. I am not well versed in the relations as far as from a spectrum view What benchmark hallmarks for Conservatism, Moderatism, and Liberalism?

I feel like the greatest problem I can see in America as far as the 2 major parties are concerned is that neither has a working foundation for realizable policy changes given aspects in each will I express if asked/when it comes to it; conflict with what they look to accomplilsh given cross contaminating platform based belief systems. That being said, I'm not here for arguments, Though I am very well versed in having constructive heated debate conversations regarding measures of balance as this is not my first post upon such measures, though indeed my first when it comes to political matters. With that being said, I would greatly appreciate any information which are hopefully enjoyable for anyone taking part.

Also as a side note, I would be even more impressed if there were some historian accounts of the changes
in political positions/thinking/approaches to policy making/ any kinds of pointers to books on these matters.

Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...

First, explain why the distinctions are important. That is the path to the answer.
 
The benchmark for liberalism is a moving target. What was considered fringe left in the 90s is now mainstream left. What is considered fringe left today will be mainstream left in about 10 years.
 
Well the distinctions are important to me, given that I believe that much of life cannot be discerned by exactly that of one particular approach of thinking whatever the case may be when coming up policy that contains multi-mechanical operations to execute, taking a more so cautious and preservational- conservative, centrist- and status quo retaining- moderate, or creative and idealistic though perhaps not always practical- liberal means of continuations. as you can probably gauge sense of already, I don't have the same definitions for each of these as most of the public probably does, therefore I'm looking gauge sense of what other people view as particular critical elements of positiongs and philosophies driven reason towards issues drive people to think of each in the way they do.
 
Woko Haram said:
The benchmark for liberalism is a moving target. What was considered fringe left in the 90s is now mainstream left. What is considered fringe left today will be mainstream left in about 10 years.
Click to expand...

Even then I'd ask more deeply, what did that actually look like, what does it compose of as far as ways of thinking towards resolving problems, foreign, domestic, boarders, representation etc. in relations to what it does not now. I'm looking for specific answers here.
 
RFathomR said:
My question is simply as follows. I am not well versed in the relations as far as from a spectrum view What benchmark hallmarks for Conservatism, Moderatism, and Liberalism?

I feel like the greatest problem I can see in America as far as the 2 major parties are concerned is that neither has a working foundation for realizable policy changes given aspects in each will I express if asked/when it comes to it; conflict with what they look to accomplilsh given cross contaminating platform based belief systems. That being said, I'm not here for arguments, Though I am very well versed in having constructive heated debate conversations regarding measures of balance as this is not my first post upon such measures, though indeed my first when it comes to political matters. With that being said, I would greatly appreciate any information which are hopefully enjoyable for anyone taking part.

Also as a side note, I would be even more impressed if there were some historian accounts of the changes
in political positions/thinking/approaches to policy making/ any kinds of pointers to books on these matters.

Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...

the two party system is a dishonest manipulative system to keep people divided along relatively unimportant axises.

the natural and rational divide is between the rich and powerful and the poor and powerless.

the two parties reinforce a false dichotomy, that dichotomy being that we must choose either a worldview that worships government, or a worldview that worships corporations.

the reality is that corporations and governments collude in a totalitarian fascist monolith to create a permanent ruling class.

thus, every person who buys into this false dichotomy is running around in half truths, unable to see reality.
 
AssHatZombie said:
the two party system is a dishonest manipulative system to keep people divided along relatively unimportant axises.

the natural and rational divide is between the rich and powerful and the poor and powerless.

the two parties reinforce a false dichotomy, that dichotomy being that we must choose either a worldview that worships government, or a worldview that worships corporations.

the reality is that corporations and governments collude in a totalitarian fascist monolith to create a permanent ruling class.

thus, every person who buys into this false dichotomy is running around in half truths, unable to see reality.
Click to expand...

It's nice to see someone else also sees this. That being my said, my question for you is what kind of combination of proponent values would make it easier for people who don't understand that complex- of government, corporation, and I'd add another military as a means to protect the interests of production, to recognize this and deduce that values and money don't equivicate to having same minded philisophical reasons for establishing certain partitions of policy and economic structures in relations to wealth distribution when it comes to supporting a distinct platform with contradictory philosophies behind party proposed benchmark hallmarks?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top