What dem candidate do republicans dislike the most?

[anonymoose]

I don't ask this of dims because it is clear they absolutely hate Tulsi Gabbard who has by far the best chance to beat Trump in 2020.

Whoever republicans consider the worst and least likely to beat Trump is the most likely to be nominated, which is why I ask.

My least favorite is Kamala Harris .
Not only is she from California but she's from San Francisco . Nothing wrong about being from Calif. or San Francisco but a dim politician from there tends to have values so far askewed from the rest of the country it's like being from a different planet.
She's angry and unlikeable with a chip on her shoulder, kinda like IQ64 who's also from the Bay Area.

 

[Nordberg]

Reds have been programmed to hate Warren. Reds are easy to program. Much like the propaganda that the reds used on Hillary for decades.

 

[anonymoose]

Reds have been programmed to hate Warren.

I'll agree with that.

Reds are easy to program.

So are dims. They were programmed to nominate hrc, the worst ever to run for president.

Much like the propaganda that the reds used on Hillary for decades.

It worked, thank goodness. We dodged a bullet.

 

[CharacterAssassin]

I don't ask this of dims because it is clear they absolutely hate Tulsi Gabbard who has by far the best chance to beat Trump in 2020.

Whoever republicans consider the worst and least likely to beat Trump is the most likely to be nominated, which is why I ask.

My least favorite is Kamala Harris .
Not only is she from California but she's from San Francisco . Nothing wrong about being from Calif. or San Francisco but a dim politician from there tends to have values so far askewed from the rest of the country it's like being from a different planet.
She's angry and unlikeable with a chip on her shoulder, kinda like IQ64 who's also from the Bay Area.

Nah. There's no credible evidence that Gabbard has 'by far the best chance to beat Trump in 2020.'

Full on Fantasy Land blathering.

 

[anonymoose]

Nah. There's no credible evidence that Gabbard has 'by far the best chance to beat Trump in 2020.'

Full on Fantasy Land blathering.

There's no credible evidence that anybody has the best chance to beat Trump.
Anyway, no repub has answered. And your reply indicates to me she's definitely not one of your favorites.

 

[CFM]

Nah. There's no credible evidence that Gabbard has 'by far the best chance to beat Trump in 2020.'

Full on Fantasy Land blathering.

If the person the Democrat's poster child deemed the most qualified to serve as President can't be someone those same Democrats consider an idiot, no identity politics the left puts up can win. Perhaps the Democrats should find a transgender, bisexual, mixed race, hermaphrodite to run and get all of the causes rolled into one.

 

[CharacterAssassin]

There's no credible evidence that anybody has the best chance to beat Trump.
Anyway, no repub has answered. And your reply indicates to me she's definitely not one of your favorites.

Then why did you make that asinine claim in the first place?

 

[anonymoose]

Then why did you make that asinine claim in the first place?

it's my opinion. Nobody's opinion is credible at this point. Did I really have to say, "IMO" when it was obvious?

 

[anonymoose]

If the person the Democrat's poster child deemed the most qualified to serve as President can't be someone those same Democrats consider an idiot, no identity politics the left puts up can win. Perhaps the Democrats should find a transgender, bisexual, mixed race, hermaphrodite to run and get all of the causes rolled into one.

That would be their dream candidate. Unfortunately none meeting those qualifications has showed interest.

 

[evince]

Putin doesn't tell them anything to think on the issue


so the right has no opinion on this subject

 

[Nordberg]

I'll agree with that. So are dims. They were programmed to nominate hrc, the worst ever to run for president. It worked, thank goodness. We dodged a bullet.

Sorry, but they were actually allowing Bernie to debate her on their dime. Hillary had great experience and education. She was a very good candidate who the Red machine attacked for decades. Trump is a big fat joke. 2 years in and he had lots of openings in his admin that he cannot even fill. He has put lobbyists in charge of departments that used to regulate them. And he shiut down the fucking government. How bad can it get? Hang on, Daffy will show you.

 

[anonymoose]

Sorry, but they were actually allowing Bernie to debate her on their dime.

hrc is a '90's relic that figured a self proclaimed socialist had no chance. She figured he be considered the "silly Marxist". She miscalculated, otherwise she wouldn't have allowed Bernie in the debates.

Hillary had great experience and education.

So did Nixon. What's the point?

She was a very good candidate who the Red machine attacked for decades.

If she was so good why couldn't she win and win easily against a clown like Trump?

Trump is a big fat joke.

Yet he won. You might want to think about who you nominated.

How bad can it get? Hang on, Daffy will show you.

Admittedly it's bad. Has been for a while. About 18 yrs.