What the frack?

stoned

Verified User
.......Yet countless studies show that because the fracking process leaks so much methane — a highly potent greenhouse gas — fracked gas isn’t a climate solution. In fact, “natural gas could warm the planet as much as coal in the short term,” one major 24-author study from June concluded. So those who continue touting fracked gas as a bridge to a low-carbon future are not keeping up with the latest science............

.....One key point the study makes is that, unlike other energy sources, much of the water fracking uses is essentially lost to humanity. Either the water doesn’t escape the shale formation or, when it does come back to the surface, it “is highly saline, is difficult to treat, and is often disposed through deep injection wells.”

Therefore, even though other forms of energy have a higher intensity of water use, “the permanent loss of water use for hydraulic fracturing from the hydrosphere” may still be higher.......

........As Ingraffea put it, “shale gas/oil is exchanging absurd volumes of water for absurd volumes of fossil fuels at a time where using the latter is jeopardizing the availability of the former.” At the same time, fracking “is exchanging precious volumes of water usable for drinking and farming for toxic volumes of wastewater most of which has to be transported and injected underground,” at grave risk to underground sources of drinking water. Finally, “most of what is not transported and injected stays underground, an exchange of H2O for CO2.” Therefore, almost all of what arrives at a well is forever lost to the water cycle...........

https://thinkprogress.org/fracking-is-destr...y-9cb163923d24/
 
.......Yet countless studies show that because the fracking process leaks so much methane — a highly potent greenhouse gas — fracked gas isn’t a climate solution. In fact, “natural gas could warm the planet as much as coal in the short term,” one major 24-author study from June concluded. So those who continue touting fracked gas as a bridge to a low-carbon future are not keeping up with the latest science............

.....One key point the study makes is that, unlike other energy sources, much of the water fracking uses is essentially lost to humanity. Either the water doesn’t escape the shale formation or, when it does come back to the surface, it “is highly saline, is difficult to treat, and is often disposed through deep injection wells.”

Therefore, even though other forms of energy have a higher intensity of water use, “the permanent loss of water use for hydraulic fracturing from the hydrosphere” may still be higher.......

........As Ingraffea put it, “shale gas/oil is exchanging absurd volumes of water for absurd volumes of fossil fuels at a time where using the latter is jeopardizing the availability of the former.” At the same time, fracking “is exchanging precious volumes of water usable for drinking and farming for toxic volumes of wastewater most of which has to be transported and injected underground,” at grave risk to underground sources of drinking water. Finally, “most of what is not transported and injected stays underground, an exchange of H2O for CO2.” Therefore, almost all of what arrives at a well is forever lost to the water cycle...........

https://thinkprogress.org/fracking-is-destr...y-9cb163923d24/

 
Hello stoned,,

.......Yet countless studies show that because the fracking process leaks so much methane — a highly potent greenhouse gas — fracked gas isn’t a climate solution. In fact, “natural gas could warm the planet as much as coal in the short term,” one major 24-author study from June concluded. So those who continue touting fracked gas as a bridge to a low-carbon future are not keeping up with the latest science............

.....One key point the study makes is that, unlike other energy sources, much of the water fracking uses is essentially lost to humanity. Either the water doesn’t escape the shale formation or, when it does come back to the surface, it “is highly saline, is difficult to treat, and is often disposed through deep injection wells.”

Therefore, even though other forms of energy have a higher intensity of water use, “the permanent loss of water use for hydraulic fracturing from the hydrosphere” may still be higher.......

........As Ingraffea put it, “shale gas/oil is exchanging absurd volumes of water for absurd volumes of fossil fuels at a time where using the latter is jeopardizing the availability of the former.” At the same time, fracking “is exchanging precious volumes of water usable for drinking and farming for toxic volumes of wastewater most of which has to be transported and injected underground,” at grave risk to underground sources of drinking water. Finally, “most of what is not transported and injected stays underground, an exchange of H2O for CO2.” Therefore, almost all of what arrives at a well is forever lost to the water cycle...........

https://thinkprogress.org/fracking-is-destr...y-9cb163923d24/

All excellent points. Not to mention the earthquakes caused by fracking. It's just a bad idea.

One energy source which does show promise is actually new nuclear. Check out that Bill Gates project in China. Those plants can't have a melt down because they're designed using a completely different technology. AND the fuel they use is nothing but the spent fuel from old tech nuclear. Thus, this concept solves two huge problems. Where to get clean energy that doesn't add to global warming; and what to do with spent fuel.

It's called a traveling wave reactor.

It could change everything. Gates is such a big thinker, such a forward thinker.

They couldn't do it in the USA because our nuclear regulatory system has no way to deal with the completely different engineering of this new concept. That's why they are building the first one in China. We need to catch up. This could be our 'Get Out Of Global Warming Free' card.
 
Hello stoned,,



All excellent points. Not to mention the earthquakes caused by fracking. It's just a bad idea.

One energy source which does show promise is actually new nuclear. Check out that Bill Gates project in China. Those plants can't have a melt down because they're designed using a completely different technology. AND the fuel they use is nothing but the spent fuel from old tech nuclear. Thus, this concept solves two huge problems. Where to get clean energy that doesn't add to global warming; and what to do with spent fuel.

It's called a traveling wave reactor.

It could change everything. Gates is such a big thinker, such a forward thinker.

They couldn't do it in the USA because our nuclear regulatory system has no way to deal with the completely different engineering of this new concept. That's why they are building the first one in China. We need to catch up. This could be our 'Get Out Of Global Warming Free' card.


Your post is one stupid post
 
Back
Top