No it is not Russian collusion
https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/04/politics/paul-manafort-hearing/index.html
https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/04/politics/paul-manafort-hearing/index.html
What the special council is really after
- Thread starter Evmetro
- Start date
Excellent. This judge gets it.
Leonthecat
Racism Watchdog
What the special council is really after
What the special council is really after
I did not expect any lefties to respond to this thread, but you are the lone lefty who did. You didn't actually have anything to say, but you felt compelled to at least post something. It was not anything of merit, but it was something.
Althea
Althea told me...
Get back to us when he makes a ruling.
CharacterAssassin
Verified User
I was expecting a dimbulb right winger life you to try and pass this off as something more than it actually is, and see that you're still dependent on the magical thinking that arises from your desperation to take the heat off your god, Twump.
Educate yourself, simp:
Exactly, judges often play devil’s advocate in trying to understand the nature of the case.
CharacterAssassin
Verified User
It never ceases to amaze me, the amount of willful, almost gleeful blinkard pig-ignorance and wishful thinking it must require to certain people to convincing themselves that, "AHA! THIS is finally the end of Mueller investigation! It was all just a fishing expedition the ENTIRE time! DEEEEEEEEEP STAAAATE LOSES!!!"
They simply have no stomach for honestly understanding that amount of trouble Trump and his associates and organization are in.
Don't worry, I did not expect that you would objectively read the article and extract how it related to the title of the thread and then present intelligent arguments. An "objective lefty" is an oxymoron.
Don't worry, I did not expect that you would objectively read the article and extract how it related to the title of the thread and then present intelligent arguments. An "objective lefty" is an oxymoron.
The Judge did not say it wasn’t Russian Collusion?!?
CharacterAssassin
Verified User
Relax: no one here seriously expects you to understand the situation or what's actually involved in it. WAY above your intellectual pay grade.
This is a plausible path that could justify the lefty narrative. It is your lefty duty to provide nothing more than any plausible paths that could potentially support the lefty narrative, so good job on your post. Don't worry, I did not expect that you would objectively read the article and extract how it related to the title of the thread and then present intelligent arguments. An "objective lefty" is an oxymoron.
Don't worry, I did not expect that you would objectively read the article and extract how it related to the title of the thread and then present intelligent arguments. An "objective lefty" is an oxymoron.
Don't worry, I did not expect that you would objectively read the article and extract how it related to the title of the thread and then present intelligent arguments. An "objective lefty" is an oxymoron.
CharacterAssassin
Verified User
Relax: no one here seriously expects you to understand the situation or what's actually involved in it. WAY above your intellectual pay grade.
Clearly you've been drinking and are in no position to make any rational comments.
Don't worry, I did not expect that you would objectively read the article and extract how it related to the title of the thread and then present intelligent arguments. An "objective lefty" is an oxymoron.
How will you feel when the judge allows this trial to go forward? Perhaps before you berate all of us, you should wait for his ruling.
CharacterAssassin
Verified User
Relax: no one here seriously expects you to understand the situation or what's actually involved in it. WAY above your intellectual pay grade.
Clearly you've been drinking and are in no position to make any rational comments.
I will answer this if you can demonstrate that you have objectively read the article and can explain why I titled the thread the way I did. "Objectively" summarizing this will open the door to intelligent debate and discussion, and it won't hurt you political position.