What will you do

What will you do?

  • Accept the verdict

    Votes: 4 100.0%

  • Blame the verdict on the Police

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Blame the verdict on the jury

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Blame it all on racism

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Secretly hope that he is murdered

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    4
It isn't about what anyone here will do. It's about what he will do with his life. He's already paid dearly for his actions. He'll be broke for quite some time. Likewise, he'll live in fear for the rest of his life. He'll never know when someone will stand their ground against him.

And, he will more than likely face a civil trial that will leave him with the burden of insurmountable debt forever.
 
evince said:
what did you do when OJ was equited?
Click to expand...

we watched it in class and I celebrated cause I was a 10 year old troll and saw that all the adults thought he should be guilty so I just went with the opposite. When they said not guilty I ran out to recess cheering.
 
evince said:
what did you do when OJ was equited?
Click to expand...
I shrugged my shoulders at over blown media hype but agreed with the verdict. It was obvious that reasonable doubt existed as to his guilt. Most of the bombastic crap from the media about "jury nullification" was total bullshit. The Jurors drew the correct conclusion based on the evidence.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
I shrugged my shoulders at over blown media hype but agreed with the verdict. It was obvious that reasonable doubt existed as to his guilt. Most of the bombastic crap from the media about "jury nullification" was total bullshit. The Jurors drew the correct conclusion based on the evidence.
Click to expand...

you get a tom award for this post

:tomtom:
 
it means your post is retarded. my god every time I think you can't be stupider you prove me wrong.
 
mott thinks oj should have walked and zimmerman should get life. lol down is up good is bad, black is white for mott.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Do you mean OJ should have been convicted of her murder despite the obvious reasonable doubt that existed?
Click to expand...

I didn't see reasonable doubt. But as I said, juries see more than I do and I generally believe in the system. Surprise isn't the same thing as outrage.
 
King of Owls said:
mott thinks oj should have walked and zimmerman should get life. lol down is up good is bad, black is white for mott.
Click to expand...
I have never made no such comment about Zimmerman. I was appaled at the Zimmerman case in that lethal force was used in what may have been an unjustifiable excuse and due process of law was not exercised. That was the source of most of the outrage in the Zimmerman case. As long as the due process of law is respected and, as in the OJ case, reasonable doubt is found then I could care less if he walks. It's the rule of law that must be respected. You just can't expect to pop a cap in someones ass with out proper justification and expect to just walk.

As for the OJ case. If anyone is being retarded here it's you. What the hell do you know about the OJ case? You were just a snot nosed kid at the time and probably don't know a damned thing relevent to the case. When the OJ trial went down I was working as a research assistant at a major State University doing similar type forensic analytical work and had been for 7 years.

So what the hell do you know about the OJ case?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top