What would JPP leftists say if Trump did this?

Teflon Don

I'm back baby
Let's say Trump directed the intelligence community to put out into the universe that one of his political opponents was "colluding" with Iran and used uncorroborated intelligence to do it?

What would you lefties say?

Let's say Trump was out of office for 8 years when you found out? Would you let it go? Would you say "well, he isn't President anymore so it doesn't matter"?

Asking for a friend
 
Let's say Trump directed the intelligence community to put out into the universe that one of his political opponents was "colluding" with Iran and used uncorroborated intelligence to do it?

What would you lefties say?

Let's say Trump was out of office for 8 years when you found out? Would you let it go? Would you say "well, he isn't President anymore so it doesn't matter"?

Asking for a friend
You have evidence someone did this?
 
Just answer the question. What would you say if there was evidence that Trump did it? Why can’t you just answer the question Veruca? Did the question confuse you? Did you not understand it? Are you too chicken to go on record?
I would say it was unbecoming of a president. Possibly illegal depending on the details.

Now answer my question.


Do you have and evidence Obama did this?
 
Let's say Trump directed the intelligence community to put out into the universe that one of his political opponents was "colluding" with Iran and used uncorroborated intelligence to do it?

What would you lefties say?

Let's say Trump was out of office for 8 years when you found out? Would you let it go? Would you say "well, he isn't President anymore so it doesn't matter"?

Asking for a friend

You cannot expect an intelligent response from brainwashed mentally ill Leftists.
 
Let's say Trump directed the intelligence community to put out into the universe that one of his political opponents was "colluding" with Iran and used uncorroborated intelligence to do it?

What would you lefties say?

Let's say Trump was out of office for 8 years when you found out? Would you let it go? Would you say "well, he isn't President anymore so it doesn't matter"?

Asking for a friend
See the problem is - your entire premise is a lie. Keep trying to "fuck that chicken" though :)
 
Let's say Trump directed the intelligence community to put out into the universe that one of his political opponents was "colluding" with Iran and used uncorroborated intelligence to do it?

What would you lefties say?

Let's say Trump was out of office for 8 years when you found out? Would you let it go? Would you say "well, he isn't President anymore so it doesn't matter"?

Asking for a friend
1753634716035.png
 
Let's say Trump directed the intelligence community to put out into the universe that one of his political opponents was "colluding" with Iran and used uncorroborated intelligence to do it?

What would you lefties say?

Let's say Trump was out of office for 8 years when you found out? Would you let it go? Would you say "well, he isn't President anymore so it doesn't matter"?

Asking for a friend
What would happen Trump without documentation still claimed that an election five years ago was crooked even though endless proof existed from multiple credible sources that the election was legitimate and fair?

What would MAGA say?

Let’s say in eight years Trump was still saying it without any new proof, would MAGA still believe it?

Asking you
 
So you won’t answer my question?

I don't believe you when you say that you would say it was unbecoming. Your history around Trump doesn't support that statement. You overflow everything he does that you think is negative and constantly make mountains out of molehills.

PS

There is proof that Obama did it. Tulsi Gabbard provided the receipts. They are there for you to find if you are so interested. I doubt that you are. Or you are going to play the leftist game of "provide me the link". It is out there Veruca, you find it.

Obama is guilty. You are a hypocrite.

Two things I knew to be true before I even started this thread
 
What would happen Trump without documentation still claimed that an election five years ago was crooked even though endless proof existed from multiple credible sources that the election was legitimate and fair?

What would MAGA say?

Let’s say in eight years Trump was still saying it without any new proof, would MAGA still believe it?

Asking you
I don't believe you when you say that you would say it was unbecoming. Your history around Trump doesn't support that statement. You overflow everything he does that you think is negative and constantly make mountains out of molehills.

PS

There is proof that Obama did it. Tulsi Gabbard provided the receipts. They are there for you to find if you are so interested. I doubt that you are. Or you are going to play the leftist game of "provide me the link". It is out there Veruca, you find it.

Obama is guilty. You are a hypocrite.

Two things I knew to be true before I even started this thread
What Trump says or doesn't say about the 2020 election has zero impact on me. I know that it was stolen through various means.

There was ZERO proof that it was legitimate and fair. Just the fact that three swing states all decided to "stop counting" in the middle of the night with Trump ahead? And then magically the guy who couldn't pull 100 people in an elementary school gym was magically ahead?

Or that you really believe that Biden drew more voters than both Obama and Hillary and himself in 2024?

So it doesn't matter what Trump says, I will always believe it was a stolen election.

Nice try at deflection now answer the question. My guess is you won't. You would never want to put yourself on the hook to have to be mad at your Messiah B. Hussein Obama
 
I don't believe you when you say that you would say it was unbecoming. Your history around Trump doesn't support that statement. You overflow everything he does that you think is negative and constantly make mountains out of molehills.

PS

There is proof that Obama did it. Tulsi Gabbard provided the receipts. They are there for you to find if you are so interested. I doubt that you are. Or you are going to play the leftist game of "provide me the link". It is out there Veruca, you find it.

Obama is guilty. You are a hypocrite.

Two things I knew to be true before I even started this thread
What “receipts” Did Tulsi provide, nobody seems able to show them?

1) nothing shows Obama directing this,
2) it’s not illegal to publish a report that has different findings from an earlier report.
 
What “receipts” Did Tulsi provide, nobody seems able to show them?

1) nothing shows Obama directing this,
2) it’s not illegal to publish a report that has different findings from an earlier report.
You aren't paying attention Veruca. They are out there. She did a press conference and everything.

Remember when you shit your pants over the Iraqi intelligence about WMD? Oh you will wail that "THAT GOT US INTO WAR"

Well, this lie about intelligence directed a soft coup against a sitting President. That is treason.
 
You aren't paying attention Veruca. They are out there. She did a press conference and everything.

Remember when you shit your pants over the Iraqi intelligence about WMD? Oh you will wail that "THAT GOT US INTO WAR"

Well, this lie about intelligence directed a soft coup against a sitting President. That is treason.
yes we remember the lies told over WMD in Iraq which are good parallel for the lies Tulsi is telling over the Russian interference in the election.

Senate Intelligence Committee Findings on Russian Interference (2016 Election):


  • 🇷🇺 Russia engaged in a comprehensive, multi-faceted campaign to interfere in the 2016 U.S. election, primarily aimed at helping Donald Trump and harming Hillary Clinton.
  • 🕵️‍♂️ Russian military intelligence (GRU) conducted cyber operations:
    • Hacked Democratic Party emails (DNC, DCCC, Clinton campaign).
    • Released stolen materials via WikiLeaks, DCLeaks, and Guccifer 2.0.
  • 💻 Russian Internet Research Agency (IRA) carried out extensive social media influence campaigns:
    • Targeted U.S. voters to sow division and promote pro-Trump messaging.
    • Focused on race, immigration, gun rights, and other polarizing topics.
  • 🔍 Trump campaign had numerous contacts with Russian officials, but:

    • The Trump campaign welcomed and exploited Russian help.
  • 🤝 Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort shared sensitive polling data with a Russian intelligence-linked individual (Konstantin Kilimnik), which posed a "grave counterintelligence threat."
  • 🔐 U.S. election infrastructure was probed:
    • Russia targeted election systems in all 50 states.
    • No evidence that vote tallies were changed, but the effort exposed vulnerabilities.
 

Mueller Report Summary: Russian Interference in 2016 Election


📘


  • Two main efforts by Russia to interfere in the 2016 election:
    1. Social Media Influence Campaign – Led by the Internet Research Agency (IRA):
      • Created fake U.S. personas and social media groups.
      • Promoted Trump, disparaged Clinton, and aimed to sow division.
      • Reached millions of Americans across Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.
    2. Hacking & Dissemination of Democratic Emails – Conducted by GRU (Russian military intelligence):
      • Hacked DNC, DCCC, and Clinton campaign (via John Podesta).
      • Released materials via WikiLeaks, DCLeaks, and Guccifer 2.0.
      • Aimed to damage Clinton and aid Trump.
  • 🤝 Trump Campaign Contacts with Russians:
    • Multiple links and contacts between Trump associates and individuals tied to the Russian government.
    • The campaign expected to benefit from Russia’s actions and did not report contacts to the FBI.
    • No criminal conspiracy established between the Trump campaign and Russia.
    • However, Mueller did not exonerate the campaign from ethical concerns or counterintelligence risks.



📘

 
Add to the above the Durham Special Counsel Investigation which looked for any any government criminality specifically with regards to the investigation into Russian and the 2016 elections and COULD FIND NOTHING other than his views on a handful of discretionary prosecutorial decisions which is his way of saying he would have done a few things differently. But he found ZERO wrong doing specific to the investigation that would delegitimize it.
 
You aren't paying attention Veruca. They are out there. She did a press conference and everything.

Remember when you shit your pants over the Iraqi intelligence about WMD? Oh you will wail that "THAT GOT US INTO WAR"

Well, this lie about intelligence directed a soft coup against a sitting President. That is treason.
I am not asking about her verbal lies and inuendo, I am asking about any documents that show Obama directed a crime.

Or anything that says having a report that contradicts prior info is illegal.
 
You aren't paying attention Veruca. They are out there. She did a press conference and everything.

Remember when you shit your pants over the Iraqi intelligence about WMD? Oh you will wail that "THAT GOT US INTO WAR"

Well, this lie about intelligence directed a soft coup against a sitting President. That is treason.
Silly hyperbole.
 
I am not asking about her verbal lies and inuendo, I am asking about any documents that show Obama directed a crime.

Or anything that says having a report that contradicts prior info is illegal.
She showed the receipts. I understand your need to ignore them. I do enjoy the lawyering you are doing. Me thinks you know Obama knowingly launched investigations into Trump with fake intel. Everyone knew Steele dossier was a fraud. Yet you believed it. Do you feel shame for believing there was a pee pee tape?
 
Back
Top