Nothing worse than incompetent DEI hires being placed on the bench. But that has been the despicable strategy of Democrats since Obamunism. Now we are seeing how woefully ignorant and incompetent these leftist activists really are.
Needless to say, to arrive at this ruling, the court had to do some serious mental gymnastics.
“The whole idea that you don’t have to get into the United States to get into the United States is stupid,” said Rosemary Jenks, policy director of the Immigration Accountability Project.
Yes.
But this is the state of much of today’s judiciary.
Leftist judges: If they’re not busily activating on behalf of leftist causes, they’re just as busily putting their minds to work to bang out the next batch of tortured logic to support their leftist causes.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has forged a whole career out of it so far. Here’s a woman who couldn’t even define during her confirmation hearings what a woman is — yet she was still given the key to a lifetime appointment of deciding on the constitutionality of matters that impact the entire nation. And it didn’t take long for her to put her twisted philosophies to work.
“Amy Coney Barrett Rebukes Ketanji Brown Jackson’s ‘Extreme’ Opinion,” Newsweek wrote, after the high court released its ruling on Trump v. CASA, making clear lower courts can’t simply wipe out executively issued orders by issuing injunctions and also making clear, in effect, the right of the White House to limit birthplace citizenship. Jackson called the decision an “existential threat to the rule of law.” Justice Amy Coney Barrett called Jackson’s dissent “extreme” and went on to say, “We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial executive while embracing an imperial judiciary.”
But the left loves Jackson.
The left sees her as a great disruptor, a magnificent voice of dissent, a necessary polemicist at a time when the court has pulled too far to the ideological right.
That she probably uses the pages of the Constitution to wipe her butt is of little consequence to Democrats. To leftists, to anti-MAGAs, all that matters is that she can string together erudite-sounding arguments that can be broken into little flashy bits to sell through the Trump Deranged infected media into the ears of the Trump Deranged infected masses.
When judges are so smart they’re stupid
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in a majority opinion penned by Judge Michelle Friedland, ruled that migrants who have reached the “doorstep” of the United States, but not physically crossed into the country, must be treated the same as those who’ve physically crossed into the country and therefore given their due rights to claim asylum. In other words: Borders? What borders? America’s borders aren’t really borders. They’re more like recommendations.Needless to say, to arrive at this ruling, the court had to do some serious mental gymnastics.
“The whole idea that you don’t have to get into the United States to get into the United States is stupid,” said Rosemary Jenks, policy director of the Immigration Accountability Project.
Yes.
But this is the state of much of today’s judiciary.
Leftist judges: If they’re not busily activating on behalf of leftist causes, they’re just as busily putting their minds to work to bang out the next batch of tortured logic to support their leftist causes.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has forged a whole career out of it so far. Here’s a woman who couldn’t even define during her confirmation hearings what a woman is — yet she was still given the key to a lifetime appointment of deciding on the constitutionality of matters that impact the entire nation. And it didn’t take long for her to put her twisted philosophies to work.
“Amy Coney Barrett Rebukes Ketanji Brown Jackson’s ‘Extreme’ Opinion,” Newsweek wrote, after the high court released its ruling on Trump v. CASA, making clear lower courts can’t simply wipe out executively issued orders by issuing injunctions and also making clear, in effect, the right of the White House to limit birthplace citizenship. Jackson called the decision an “existential threat to the rule of law.” Justice Amy Coney Barrett called Jackson’s dissent “extreme” and went on to say, “We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial executive while embracing an imperial judiciary.”
But the left loves Jackson.
The left sees her as a great disruptor, a magnificent voice of dissent, a necessary polemicist at a time when the court has pulled too far to the ideological right.
That she probably uses the pages of the Constitution to wipe her butt is of little consequence to Democrats. To leftists, to anti-MAGAs, all that matters is that she can string together erudite-sounding arguments that can be broken into little flashy bits to sell through the Trump Deranged infected media into the ears of the Trump Deranged infected masses.