Where is the proof?

C

Cancel 2018.2

Oh, hi
Liberals immediately demanded this when Trump made his dumbass tweet that Obama wiretapped his Trump tower.

Yet, we still have no proof of any collusion between Trump and Russia to secure his election, YET, liberals pretend it is a fact.

Knock it off. Grow up.

I doubt there is any proof Obama had Trump towers wiretapped. I think Trump read brietbart and said, oh look there is proof.

Okay liberals, where is the proof of collusion? If you don't have any by now, then stand down.
 
Yaya said:
Liberals immediately demanded this when Trump made his dumbass tweet that Obama wiretapped his Trump tower.

Yet, we still have no proof of any collusion between Trump and Russia to secure his election, YET, liberals pretend it is a fact.

Knock it off. Grow up.

I doubt there is any proof Obama had Trump towers wiretapped. I think Trump read brietbart and said, oh look there is proof.

Okay liberals, where is the proof of collusion? If you don't have any by now, then stand down.
Click to expand...
It is called an ongoing investigation, things will be revealed when the investigation is done, we will then find out if there was collusion or no collusion. You just have to be patient. The Watergate investigation took awhile.
 
Yaya said:
Liberals immediately demanded this when Trump made his dumbass tweet that Obama wiretapped his Trump tower.

Yet, we still have no proof of any collusion between Trump and Russia to secure his election, YET, liberals pretend it is a fact.

Knock it off. Grow up.

I doubt there is any proof Obama had Trump towers wiretapped. I think Trump read brietbart and said, oh look there is proof.

Okay liberals, where is the proof of collusion? If you don't have any by now, then stand down.
Click to expand...

Where's the proof?
 
it's bizarreness..besides what was this supposed Russian interference?
Was hacking the DNC and Podesta worth any "Russian collusion"- because that's all they did.

It's Russiaphobia by the IC coupled with Democrats "resistance" at full bloom..a Nothingburger
 
Queen Snowflake said:
It is called an ongoing investigation, things will be revealed when the investigation is done, we will then find out if there was collusion or no collusion. You just have to be patient. The Watergate investigation took awhile.
Click to expand...

I agree.....let the investigation continue it will be bigger than watergate when the truth comes out about the leaking of classified information and how the previous administration weaponized the federal police agencies for political gain. Now more than ever there needs to be an "independent" investigation. The demwits will regret ever beginning this witch hunt as the only evidence tying anyone to a crime is found on the left side of the isle. The truth does not belong to one party to mold as they will. :)

Reason, logic and common sense reveals the only conclusion possible: This supposed collusion investigation of a connection between Trump and Russia (with the Clinton machine omitted from the investigation for some odd reason, who had demonstrable evidences of Russian contact) has been ongoing since the summer of 2015.....if the evidence had existed (as no new evidence is possible under the Trump administration since taking office in Jan 2017) while Obama ruled.....Trump would be in prison as we speak. Thus the only remaining evidences to be presented are evidences of how all this supposedly classified ongoing investigation and information was constantly leaked to the press and congress with the names of US CITIZENS revealed for political reasons.

By all means....continue the investigation. The AG was smarter than anyone assumes and he played the dimwits like a cheap fiddle (when he stepped down as the lead investigator)...now he can prosecute any findings of fact void of having the appearance of conflict. He will fry any Obama appointee found to have actually broken the letter of the law.
 
Last edited:
Yaya said:
Liberals immediately demanded this when Trump made his dumbass tweet that Obama wiretapped his Trump tower.

Yet, we still have no proof of any collusion between Trump and Russia to secure his election, YET, liberals pretend it is a fact.

Knock it off. Grow up.

I doubt there is any proof Obama had Trump towers wiretapped. I think Trump read brietbart and said, oh look there is proof.

Okay liberals, where is the proof of collusion? If you don't have any by now, then stand down.
Click to expand...

Queen Snowflake said:
It is called an ongoing investigation, things will be revealed when the investigation is done, we will then find out if there was collusion or no collusion. You just have to be patient. The Watergate investigation took awhile.
Click to expand...
Notice how they carefully qualify their question with the bolded text above? There was collusion. That isn't up for debate. Some of it was illegal. Some of it was dangerous...like having Russian/Turkish operatives privy to classified briefings.

Whether or not the Russian propaganda machine caused the trump win, or whether it was the fact that Hillary was the wrong candidate in a year when 'change at any cost' was the dominant theme will be debated for years to come.

But the collusion is not up for debate.
 
Let the investigation go to completion. It is disturbing, however, that Mary McCord, the DOJ attorney heading that end of the investigation, resigned so abruptly. The question is, why?
 
domer76 said:
You have no interest in trying to determine if there were American actors involved with the Russians and the Russian's attempts to influence our election?
Click to expand...

You said let the investigation continue. I'm asking why we should. The way I've always seen this happen in order to even begin an investigation you have to have some sort of evidence something happened that needs to be investigated. What's the evidence here that justifies an investigation even being started up in the first place?
 
Guille said:
You said let the investigation continue. I'm asking why we should. The way I've always seen this happen in order to even begin an investigation you have to have some sort of evidence something happened that needs to be investigated. What's the evidence here that justifies an investigation even being started up in the first place?
Click to expand...
Did you just wake from a year long nap?
 
Queen Snowflake said:
It is called an ongoing investigation, things will be revealed when the investigation is done, we will then find out if there was collusion or no collusion. You just have to be patient. The Watergate investigation took awhile.
Click to expand...

Exactly this.

This wasn't instigated by "liberals." 16 intelligence agencies started it.
 
domer76 said:
You have no interest in trying to determine if there were American actors involved with the Russians and the Russian's attempts to influence our election?
Click to expand...

Why not.....investigate the DEMOCRAT..i.e., CLINTON collusion with Russian and Putin along with the Trump Team? There is more objective evidence that the Clinton Machine had more to gain by being in bed with the Russians than Trump....less we forget the Canadian "Uranium" scandal where both Clintons spearheaded the authorization that allowed Putin to purchase North American Uranium mines while the Clinton Charities suddenly was infused with millions of dollars from Russia as a (wink, wink) speaking fee, with the owner of the mining conglomerate being a proven campaign contributor to Bill Clinton's presidential campaign.


Thus far after 18 months under Obama's investigative weaponizing of the US intelligence agencies....there is NO EVIDENCE that Trump done anything other than attempt to establish "de' tente" with another Nation. There was no trail of money exchanging as is the case with the Clintons.

And we find another "strange" occurrence ...... THE DNC was the only campaign that was hacked, that could have only been accomplished with some inside agent/help within the campaign as there is no way in hell that Trump could have passed the fire wall pass words to the Russians, unless the demwits in charge are the dumbest SOBs in campaign history. Sounds to me like a back up plan to blame RUSSIA and TRUMP if Hillary had her ass kicked. She must have known from her own sources that the polls were flawed and it was a hell of lot closer than the media was pretending it to be.



Let the investigation go forth as long as its complete, objective, and not biased while conducted and carried out by the letter of the law.
 
Last edited:
Thing1 said:
Interesting. So our entire intelligence community is basically worthless and not credible at all now?
Click to expand...

That's right. When you reference 16 agencies you're trying to build...wait for it..."consensus". That no longer means anything because prior to 911 those agencies were independent...they no longer are.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top