who's responsible for gun violence??????

Who Inflicts the Most Gun Violence in America? The U.S. Government and Its Police Forces

“It is often the case that police shootings, incidents where law enforcement officers pull the trigger on civilians, are left out of the conversation on gun violence. But a police officer shooting a civilian counts as gun violence. Every time an officer uses a gun against an innocent or an unarmed person contributes to the culture of gun violence in this country.”—Journalist Celisa Calacal

Consider that five years after police shot and killed an unarmed 18-year-old man in Ferguson, Missouri, there has been no relief from the government’s gun violence.

Here’s what we’ve learned about the government’s gun violence since Ferguson, according to The Washington Post: If you’re a black American, you’ve got a greater chance of being shot by police. If you’re an unarmed black man, you’re four times more likely to be killed by police than an unarmed white man. Most people killed by police are young men. Since 2015, police have shot and killed an average of 3 people per day. More than 2,500 police departments have shot and killed at least one person since 2015. And while the vast majority of people shot and killed by police are armed, their weapons ranged from guns to knives to toyguns.

Clearly, the U.S. government is not making America any safer.

Indeed, the government’s gun violence—inflicted on unarmed individuals by battlefield-trained SWAT teams, militarized police, and bureaucratic government agents trained to shoot first and ask questions later—poses a greater threat to the safety and security of the nation than any mass shooter.

According to journalist Matt Agorist, “mass shootings … have claimed the lives of 339 people since 2015… [D]uring this same time frame, police in America have claimed the lives of 4,355 citizens.”

That’s 1200% more people killed by police than mass shooters since 2015.

For example, in Texas, a police officer sent to do a welfare check on a 30-year-old woman seen lying on the grass near a shopping center, took aim at the woman’s dog as it ran towards him barking, fired multiple times, and killed the woman instead.

In Chicago, a SWAT team—wearing “army fatigues with black cloth covering their faces and wearing goggles,” armed with automatic rifles, and throwing flash-bang grenades—crashed through the doors of a suburban home and proceeded to storm into bedrooms, holding the children of the household at gunpoint. One child, 13-year-old Amir, was “accidentally” shot in the knee by police while sitting on his bed.

In St. Louis, Missouri, a SWAT team on a mission to deliver an administrative warrant carried out a no-knock raid that ended with police kicking in the homeowner’s front door, and shooting and killing her dog—all over an unpaid gas bill. Taxpayers will have to find $750,000 to settle the lawsuit arising over the cops’ overzealous tactics.

In South Carolina, a 62-year-old homeowner was shot four times through his front door by police who were investigating a medical-assist alarm call that originated from a cell phone inside the home. Dick Tench, believing his house was being broken into, was standing in the foyer of his home armed with a handgun when police, peering through the front door, fired several shots through the door, hitting Tench in the pelvis and the aortic artery. Tench survived, but the bullet lodged in his pelvis will stay there for life.

In Kansas, a SWAT team, attempting to carry out a routine search warrant (the suspect had already been arrested), showed up at a residence around dinnertime, dressed in tactical gear with weapons drawn, and hurled a flash-bang grenade into the house past the 68-year-old woman who was in the process of opening the door to them and in the general direction of a 2-year-old child.

These are just a few recent examples among hundreds this year alone.

Curiously enough, in the midst of the finger-pointing over the latest round of mass shootings, Americans have been so focused on debating who or what is responsible for gun violence—the guns, the gun owners, the Second Amendment, the politicians, or our violent culture—that they have overlooked the fact that the systemic violence being perpetrated by agents of the government has done more collective harm to the American people and their liberties than any single act of terror or mass shooting.

Violence has become our government’s calling card, starting at the top and trickling down, from the more than 80,000 SWAT team raids carried out every year on unsuspecting Americans by heavily armed, black-garbed commandos and the increasingly rapid militarization of local police forces across the country to the drone killings used to target insurgents.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/08...ica-the-u-s-government-and-its-police-forces/
 
Now is “Lee Rockwell” and relation to the infamous Lincoln Rockwell? Based on the article, got to be blood relative

What is known is that “Lee Rockwell” is a recognized propaganda site (https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/lew-rockwell/), meaning, the statistics above are most likely either framed or pure fabrications

And as for your question, it’s easy, too many guns and too easy access to too many guns is the answer. We have more guns in circulation than any other developed nation in the world no matter how you measure it, and coincidentally also the highest number of gun victims of any developed nation in the world, now do you think that perhaps there might just exist a correlation?
 
Who's responsible for gun violence? The person pulling the trigger.

Until those blaming the gun can provide a video where the gun grows arms/legs, walks to where it fire, and pulls its own trigger, it will always be the person pulling the trigger.
 
Who Inflicts the Most Gun Violence in America? The U.S. Government and Its Police Forces

“It is often the case that police shootings, incidents where law enforcement officers pull the trigger on civilians, are left out of the conversation on gun violence. But a police officer shooting a civilian counts as gun violence. Every time an officer uses a gun against an innocent or an unarmed person contributes to the culture of gun violence in this country.”—Journalist Celisa Calacal

Consider that five years after police shot and killed an unarmed 18-year-old man in Ferguson, Missouri, there has been no relief from the government’s gun violence.

Here’s what we’ve learned about the government’s gun violence since Ferguson, according to The Washington Post: If you’re a black American, you’ve got a greater chance of being shot by police. If you’re an unarmed black man, you’re four times more likely to be killed by police than an unarmed white man. Most people killed by police are young men. Since 2015, police have shot and killed an average of 3 people per day. More than 2,500 police departments have shot and killed at least one person since 2015. And while the vast majority of people shot and killed by police are armed, their weapons ranged from guns to knives to toyguns.

Clearly, the U.S. government is not making America any safer.

Indeed, the government’s gun violence—inflicted on unarmed individuals by battlefield-trained SWAT teams, militarized police, and bureaucratic government agents trained to shoot first and ask questions later—poses a greater threat to the safety and security of the nation than any mass shooter.

According to journalist Matt Agorist, “mass shootings … have claimed the lives of 339 people since 2015… [D]uring this same time frame, police in America have claimed the lives of 4,355 citizens.”

That’s 1200% more people killed by police than mass shooters since 2015.

For example, in Texas, a police officer sent to do a welfare check on a 30-year-old woman seen lying on the grass near a shopping center, took aim at the woman’s dog as it ran towards him barking, fired multiple times, and killed the woman instead.

In Chicago, a SWAT team—wearing “army fatigues with black cloth covering their faces and wearing goggles,” armed with automatic rifles, and throwing flash-bang grenades—crashed through the doors of a suburban home and proceeded to storm into bedrooms, holding the children of the household at gunpoint. One child, 13-year-old Amir, was “accidentally” shot in the knee by police while sitting on his bed.

In St. Louis, Missouri, a SWAT team on a mission to deliver an administrative warrant carried out a no-knock raid that ended with police kicking in the homeowner’s front door, and shooting and killing her dog—all over an unpaid gas bill. Taxpayers will have to find $750,000 to settle the lawsuit arising over the cops’ overzealous tactics.

In South Carolina, a 62-year-old homeowner was shot four times through his front door by police who were investigating a medical-assist alarm call that originated from a cell phone inside the home. Dick Tench, believing his house was being broken into, was standing in the foyer of his home armed with a handgun when police, peering through the front door, fired several shots through the door, hitting Tench in the pelvis and the aortic artery. Tench survived, but the bullet lodged in his pelvis will stay there for life.

In Kansas, a SWAT team, attempting to carry out a routine search warrant (the suspect had already been arrested), showed up at a residence around dinnertime, dressed in tactical gear with weapons drawn, and hurled a flash-bang grenade into the house past the 68-year-old woman who was in the process of opening the door to them and in the general direction of a 2-year-old child.

These are just a few recent examples among hundreds this year alone.

Curiously enough, in the midst of the finger-pointing over the latest round of mass shootings, Americans have been so focused on debating who or what is responsible for gun violence—the guns, the gun owners, the Second Amendment, the politicians, or our violent culture—that they have overlooked the fact that the systemic violence being perpetrated by agents of the government has done more collective harm to the American people and their liberties than any single act of terror or mass shooting.

Violence has become our government’s calling card, starting at the top and trickling down, from the more than 80,000 SWAT team raids carried out every year on unsuspecting Americans by heavily armed, black-garbed commandos and the increasingly rapid militarization of local police forces across the country to the drone killings used to target insurgents.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/08...ica-the-u-s-government-and-its-police-forces/

we have the most dangerous society for the police to operate in, due to the NRA paying off the repubs to vote against common sense gun control. The more dangerous it is for cops to pull over people at night, to go to domestic disturbances to break up fights, to be called out to deal with armed intruders, carjackers and criminals in general, the more their lives are at risk due to our society being saturated with guns. Less guns, less deadly interaction. Not just between cops and criminals but between friends when arguing or married couples during arguments.

Very few cops want to shoot people, for any reason other than self preservation, but when so many people they deal with are carrying guns and could shoot them dead in mere seconds, they are a lot more likely to shoot first out of fear and apprehension....

this is how cops react when the populace is not so heavily armed-

M62 shooting: Charts show difference between police ...www.independent.co.uk › UK › Crime
Jan 3, 2017 — According to justice charity Inquest, a total of 23 people have been killed by police in shootings in England and Wales between 2006 and 2016.
 
we have the most dangerous society for the police to operate in, due to the NRA paying off the repubs to vote against common sense gun control. The more dangerous it is for cops to pull over people at night, to go to domestic disturbances to break up fights, to be called out to deal with armed intruders, carjackers and criminals in general, the more their lives are at risk due to our society being saturated with guns. Less guns, less deadly interaction. Not just between cops and criminals but between friends when arguing or married couples during arguments.

Very few cops want to shoot people, for any reason other than self preservation, but when so many people they deal with are carrying guns and could shoot them dead in mere seconds, they are a lot more likely to shoot first out of fear and apprehension....

this is how cops react when the populace is not so heavily armed-

M62 shooting: Charts show difference between police ...www.independent.co.uk › UK › Crime
Jan 3, 2017 — According to justice charity Inquest, a total of 23 people have been killed by police in shootings in England and Wales between 2006 and 2016.

LMFAO you can't be this stupid can you?
 
Blacks make up approx 51% of murders despite being 13% of the population.

and access to guns makes that possible, stupid fuck. also, almost all black people killed are killed by other black people, so ugly ass white goons like you can just try to relax. just like most white people are killed by other white people. the story is about why cops shoot so many, racist commie bitch, but you needed to throw your racist bullshit into the equation.

actually, if you want to sit around and be frightened of someone shooting you, be afraid of the people you know, boy.

observations on stranger homicide - ScienceDirect.comwww.sciencedirect.com › science › article › pii › pdf
other. Stated differently, a relatively small proportion (12 percent) of the homicides in Wolfgang's study involved individuals who were strangers to each other.
 
and access to guns makes that possible, stupid fuck. also, almost all black people killed are killed by other black people, so ugly ass white goons like you can just try to relax. just like most white people are killed by other white people. the story is about why cops shoot so many, racist commie bitch, but you needed to throw your racist bullshit into the equation.

actually, if you want to sit around and be frightened of someone shooting you, be afraid of the people you know, boy.

observations on stranger homicide - ScienceDirect.comwww.sciencedirect.com › science › article › pii › pdf
other. Stated differently, a relatively small proportion (12 percent) of the homicides in Wolfgang's study involved individuals who were strangers to each other.

A.) More Whites have guns than Blacks in the USA.

B.) Jamaica the closest of racial cousins to African Americans has a huge murder rate. Even though Jamaica has gun control. In fact prior to gun control Jamaica had far less murder issues.
 
we have the most dangerous society for the police to operate in, due to the NRA paying off the repubs to vote against common sense gun control. The more dangerous it is for cops to pull over people at night, to go to domestic disturbances to break up fights, to be called out to deal with armed intruders, carjackers and criminals in general, the more their lives are at risk due to our society being saturated with guns. Less guns, less deadly interaction. Not just between cops and criminals but between friends when arguing or married couples during arguments.

Very few cops want to shoot people, for any reason other than self preservation, but when so many people they deal with are carrying guns and could shoot them dead in mere seconds, they are a lot more likely to shoot first out of fear and apprehension....

this is how cops react when the populace is not so heavily armed-

M62 shooting: Charts show difference between police ...www.independent.co.uk › UK › Crime
Jan 3, 2017 — According to justice charity Inquest, a total of 23 people have been killed by police in shootings in England and Wales between 2006 and 2016.

Define common sense gun control.
 
A.) More Whites have guns than Blacks in the USA.

B.) Jamaica the closest of racial cousins to African Americans has a huge murder rate. Even though Jamaica has gun control. In fact prior to gun control Jamaica had far less murder issues.

A) There are 5x as many whites as blacks in the U.S.

B) Looks like they're keeping it in the family.
 
Who's responsible for gun violence? The person pulling the trigger.

the fewer guns in society, or around the house, the less triggers there are to pull, therefore less murders...duh. guns make it too easy. how many wives would kill their husbands if they had to stab them to death up close and personal, or vice versa? how many less depressed kids and teens and adults kill themselves if guns did not make it so easy?

why do some people try to ignore the obvious...look at the murder rates in similar countries that have sensible gun control compared to ours...and you still act like guns are not the biggest factor in those dissimilar rates?
 
the fewer guns in society, or around the house, the less triggers there are to pull, therefore less murders...duh. guns make it too easy. how many wives would kill their husbands if they had to stab them to death up close and personal, or vice versa? how many less depressed kids and teens and adults kill themselves if guns did not make it so easy?

why do some people try to ignore the obvious...look at the murder rates in similar countries that have sensible gun control compared to ours...and you still act like guns are not the biggest factor in those dissimilar rates?

Not once has a gun fired itself. For what you say to be true, that would have to happen.
 
Back
Top