Another Democrat defines this country’s values by disarming the overwhelming majority of law-abiding Americans. Note that scum bags in the U.S. Senate can speak for their voters statewide, while douche bags in the House speak only for the voters in their district:
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Democratic House Caucus Chairman Hakeem Jeffries defended his party’s push for a universal background check bill Wednesday, claiming that any enforcement of the legislation — including federal firearm registration — will be left to the Department of Justice to decide.
Efforts to expand federal firearm background checks to all private sales could eventually lead to federal firearms registration, a potential that worries some Second Amendment advocates and sympathetic Republicans.
“The Department of Justice and the FBI will have primary responsibility for enforcing the requirements that we hope will be enacted into law consistent with the values of the overwhelming majority of the American people,” Jeffries said.
Democrats Express Openness To Federal Gun Registry
Kerry Picket
7:40 PM 02/13/2019
https://dailycaller.com/2019/02/13/dems-open-allow-doj-firearms-registry/
QUESTION: Which group would Jeffries let keep their guns? ANSWER: American-haters of every political persuasion.
Make no mistake about background checks.
BACKGROUND CHECKS IS DOUBLESPEAK FOR REGISTRATION. REGISTRATION IS THE FINAL STEP BEFORE CONFISCATION.
NOTE: Democrat gun-grabbers found a friend in now-Senator Romney:
The government is after those guns they do not know about. Identifying the location of every gun is essential before confiscation begins. The government already knows the names and addresses of a substantial number of law-abiding gun owners; so background checks for ammo is inevitable:
Incidentally, how many movies and TV shows have you seen where a fictional character says his gun is registered, or a cop nails him for having an unregistered gun. The last time I did a background check on the Second Amendment it did not say:
Background checks has always been a backdoor approach to registration; so it comes as no surprise that Democrats want more BCs.
As I said many times, the government fears the location of the guns they do not know about. Confiscating guns is a little difficult when the government does not know where the guns live. In truth, media mouths have just as much to fear from law-abiding unknown gun-owners than does the government. Government stooges in the media must know that if Democrat gun-grabbers bring this country to violent revolution media mouths will be the first ones to get shot.
Never forget that if you own a gun and your name is on a list of any kind the government has that list. As much as I respect the NRA, there is no doubt in my mind the government has the names of everybody on the NRA’s membership roll.
A substantial number of Americans see no harm in background checks or a national registry. The problem is in convincing EVERY private sector American that they will lose a constitutional Right along with gun owners. Bottom line: Americans who are being conned by Democrats are begging to die victims right alongside those gun-owners the federal government will disarm.
The sole purpose of background checks is to set up a data bank so the federal government knows the location of every gun. So how come not one media mouth ever suggested that the government must delete all records of every person after they clear a background check? (I am probably being naive. There is no way in hell the government will delete an essential component of confiscation.)
When you get right down to it, why should Americans believe anything government officials say about background checks when they lie all of the time?
You can believe the one thing government liars say. The police and the military will obey when they are ordered to confiscate all of the guns in the hands of law-abiding Americans?
Finally, federal control of the military, and local law enforcement, combined with confiscating millions of “background check” guns has long been a major objective for Democrats. Every shooting followed by more wall-to-wall media coverage might be enough to give Hakeem Jeffries, Mitt Romney and their kind the groundswell they need to legislate the Second Amendment to death without asking the pubic’s permission to abolish the Second Amendment.
No law is supposed to override the Constitution, yet every one of the more than 40,000 gun control laws on the books supersedes the Second Amendment.
p.s. If you could make one of two organizations disappear forever which one would you choose?
1. National Rifle Association.
2. American Civil Liberties Union.
Before you decide consider which organization is dedicated to the Second Amendment’s priorities. HINT: It ain’t the ACLU.
1. Stand against government tyranny.
2. Self-defense against foreign enemies who come here to kill Americans for political reasons.
3. Self-defense against violent American-born criminals.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Democratic House Caucus Chairman Hakeem Jeffries defended his party’s push for a universal background check bill Wednesday, claiming that any enforcement of the legislation — including federal firearm registration — will be left to the Department of Justice to decide.
Efforts to expand federal firearm background checks to all private sales could eventually lead to federal firearms registration, a potential that worries some Second Amendment advocates and sympathetic Republicans.
“The Department of Justice and the FBI will have primary responsibility for enforcing the requirements that we hope will be enacted into law consistent with the values of the overwhelming majority of the American people,” Jeffries said.
Democrats Express Openness To Federal Gun Registry
Kerry Picket
7:40 PM 02/13/2019
https://dailycaller.com/2019/02/13/dems-open-allow-doj-firearms-registry/
QUESTION: Which group would Jeffries let keep their guns? ANSWER: American-haters of every political persuasion.
Make no mistake about background checks.
BACKGROUND CHECKS IS DOUBLESPEAK FOR REGISTRATION. REGISTRATION IS THE FINAL STEP BEFORE CONFISCATION.
NOTE: Democrat gun-grabbers found a friend in now-Senator Romney:
Provo, Utah (CNN)Mitt Romney said Friday that the nation must act swiftly to address the scourge of gun violence, stating that he was open to tougher measures like "enhanced background checks" if they would help keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill.
Romney open to new gun measures like 'enhanced background checks'
By Maeve Reston, CNN
Updated 11:42 AM ET, Sat February 17, 2018
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/17/politics/romney-gun-measures/index.html
By Maeve Reston, CNN
Updated 11:42 AM ET, Sat February 17, 2018
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/17/politics/romney-gun-measures/index.html
The government is after those guns they do not know about. Identifying the location of every gun is essential before confiscation begins. The government already knows the names and addresses of a substantial number of law-abiding gun owners; so background checks for ammo is inevitable:
CA Lt. Governor Will Introduce Ballot Initiative for Background Checks to Purchase Ammunition
by Liz Sheld
October 15, 2015
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2015/10/1...for-background-checks-to-purchase-ammunition/
by Liz Sheld
October 15, 2015
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2015/10/1...for-background-checks-to-purchase-ammunition/
Incidentally, how many movies and TV shows have you seen where a fictional character says his gun is registered, or a cop nails him for having an unregistered gun. The last time I did a background check on the Second Amendment it did not say:
. . . the right of the people to keep and bear REGISTERED Arms shall not be infringed.
Background checks has always been a backdoor approach to registration; so it comes as no surprise that Democrats want more BCs.
As I said many times, the government fears the location of the guns they do not know about. Confiscating guns is a little difficult when the government does not know where the guns live. In truth, media mouths have just as much to fear from law-abiding unknown gun-owners than does the government. Government stooges in the media must know that if Democrat gun-grabbers bring this country to violent revolution media mouths will be the first ones to get shot.
Never forget that if you own a gun and your name is on a list of any kind the government has that list. As much as I respect the NRA, there is no doubt in my mind the government has the names of everybody on the NRA’s membership roll.
A substantial number of Americans see no harm in background checks or a national registry. The problem is in convincing EVERY private sector American that they will lose a constitutional Right along with gun owners. Bottom line: Americans who are being conned by Democrats are begging to die victims right alongside those gun-owners the federal government will disarm.
The sole purpose of background checks is to set up a data bank so the federal government knows the location of every gun. So how come not one media mouth ever suggested that the government must delete all records of every person after they clear a background check? (I am probably being naive. There is no way in hell the government will delete an essential component of confiscation.)
When you get right down to it, why should Americans believe anything government officials say about background checks when they lie all of the time?
You can believe the one thing government liars say. The police and the military will obey when they are ordered to confiscate all of the guns in the hands of law-abiding Americans?
Finally, federal control of the military, and local law enforcement, combined with confiscating millions of “background check” guns has long been a major objective for Democrats. Every shooting followed by more wall-to-wall media coverage might be enough to give Hakeem Jeffries, Mitt Romney and their kind the groundswell they need to legislate the Second Amendment to death without asking the pubic’s permission to abolish the Second Amendment.
No law is supposed to override the Constitution, yet every one of the more than 40,000 gun control laws on the books supersedes the Second Amendment.
p.s. If you could make one of two organizations disappear forever which one would you choose?
1. National Rifle Association.
2. American Civil Liberties Union.
Before you decide consider which organization is dedicated to the Second Amendment’s priorities. HINT: It ain’t the ACLU.
1. Stand against government tyranny.
2. Self-defense against foreign enemies who come here to kill Americans for political reasons.
3. Self-defense against violent American-born criminals.
