Teflon Don
I'm back baby
If she was so awesome they would be bellying up next to her. Let's see if our marxist JPP friends can respond without "but, but but Trump"
Why are blue state democrats running from harris?
- Thread starter Teflon Don
- Start date
Indeed.
From the link:
"Pennsylvania incumbent Sen. Bob Casey (D) has even embraced Trump’s tariff policies. His campaign launched an ad last week that described him as “independent” and touted how he “bucked” the Biden administration to protect fracking and “sided with Trump to end NAFTA.”
“There’s no party affiliation in Casey ads. I don’t recall seeing any that say ‘Democrat’ or anything like that. He’s running as an incumbent on his own record,” said Berwood Yost, the director of the Center for Public Opinion Research at Franklin & Marshall College.
“He’s trying to distance himself a little bit from an administration that is viewed negatively by the most part. He doesn’t want to be tied to that either through Biden or Harris,” he said.
Yost said Casey has dabbled in some of the populist messaging that is Trump’s forte to drive a wedge between working-class, blue-collar voters and his Republican opponent, David McCormick, the former CEO of Bridgewater, one of the country’s biggest hedge funds..."
From the link:
"Pennsylvania incumbent Sen. Bob Casey (D) has even embraced Trump’s tariff policies. His campaign launched an ad last week that described him as “independent” and touted how he “bucked” the Biden administration to protect fracking and “sided with Trump to end NAFTA.”
“There’s no party affiliation in Casey ads. I don’t recall seeing any that say ‘Democrat’ or anything like that. He’s running as an incumbent on his own record,” said Berwood Yost, the director of the Center for Public Opinion Research at Franklin & Marshall College.
“He’s trying to distance himself a little bit from an administration that is viewed negatively by the most part. He doesn’t want to be tied to that either through Biden or Harris,” he said.
Yost said Casey has dabbled in some of the populist messaging that is Trump’s forte to drive a wedge between working-class, blue-collar voters and his Republican opponent, David McCormick, the former CEO of Bridgewater, one of the country’s biggest hedge funds..."
christiefan915
Catalyst
<yawn> Another misogynist represents. No wonder his wife identifies as a Korean male.
Last edited:
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
It appears that they are:
Newsweek
https://www.newsweek.com › donald-trump-kamala-har...
Trump Winning Every Swing State is Most Likely Scenario—Nate Silver Model
Today at nullToday at null1 hour ago — In this scenario, the vice president would win 232 electoral college votes and Trump would win the presidency. trump. Donald Trump on October 23 ...
Go back to sleep, old man.
Quote
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
Nate also picked Secretary Clinton to win in 2016.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Yep, all the way up to the morning of Election Day.
She said she won.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Is that so?
Nate is now compromised, he’s owned by Peter Thiel.
cawacko
Well-known member
Interesting read on Nate Silver from Vox (a mainstream liberal site). (I couldn't post the entire article so I just gave the link)
Here's a paragraph on the 2016 election (and the complaints that he got it wrong):
"The 2016 general election was a different story. In the now-crowded election forecast space, Silver’s model matched the others by calling Clinton the favorite, but in the final weeks stood out for offering Trump an unusually high chance of winning, unlike other models that said he’d almost certainly lose. He cannot claim to have predicted Trump’s win (the final forecast gave that a 28 percent chance of happening), but his arguments for why the polling in fact pointed to an uncertain race were vindicated."
They address the conspiracy theories that he's owned by Thiel:
Baseless conspiracy theories have been hatched that Silver’s recently announced gig as an adviser to the online prediction market Polymarket is spurring him to do the bidding of right-wing billionaires and skew his analysis against Harris. (Silver has strongly denied those claims. “Peter Thiel isn’t paying me any more than he’s paying someone who works for Facebook or Lyft,” he recently posted on X.)
And he got sh*t for calling out early the issues with Biden's age in which turns out he was correct.
Not trying to throw a stray here but my man archives is fond of saying us on the right only like to listen to confirmation bias. Seems that fits those on the left turning on Silver.
www.vox.com
Here's a paragraph on the 2016 election (and the complaints that he got it wrong):
"The 2016 general election was a different story. In the now-crowded election forecast space, Silver’s model matched the others by calling Clinton the favorite, but in the final weeks stood out for offering Trump an unusually high chance of winning, unlike other models that said he’d almost certainly lose. He cannot claim to have predicted Trump’s win (the final forecast gave that a 28 percent chance of happening), but his arguments for why the polling in fact pointed to an uncertain race were vindicated."
They address the conspiracy theories that he's owned by Thiel:
Baseless conspiracy theories have been hatched that Silver’s recently announced gig as an adviser to the online prediction market Polymarket is spurring him to do the bidding of right-wing billionaires and skew his analysis against Harris. (Silver has strongly denied those claims. “Peter Thiel isn’t paying me any more than he’s paying someone who works for Facebook or Lyft,” he recently posted on X.)
And he got sh*t for calling out early the issues with Biden's age in which turns out he was correct.
Not trying to throw a stray here but my man archives is fond of saying us on the right only like to listen to confirmation bias. Seems that fits those on the left turning on Silver.
What happened to Nate Silver
Once beloved by progressives, Silver now feuds with them regularly. He tells us why.
What happened to Nate Silver
Once beloved by progressives, Silver now feuds with them regularly. He tells us why.
www.vox.com
It's because they understand the filthy whore vote won't put them over the top?
Yakuda
Verified User
I love this simple minded approach to everything you leftist nitwits have. Anyone who cares to question a black person is racist. Questioning a woman is misogynistic. Question a gay or tranny is some other other kind of phobia or ism. You people sound like morons probably because you are morons.
Yakuda
Verified User
Yes. As late as 2020. What the hell is wrong with you people. You STILL can't figure out why people ridicule you can you?
Hillary Clinton Maintains 2016 Election ‘Was Not On the Level’: ‘We Still Don’t Know What Really Happened’
Hillary Clinton is sticking with her conviction that the 2016 presidential election was not conducted legitimately, saying the details surrounding her loss are still unclear."There was a widespread understanding that this election [in 2016] was not on the level," Clinton said during an interview...
If you had read beyond the first sentence you might have learned why though learning seems not be your forte.
They are trying to lure Trump voters; the Democrats they feel they already have.
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
your politicians are
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
so they are lying?
She thinks she did win.
Most of the polls show Trump ahead in the swing states.
Nap time, old man.