Why giving "rights" to women is a mistake

MarcusA

Verified User
A woman's proper place is at the foot of the male; she, of course is his rightful property and conquest as ordained by nature, to provide him with sex and heirs.

Sadly, in our decadent modern society, women are given rights which pervert nature's order and their rightful status as property of the man, for example:

1. As prominent fascist philosophers such as Evola have postulated, rape (in the context of marriage or concubinages) is a man's natural right; not only does it provide women with superior progeny (since virile and dominant men provide better genetics than weakings or defectives do), but a man's sex-drive is sated even more than usual when it is accompanied with violent passion.

Rape, of course, is only "wrong" if it occurs against another man's wife, concubine, or daughters whom he has not legal ownership of, as this is defiling the property of another man.

2. Children conceived through rape are now denied their natural right to live due to abortion; such a thing is quite effeminate and detectible, given that children born from rape are more genetically virile than ones conceived through more "vanilla" forms of sex - a woman is now allowed to abort a baby conceived via rape and subvert her place in nature's hierarchy and legal status as her husband's property - not only is the child now denied a right to live, but the husband is also denied his natural right to rape and plunder his wife or concubine.

If we wish to transform this weak, defective, and decadent society into one which is virle and mighty, worthy of a new world fascist order, we must require women to bear their rapists children, as well as give men legal ownership of women who they decide to marry or take as their concubine (akin to the status which slaves had before we mistakenly decided that the negro deserved the same "rights" as his natural white master does).

So long as he does not cause her any lasting harm and bring shame on her family, he should not have his sex drive natural virility and passions stifled during the act of intercourse, nor should he be shamed into purile acts such as using a condom, or anything which holds his raw, virile passion at bay (much as she should not be denied the possibility and noble sacrifice of dying in the act of giving birth to her lord and master's progeny, and subvert her natural life expectancy.)

For she doted upon their paramours, whose flesh is as the flesh of asses, and whose issue is like the issue of horses. 21Thus thou calledst to remembrance the lewdness of thy youth, in bruising thy teats by the Egyptians for the paps of thy youth.

Ezekiel 23:20
 
A woman's proper place is at the foot of the male; she, of course is his rightful property and conquest as ordained by nature, to provide him with sex and heirs.

Sadly, in our decadent modern society, women are given rights which pervert nature's order and their rightful status as property of the man, for example:

1. As prominent fascist philosophers such as Evola have postulated, rape (in the context of marriage or concubinages) is a man's natural right; not only does it provide women with superior progeny (since virile and dominant men provide better genetics than weakings or defectives do), but a man's sex-drive is sated even more than usual when it is accompanied with violent passion.

Rape, of course, is only "wrong" if it occurs against another man's wife, concubine, or daughters whom he has not legal ownership of, as this is defiling the property of another man.

2. Children conceived through rape are now denied their natural right to live due to abortion; such a thing is quite effeminate and detectible, given that children born from rape are more genetically virile than ones conceived through more "vanilla" forms of sex - a woman is now allowed to abort a baby conceived via rape and subvert her place in nature's hierarchy and legal status as her husband's property - not only is the child now denied a right to live, but the husband is also denied his natural right to rape and plunder his wife or concubine.

If we wish to transform this weak, defective, and decadent society into one which is virle and mighty, worthy of a new world fascist order, we must require women to bear their rapists children, as well as give men legal ownership of women who they decide to marry or take as their concubine (akin to the status which slaves had before we mistakenly decided that the negro deserved the same "rights" as his natural white master does).

So long as he does not cause her any lasting harm and bring shame on her family, he should not have his sex drive natural virility and passions stifled during the act of intercourse, nor should he be shamed into purile acts such as using a condom, or anything which holds his raw, virile passion at bay (much as she should not be denied the possibility and noble sacrifice of dying in the act of giving birth to her lord and master's progeny, and subvert her natural life expectancy.)

For she doted upon their paramours, whose flesh is as the flesh of asses, and whose issue is like the issue of horses. 21Thus thou calledst to remembrance the lewdness of thy youth, in bruising thy teats by the Egyptians for the paps of thy youth.

Ezekiel 23:20

Hasn't your dumb ass figured out that you can't troll?
 
Back
Top