SJJRSJJS
Verified User
There are already too many gun laws(30,000) on the books, and that is why I am against any more for any reason. Its not that each individual law that I'm personally against, it is just the fact that there is a constant chipping away at our right to bear arms with one law after another. I give a great example of this to anyone who wants to debate me on this subject; Give me a good axe, a sharpening stone, a tent, food and water and I will bring down the 30 foot in diameter General Sherman Sequoia tree. I will get up every morning to take a few hacks with my axe, rest a litttle, eat and take a few more hacks. It may take me more than 5 years, I will bring that huge tree down. This is what the antigunners are trying to do, create one law after another until we have no more guns, and by making it so difficult for the gun manufactururs to compete with all the regulations. They would ask US why do we do not need semiautos, when we can target shoot with single shot rifles. They have basically ruined the hunting in Califa, by making it increasingly more difficult to find land to hunt on, because you have to have written permission to hunt on any privately owned land. It used to be that if a field in Mendota or Tranquility near Fresno was not posted, fenced, or newly planted, we could hunt Pheasants on it, but not anymore. Also, the lead shot to steel shot issue has turned once very valuable Greener, Parker and Ithaca double shotguns into fireplace mantle guns. If any antigunner wants to debate me on this issue, bring it on, you all will lose, trust me.