Why won’t the retRumplicans call witnesses?

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
Why are the ReTRumplicans in the Senate trying to get away with not calling the key witnesses to tRumps crimes?

If he was innocent you would think they would call them as an in your face to Democrats!!!!???
 
Why are the ReTRumplicans in the Senate trying to get away with not calling the key witnesses to tRumps crimes?

If he was innocent you would think they would call them as an in your face to Democrats!!!!???

INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.

You would think that a supposed lawyer, even a fake one, would know that.

:facepalm:
 
Why are the ReTRumplicans in the Senate trying to get away with not calling the key witnesses to tRumps crimes?

If he was innocent you would think they would call them as an in your face to Democrats!!!!???

Stick to chasing ambulances, soothsaying is not for you!!
 
Why are the ReTRumplicans in the Senate trying to get away with not calling the key witnesses to tRumps crimes?

If he was innocent you would think they would call them as an in your face to Democrats!!!!???

Why do you care Jarod? Republicans can do what they want

I admit I am torn between wanting McConnell to laugh in Pelosi’s face and dismiss this out of hand or drag this out indefinitely. I can’t decide which would fuck the democrat party harder

I am leaning toward the former as I don’t want the Senate to legitimize anything the House did. They should mock it
 
Why are the ReTRumplicans in the Senate trying to get away with not calling the key witnesses to tRumps crimes?

If he was innocent you would think they would call them as an in your face to Democrats!!!!???

At the very least the Senate should follow the same rules and procedures Shifty followed right? You can’t object to that can you?
 
Why are the ReTRumplicans in the Senate trying to get away with not calling the key witnesses to tRumps crimes?

If he was innocent you would think they would call them as an in your face to Democrats!!!!???

OH...like the STALIN-O-CRATS CALLED THE GOP WITNESSES IN THE POLITBURO?? LIKE THAT??


"HEARSAY" =/= "WITNESSING" ANYTHING.
 
Why are the ReTRumplicans in the Senate trying to get away with not calling the key witnesses to tRumps crimes?

If he was innocent you would think they would call them as an in your face to Democrats!!!!???

i dont see the need. If I was the GOP i would focus 100% on the fisa abuses and let that taint everything else. Its frankly indefensible for the democrats.
 
Isn’t it great how Jarod talks like Stalin?

“If you are innocent you have nothing to hide”

The left is turning hundreds of years of jurisprudence on its head all because of their abject hatred of Trump and his supporters
 
Why are the ReTRumplicans in the Senate trying to get away with not calling the key witnesses to tRumps crimes?

If he was innocent you would think they would call them as an in your face to Democrats!!!!???

Witnesses have to have witnessed something, eh? About the best they could do at this point is try to find someone who can swear under oath that Vindman was not listening in on the phone call with Zelenskyy.
 
Why do you care Jarod? Republicans can do what they want

I admit I am torn between wanting McConnell to laugh in Pelosi’s face and dismiss this out of hand or drag this out indefinitely. I can’t decide which would fuck the democrat party harder

I am leaning toward the former as I don’t want the Senate to legitimize anything the House did. They should mock it

I care because I care about justice, the truth should come out. The more Americans know the more just the result will be. I believe in the facts being exposed not hidden. IF the facts are exposed, justice will be done. If the facts are hidden criminals will often get away with is.
 
At the very least the Senate should follow the same rules and procedures Shifty followed right? You can’t object to that can you?

One is a trial, the other is an indictment, so rules should be different. I think all facts relevant to Trumps activities should be public.
 
OH...like the STALIN-O-CRATS CALLED THE GOP WITNESSES IN THE POLITBURO?? LIKE THAT??


"HEARSAY" =/= "WITNESSING" ANYTHING.

Much of the House testimony was not hearsay, most of the hearsay was admissible hearsay. You are using a tired argument.

You want the facts hidden?
 
The facts were not exposed in the House hearings.

No crimes were committed and the president will be exonerated in the Senate and the far left loons in the House will have failed, once again, to remove the sitting president, that the American people elected, from office.

The American voters elect our presidents, not the fanatics in the House.
 
Witnesses have to have witnessed something, eh? About the best they could do at this point is try to find someone who can swear under oath that Vindman was not listening in on the phone call with Zelenskyy.

You could have Muleney and Bolton testify to what they know. Rudy seems like he wants to tell what he knows.
 
The Senate Republicans will control this circus started by the fanatics in the House.

No crimes were committed and the president will be exonerated in the Senate and the far left loons in the House will have failed, once again, to remove the sitting president, that the American people elected, from office.

The American voters elect our presidents, not the fanatics in the House.
 
You could have Muleney and Bolton testify to what they know. Rudy seems like he wants to tell what he knows.

They'll fight testimony from those guys tooth and nail; they would be the last torpedo to send the sinking SS Trumptanic to Davy Jones' locker. Mitch is really going to have to walk a tightrope here. Most of the (D)s' witnesses are credible. The Reichwing Noise Machine has spent weeks now trying to impugn them anyways, and screeching (falsely) that poor POTUS's defenders weren't allowed to question them. Having them front and center in the Senate, for both sides to query, would destroy both of those "defenses."
 
Back
Top