APP - will the irs rein in the 501(c) entities?

Don Quixote

cancer survivor
Contributor
i hope so. maybe it will stop the anonymous cash flowing into last minute attack adds.

in any case, if they are being misused, the deserve to be dissolved or required to adhere to the regulations governing them, regardless of what party they support.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration is trying to rein in the use of tax-exempt groups for political campaigning.
[h=2]Related Stories[/h]





The effort launched Tuesday is an attempt to reduce the role of loosely regulated big-money political outfits like GOP political guru Karl Rove's Crossroads GPS and the pro-Obama Priorities USA.
The Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department said they want to prohibit such groups from using "candidate-related political activity" like running ads, registering voters or distributing campaign literature as activities that qualify them to be tax-exempt "social welfare" organizations.
The agencies say there will be a lengthy comment period before any regulations will be finalized. That means groups like Crossroads and Priorities USA will be able to collect millions of dollars from anonymous donors ahead of next year's campaign.
"This proposed guidance is a first critical step toward creating clear-cut definitions of political activity by tax-exempt social welfare organizations," said Mark Mazur, treasury assistant secretary for tax policy. "We are committed to getting this right before issuing final guidance that may affect a broad group of organizations. It will take time to work through the regulatory process and carefully consider all public feedback as we strive to ensure that the standards for tax-exemption are clear and can be applied consistently."
Organized under section 501(c)(4) of the tax code, such groups are able to raise millions of dollars to influence elections. But they can also be small-scale tea party groups, many of which say they were harassed by the IRS after seeking tax exempt status.
View gallery."






FILE - In this Tuesday, June 4, 2013, file photo, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman, Rep. Dave …

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp, R-Mich., was skeptical of the administration's move.
"There continues to be an ongoing investigation, with many documents yet to be uncovered, into how the IRS systematically targeted and abused conservative-leaning groups," he said. "This smacks of the administration trying to shut down potential critics."
The 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court decision lifted the limits on donations by labor unions and companies to 501(c)(4) groups, allowing Crossroads, the largest of them, to raise large sums outside the limits that apply to candidates' campaigns and traditional party committees.
"Enormous abuses have taken place under the current rules, which have allowed groups largely devoted to campaign activities to operate as nonprofit groups in order to keep secret the donors funding their campaign activities," said Fred Wertheimer, president of Democracy 21, which advocates limits on money in politics.
Under current rules, social welfare organizations may conduct some political work as long as it's not their main activity. The proposed new rules would block such things as running ads that "expressly advocate for a clearly identified political candidate or candidates of a political party" as fulfilling their tax-exempt mission. And ads that simply mention a politician to, for instance, urge him or her to vote a certain way couldn't be run 60 days before a general election of 30 days before a primary.
View gallery."






FILE - In this Wednesday, Oct. 16, 2013, file photo, the U.S Treasury Building stands in Washington. …

The rules also would limit voter drives and voter registration efforts and distribution of literature.
The idea behind the new regulations is to simplify the rules of the road going forward, proponents say. The current rules are confusing and prone to abuse, critics say.
Treasury and the IRS don't have a proposal yet about what proportion of a 501(c)(4) group's activities must promote social welfare and are soliciting input. In other words, they don't have a recommendation as to what percentage of a group's time and money can be spent on politics.
Some of the outside groups that could be affected by the proposal, including Crossroads GPS and Priorities USA, did not have any initial reaction to the announcement. The groups are expected to weigh in on the rulemaking as it proceeds.
Any changes to the regulations likely would not affect the 2014 elections because of legal challenges but the rule changes could shape the next presidential election, said Kenneth Gross, a campaign finance attorney and former head of enforcement for the Federal Election Commission.
"Brightening what are now blurred lines — what is political activity — is not only useful but necessary to have some kind of clarity to a vehicle that has been used to the tune of millions and millions of dollars," he said.
But Gross cautioned that "this is a long and winding road before anything is in ink."
___
Associated Press writer Ken Thomas contributed to this report.

http://news.yahoo.com/irs-pushes-rein-tax-exempt-political-groups-203634659--election.html
 
Now that he is done using them? Lefties do that. The rape a rule the claim "we need to change the rules" just like they did with filibustering judges
 
The Obama Administration or the IRS cannot re-write legislation. That can only be done by Congress.

While that is true, there is a dirty little secret in Washington DC that both parties are guilty of. They purposefully write laws in a vague nature leaving it up to regulatory bodies to "fill in the blanks". If you look at Obamadontcare, it specifically gives power to HHS secretary to determine regs. That makes Kathleen Stupidelius one of the most powerful dumbasses in the country right now.
 
While that is true, there is a dirty little secret in Washington DC that both parties are guilty of. They purposefully write laws in a vague nature leaving it up to regulatory bodies to "fill in the blanks". If you look at Obamadontcare, it specifically gives power to HHS secretary to determine regs. That makes Kathleen Stupidelius one of the most powerful dumbasses in the country right now.

Very few laws are written as vague as Obamacare was; thus the claim by the brain dead partisan hack Pelosi that they would know what was IN the law AFTER it was passed.

Just another reason the Scotus should have deemed the legislation unconstitutional.
 
I don't know; you're the one claiming that the IRS and Obama Administration are going to re-write the "rules".

they are not rewriting anything, they are changing the enforcement/investigation of existing rules to determine if various organizations that are claiming to be 'not for profit' when in fact their principal function is political.

i find your logo amusing when you spout large amounts of bs
 
they are not rewriting anything, they are changing the enforcement/investigation of existing rules to determine if various organizations that are claiming to be 'not for profit' when in fact their principal function is political.

i find your logo amusing when you spout large amounts of bs

I find it amusing that you think I spout a large amount if BS. As a Liberal, BS seems to be your forte'.

So based on your own BS, the Obama Administration isn't going to propose changes but rather enforce the rules...but only if these organizations are not in support of Democrats. Got it. ::wink wink::
 
I find it amusing that you think I spout a large amount if BS. As a Liberal, BS seems to be your forte'.

So based on your own BS, the Obama Administration isn't going to propose changes but rather enforce the rules...but only if these organizations are not in support of Democrats. Got it. ::wink wink::

your bs was debunked when it was discovered that the irs was also going after democratic not for profit organizations

imo 501(c)s should all be closed
 
your bs was debunked when it was discovered that the irs was also going after democratic not for profit organizations

It was?

imo 501(c)s should all be closed

Why should they all be closed? What is it about the Constitution you Liberals find so repugnant?

In my opinion, we should have term limits on Congress, a Fair Tax, eliminate the Departments of Agriculture, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development, and eliminate ALL subsidies.
 
Back
Top