Wisconsin Women suckerpunched

Rune

Mjölner
Way back in February, the Wisconsin state Assembly followed the state Senate in voting to repeal the enforcement part of the state’s equal pay law. The legislature then waited more than a month to send the bill to Gov. Scott Walker for his signature.
He had, according to the state constitution, six days to act on the bill. The deadline was 5:00 p.m. on Thursday. The governor quietly signed the bill into law on Thursday, according to the Legislative Reference Bureau, and it is now called Act 219.
Walker’s office did not return repeated requests for comment.
Gee, do you think they’re hoping this won’t draw much attention?
Republicans, including Mitt Romney, have been lining up to say they think the Augusta National Golf Club should admit women. Just days ago, in the run-up to the Wisconsin presidential primary, Scott Walker was pretty much Romney’s hero. Has the Etch-A-Sketch already shaken and wiped that one clean, or would the dividing line between discrimination against women that Romney supports and discrimination against women that he doesn’t support fall somewhere between membership rules in Augusta and paychecks in Kenosha? Walker didn’t make discrimination against women legal, after all. He just took away the legal recourse women who have been discriminated against previously had.

A spokesman for Barrett’s campaign said that Walker’s “ideological civil war includes a war on women, and repeal today of this protection against pay discrimination is a major step backwards for Wisconsin values and basic fairness.”
Scott Walker wants his rollback of women’s rights in Wisconsin to go unnoticed. But, especially with the recall election coming up, people need to know this. Make sure the word gets out by sharing this story over Facebook and Twitter or with your friends and family in Wisconsin. And make a $5 donation to the Democratic Party of Wisconsin to take the bill-signing pen out of his hand.

http://www.thedailycall.org/?p=17576
 
How about you link us up to the actual text of what was signed, rather than a dailykos filtered version of what occurred?

How about you do it? I posted two seperate links on this, and that in itself was quite difficult, since I have Comcast.
 
How about you do it? I posted two seperate links on this, and that in itself was quite difficult, since I have Comcast.

links to far left wing sites. If you want people to discuss an issue, it is up to you to actually provide a link to the actual text of what you want to discuss. Linking to left wing sites that simply state partisan rhetoric isn't sufficient... unless of course they actually link to the legislation, which conveniently they do not.
 
Only trolls create two threads about something they consider extremely noteworthy? I don't think you need me to thread through the records and find all the duplicate threads you have made...since that would indicate you are a troll, supposedly.
 
lol....dune proves he is a troll...he only responds to attack, he always runs away from actual debate.

i don't have dupe threads on the very same subject. that is a flat out lie. two threads, on the same subject on the same morning. wtf? desperate for attention?

now, stop trolling and go answer my post on the subject in the other thread. or are you uncomfortable actually discussing issues with me?
 
So you saw this two weeks ago and didn't feel like it mattered?
I posted a new thread about it. Where were you? ;)

Essentially what this law does is pull the teeth of the law. You can sue for damages, if one can prove there were damages but with out punitive measures to discourage this bad behavior the intent of the law is pretty much gutted.
 
I posted a new thread about it. Where were you? ;)

Essentially what this law does is pull the teeth of the law. You can sue for damages, if one can prove there were damages but with out punitive measures to discourage this bad behavior the intent of the law is pretty much gutted.

so in other words, they are hurting the pocket books of the Dems trial lawyer faithful. poor lawyers.
 
Hilarious when you feign ignorance of your own obsessions, yuck. Idiot.

do explain...why do you support starting two threads on the very same subject on the very same morning. it makes it hard to keep all the posts together.

i predict no explanation and more flailing from the psycho.
 
do explain...why do you support starting two threads on the very same subject on the very same morning. it makes it hard to keep all the posts together.

i predict no explanation and more flailing from the psycho.

You bitching about anyone starting multiple threads on the same topic or hijacking threads to reflect the identical topics is genuinely hilarious.
 
Back
Top